16.11.2012 Views

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

208 Khaldoun Al Agha <strong>and</strong> Steven Martin<br />

<strong>Network</strong>) has enabled radio multi-hop communications on an extensive geographic<br />

area. In Figure 9.4, the PRs represent nodes which are connected by radio links. All<br />

PRs can communicate directly by radio (left side of the figure) or by using intermediate<br />

PRs (right side). The later is called multi-hop communications. If, for example,<br />

a communication must pass by three radio links, one speaks of three hops. The PR-<br />

Net is the basis of ad hoc networks. The reader will find a complete description of<br />

packet radio networks in [11].<br />

PR<br />

PR<br />

PR<br />

PR<br />

Radio Link<br />

Fig. 9.4 Examples of PR-network<br />

PR PR<br />

PR<br />

MANET was created in 1995 in order to provide RFC to propose routing protocols<br />

for ad hoc networks. At that time, only Hiperlan1 could provide information<br />

forwarding in an ad hoc environment. However, Hiperlan1 was creating a layer 2<br />

routing which was not compliant with other st<strong>and</strong>ards. The objective of MANET is<br />

to adapt IP routing to work in ad hoc networks. We summarize four protocols which<br />

belong to two different concepts: reactive <strong>and</strong> proactive.<br />

9.4.2 Reactive Protocols<br />

Reactive protocols offer routes for information flows only on dem<strong>and</strong>. It means that<br />

the protocol will react to find a route when a source node needs to send information<br />

to a destination node. During the remaining time, the node is idle or active to participate<br />

in the forwarding process to serve other source nodes. The reactive protocols<br />

do not consume many resources when idle, however to discover a route (since they<br />

don’t have any topology information), they flood requests among the network <strong>and</strong><br />

in this case consume a huge amount of the network resources. Examples of reactive<br />

protocols are AODV [16] <strong>and</strong> DSR [10].<br />

9.4.2.1 AODV (Ad hoc On Dem<strong>and</strong> Distance Vector)<br />

AODV today has many successes <strong>and</strong> is used in many systems. The Zigbee <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Wi-Fi mesh networks use an adapted version of AODV. AODV belongs to the class<br />

of distance vector routing protocols. In these protocols, to reach a destination, the<br />

mobile node uses the next hop allowing the smallest distance in number of hops<br />

between it <strong>and</strong> the destination. AODV is a reactive protocol; hence mobile nodes do<br />

not retain any information for nodes not concerned by the active traffic information<br />

PR<br />

PR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!