o_19ko2dt161ng2j4e1tgnoqv1s45a.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
L.G. SAW & R.C.K. CHUNG (2007)<br />
and Sarawak. In working towards the flora of Malaysia, we have continued to separate the<br />
two regions for the purpose of further analysis, simply out of convenience from the historical<br />
perspective and also a general tendency in many revisions to maintain the two regions as<br />
separate. We have compiled a review of recently published revisions against these families<br />
that included the floras of Peninsular Malaysia (Malaya) and of Sabah and Sarawak (Borneo).<br />
The recent revisions include publications from the Flora Malesiana series, Tree Flora of Malaya,<br />
the revised Flora of Malaya, Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak, and other journal articles or<br />
series covering revisions of the whole family in the list. In the analysis, out of the 250 families<br />
occurring in Peninsular Malaysia, 207 families (83%) have recent revisions. This is a very<br />
good coverage. For Sabah and Sarawak or Borneo, the coverage is much lower, 164 families<br />
out of 253 occurring there or about 64%. In recent years, world checklists are being generated<br />
and these are being made available in the internet, for example, the checklists available from<br />
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (www.kew.org/wcb/), where the monocots are now available<br />
for downloading. Such checklists can certainly provide an initial update especially for Borneo<br />
where existing list by Masamune (1942, 1945) has long become obsolete.<br />
TOWARDS A FLORA OF MALAYSIA<br />
In the last decade and half, Malaysia has been very fortunate in terms of the resources available<br />
to document its floristic diversity. The Tree Flora of Malaya published its final volume in<br />
1989 (Ng 1989). In 1990, it became apparent that the botanical work of documenting the flora<br />
of Malaysia should continue and it was an obvious decision to continue the well tested formula<br />
of the Tree Flora of Malaya to be extended to Sabah and Sarawak. The first author was then<br />
delegated to prepare proposals for funding towards a Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak project.<br />
The project was launched in 1991 for first five years with funding from the Malaysian<br />
Government, the Overseas Development Administration (ODA) of the United Kingdom and<br />
the International Tropical Timber Organisation (ITTO). It was originally estimated that the<br />
project will run for ten years to cover about 3,000 species (Soepadmo 1995) in eight volumes.<br />
Having completed five volumes of the tree flora, with the current estimate of about 4,000<br />
species of trees, we envisage that the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak will need at least<br />
another ten years to complete the remaining estimated 2,500 species at a revision rate of about<br />
250 species per year using present resources.<br />
In realising the Flora of Malaysia, a pragmatic approach is to review our existing commitment<br />
towards the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak project and how else can we extend into a full<br />
national flora project. The institutions currently engaged in the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak,<br />
i.e. the Forest Research Institute Malaysia, and the Forest Departments of Sabah and Sarawak<br />
would want to complete the Tree Flora project. The review of species distribution and literature<br />
provided above also provide an indication that the Flora of Malaysia can be completed in a<br />
phase approach. In this pragmatic approach, the Flora of Malaysia can be tackled as two<br />
regional projects, revisions for Peninsular Malaysia and for Sabah and Sarawak. And it is this<br />
approach that we have taken towards plans to realise the Flora of Malaysia. In April 2004, the<br />
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment was formed. With the creation of the ministry,<br />
it became of national priority that the government was committed to document the biodiversity<br />
of the country. The work of documenting the flora of Malaysia became very quickly a national<br />
need and no more an academic wish-list for botanists in Malaysia. For the immediate use, the<br />
country requires a checklist of its flora, as Peninsular Malaysia has already a checklist; the<br />
219