J. GREGSON, R. DE KOK, J. MOAT & S. BACHMAN (2007) subsequently (from 250 metres to 30 metres) obtained, using Landsat ETM (enhanced thematic mapper) on board Landsat 7. CONCLUSION Recent advances in information technology have led to the development of computer based methods in conservation biology, and GIS is a particularly useful tool for plant conservation. Target 2 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation aims for “a preliminary assessment of the conservation status of all known plant species, at national, regional and international levels” (Anon. 2002) but at current rates, this target will take a long time to reach. GIS can speed up this process by providing a means to automate the preliminary assessment of the conservation status of a particular species based upon specimen information present within existing major collections. The application of these methods is limited by the availability of data and the uncertainties in the available data. These GIS techniques require large amounts of georeferenced specimen data, and such databases are often the product of taxonomic work. However, new technologies facilitating data transfer and electronic publication now make it possible for data held within institutions to be shared and analysed collaboratively. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the following members of staff at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew for their contributions to this paper: Sharon Balding, Stuart Cable, Colin Clubbe, Robyn Cowan, Matthew Daws, Michael Fay, Roger Joiner, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Simon Owens, Hugh Pritchard, Margaret Ramsay, Moctar Sacandé, Vincent Sarasan, Paul Smith, Roger Smith, Nigel Taylor, Clare Tenner and Christopher Wood. REFERENCES ANDREWS, S. 2002. Aquifoliaceae. Pp. 1–28 in Soepadmo, E., Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K. (eds) Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 4. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. ANON., 2002. Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Quebec. ANON., 2005. CEPF Madagascar Vegetation Mapping Project. Availabe at http:// www.vegmad.org/ ASHTON, P.S. 2004. Dipterocarpaceae. Pp. 63–388 in Soepadmo, E., Saw, L.G. & Chung, R.C.K. (eds) Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 5. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. BAENA, S. 2005. Monitoring vegetation cover changes in Mount Oku and the Ijim Ridge (Cameroon) using satellite and aerial sensor detection. Available at http://www.kew.org/ gis/projects/oku_cameroon/index.html BEAMAN, J.H. 1992–2004. The Plants of Mount Kinabalu. 5 volumes. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 255
APPLICATION OF GIS TO CONSERVATION ASSESSMENTS AT THE ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW BURGMAN, M. & FOX, C. 2003. Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Animal Conservation 6: 19–28. CHEEK, M. & JEBB, M. 2001. Nepenthaceae. Flora Malesiana 15, Ser. I: Vol. 15. Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden. 164 pp. COODE, M., DRANSFIELD, J., FORMAN, L., KIRKUP, L. & SAID, I. (eds.) 1996. A checklist of the flowering plants and gymnosperms of Brunei Darussalam. Ministry of Industry and Primary Resources, Brunei Darussalam. 494 pp. DU PUY, D.J. & MOAT, J.F. 1996. A refined classification of the primary vegetation of Madagascar based on the underlying geology: using GIS to map its distribution and to assess its conservation status. Pp. 205–218 in Lourenço W.R. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Biogeography of Madagascar. Editions de l’ORSTROM, Paris. DU PUY, D.J. & MOAT, J.F. 1998. Vegetation mapping and classification in Madagascar (using GIS): implications and recommendations for the conservation of biodiversity. Pp. 97–117 in Huxley, C.R., Lock, J.M. & Cutler, D.F. (eds.) Chorology, taxonomy and ecology of the Floras of African and Madagascar. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. DU PUY, D.J., BOSSER, J., RABEVOHITRA, R., VILLIERS, J., LABAT, J. & MOAT, J.F. 2001. The Leguminosae of Madagascar. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 720 pp. FARAMALALA, M.H. 1988. Etude de la Végétation de Madagascar à l’aide des Données spatiales. Doctoral Thesis, Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse. 167 pp. IUCN 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Swizerland and Cambridge, UK. IUCN 2005. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Swizerland and Cambridge, UK. PRANCE, G.T. 1989. Chrysobalanaceae. Flora Malesiana 10, Ser. I: 635–678. PRANCE, G.T. 1995. Chrysobalanaceae. Pp. 155–180 in Soepadmo, E. & Wong, K.M. (eds.) Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak, Vol. 1. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. SCHATZ, G. 2002. Taxonomy and Herbaria in Service of Plant Conservation: Lessons from Madagascar’s Endemic Families. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Gardens 89(2): 145–152. SCOTT, J.M., DAVIS, F., CSUTI, B., NOSS, K., BUTTERFIELD, B., GROVES, C., ANDERSON, H., CAICCO, S., D’ERCHIA, F., EDWARDS, T.C. Jr, ULLIMAN, J. & WRIGHT, R. 1993. Gap Analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monograph 123. 41 pp. The Malesian Key Group 2004. An Interactive Key to Malesian Seed Plants Version 1.0. The Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden & The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available at http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/herbarium/keys/fm/ WHITE, J. 2004. Range size, error rates and the geometry of rare species distributions. In Brooks, M., Carothers, S. & La Banca, T. (eds.) The Ecology and Management of Rare Plants of Northwestern California: Proceedings from a 2002 Symposium of the North Coast Chapter of the California Native Plant Society. CNPS Press, Sacramento, CA. 226 pp. WILLIS, F., MOAT, J. & PATON, A. 2003. Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 1537–1552. 256
- Page 1:
Status of Biological Diversity in M
- Page 10 and 11:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 12 and 13:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 14 and 15:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 16 and 17:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 18 and 19:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 20 and 21:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 22 and 23:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 24 and 25:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 26 and 27:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 28 and 29:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 30 and 31:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 32 and 33:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 34:
G.W.H. DAVISON & ZUBAID AKBAR (2007
- Page 38 and 39:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 40 and 41:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 42 and 43:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 44 and 45:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 46 and 47:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 48 and 49:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 50 and 51:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 52 and 53:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 54 and 55:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 56 and 57:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 58 and 59:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 60 and 61:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 62 and 63:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 64 and 65:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 66 and 67:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 68 and 69:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 70 and 71:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 72 and 73:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 74 and 75:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 76 and 77:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 78 and 79:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 80 and 81:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 82 and 83:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 84 and 85:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 86 and 87:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 88:
INDRANEIL DAS & NORSHAM YAAKOB (200
- Page 91 and 92:
STATE OF KNOWLEDGE ON FRESHWATER FI
- Page 93 and 94:
STATE OF KNOWLEDGE ON FRESHWATER FI
- Page 95 and 96:
STATE OF KNOWLEDGE ON FRESHWATER FI
- Page 97 and 98:
STATE OF KNOWLEDGE ON FRESHWATER FI
- Page 101 and 102:
1. Cucurlionidae. Photo courtesy Sh
- Page 103 and 104:
MALAYSIAN FRESHWATER CRABS: CONSERV
- Page 105 and 106:
MALAYSIAN FRESHWATER CRABS: CONSERV
- Page 107 and 108:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 109 and 110:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 111 and 112:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 113 and 114:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 115 and 116:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 117 and 118:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 119 and 120:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 121 and 122:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 123 and 124:
Species Status No. of Extent of Ran
- Page 125 and 126:
MALAYSIAN FRESHWATER CRABS: CONSERV
- Page 127 and 128:
MALAYSIAN FRESHWATER CRABS: CONSERV
- Page 129 and 130:
OVERVIEW OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY RES
- Page 131 and 132:
OVERVIEW OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY RES
- Page 133 and 134:
OVERVIEW OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY RES
- Page 135 and 136:
OVERVIEW OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY RES
- Page 137 and 138:
RESEARCH ON THE DIVERSITY OF MOTHS
- Page 139 and 140:
RESEARCH ON THE DIVERSITY OF MOTHS
- Page 141 and 142:
RESEARCH ON THE DIVERSITY OF MOTHS
- Page 143 and 144:
RESEARCH ON THE DIVERSITY OF MOTHS
- Page 145 and 146:
AN OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON BEETLE D
- Page 147 and 148:
AN OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON BEETLE D
- Page 149 and 150:
AN OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON BEETLE D
- Page 151 and 152:
AN OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON BEETLE D
- Page 153 and 154:
AN OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON BEETLE D
- Page 155 and 156:
AN OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON BEETLE D
- Page 157 and 158:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 159 and 160:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 161 and 162:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 163 and 164:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 165 and 166:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 167 and 168:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 169 and 170:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 171 and 172:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 173:
THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON HYMENOPTE
- Page 176 and 177:
LEE SU SEE & ROY WATLING (2007) STA
- Page 178 and 179:
LEE SU SEE & ROY WATLING (2007) wor
- Page 180 and 181:
LEE SU SEE & ROY WATLING (2007) Som
- Page 182 and 183:
LEE SU SEE & ROY WATLING (2007) mac
- Page 184 and 185:
LEE SU SEE & ROY WATLING (2007) HAW
- Page 186:
LEE SU SEE & ROY WATLING (2007) WAT
- Page 191 and 192:
SEAWEED DIVERSITY IN MALAYSIA 1. Ha
- Page 193 and 194:
SEAWEED DIVERSITY IN MALAYSIA seawe
- Page 195 and 196:
Table 1. Checklist of Malaysian Mar
- Page 197 and 198:
Family Siphonocladaceae Boergesenia
- Page 199 and 200:
Caulerpa peltata Lamouroux [Syn: Ca
- Page 201 and 202:
Family Liagoraceae Liagora ceranoid
- Page 203 and 204:
Order Hildenbrandiales Family Hilde
- Page 205 and 206:
Family Lomentariaceae Lomentaria gr
- Page 207 and 208:
Laurencia caduciramulosa Masuda et
- Page 209 and 210:
Dictyota hauckiana Nizamuddin [Syn:
- Page 211 and 212: Sargassum swartzii C. Agardh W C Sa
- Page 213 and 214: SEAWEED DIVERSITY IN MALAYSIA can b
- Page 215 and 216: SEAWEED DIVERSITY IN MALAYSIA assis
- Page 217 and 218: SEAWEED DIVERSITY IN MALAYSIA RAMAC
- Page 219 and 220: TOWARDS THE FLORA OF MALAYSIA the t
- Page 221 and 222: TOWARDS THE FLORA OF MALAYSIA part
- Page 223 and 224: TOWARDS THE FLORA OF MALAYSIA Penin
- Page 225 and 226: TOWARDS THE FLORA OF MALAYSIA On th
- Page 227 and 228: TOWARDS THE FLORA OF MALAYSIA immed
- Page 229 and 230: TOWARDS THE FLORA OF MALAYSIA For t
- Page 231 and 232: TOWARDS THE FLORA OF MALAYSIA BURGE
- Page 233 and 234: TOWARDS THE FLORA OF MALAYSIA NG, F
- Page 236 and 237: NAZIR KHAN NIZAM KHAN & MOHD YUNUS
- Page 238 and 239: NAZIR KHAN NIZAM KHAN & MOHD YUNUS
- Page 240 and 241: NAZIR KHAN NIZAM KHAN & MOHD YUNUS
- Page 242 and 243: NAZIR KHAN NIZAM KHAN & MOHD YUNUS
- Page 244 and 245: NAZIR KHAN NIZAM KHAN & MOHD YUNUS
- Page 246 and 247: NAZIR KHAN NIZAM KHAN & MOHD YUNUS
- Page 248: NAZIR KHAN NIZAM KHAN & MOHD YUNUS
- Page 252 and 253: J. GREGSON, R. DE KOK, J. MOAT & S.
- Page 254 and 255: J. GREGSON, R. DE KOK, J. MOAT & S.
- Page 256 and 257: J. GREGSON, R. DE KOK, J. MOAT & S.
- Page 258 and 259: J. GREGSON, R. DE KOK, J. MOAT & S.
- Page 260 and 261: J. GREGSON, R. DE KOK, J. MOAT & S.
- Page 264 and 265: C. LUSTY, W.A.N.AMARAL, W. D.HAWTHO
- Page 266 and 267: C. LUSTY, W.A.N.AMARAL, W. D.HAWTHO
- Page 268 and 269: C. LUSTY, W.A.N.AMARAL, W. D.HAWTHO
- Page 270 and 271: C. LUSTY, W.A.N.AMARAL, W. D.HAWTHO
- Page 272 and 273: C. LUSTY, W.A.N.AMARAL, W. D.HAWTHO
- Page 274 and 275: C. LUSTY, W.A.N.AMARAL, W. D.HAWTHO
- Page 276: C. LUSTY, W.A.N.AMARAL, W. D.HAWTHO
- Page 279 and 280: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 281 and 282: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 283 and 284: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 285 and 286: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 287 and 288: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 289 and 290: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 291 and 292: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 293 and 294: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 295 and 296: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L
- Page 297: CONSERVATION STRATEGIES OF SHOREA L