08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

#P205 POSTER SESSION IV:<br />

CHEMICAL SIGNALING AND BEHAVIOR;<br />

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR/PSYCHOPHYSICS;<br />

CHEMOSENSATION AND METABOLISM;<br />

VOMERONSASAL AND CHEMICAL<br />

COMMUNICATION<br />

#P206 POSTER SESSION IV:<br />

CHEMICAL SIGNALING AND BEHAVIOR;<br />

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR/PSYCHOPHYSICS;<br />

CHEMOSENSATION AND METABOLISM;<br />

VOMERONSASAL AND CHEMICAL<br />

COMMUNICATION<br />

How do rabbit newborns and human adults perceive the<br />

configuration in a 6-component blending odor mixture?<br />

Sébastien Romagny, Thierry Thomas-Danguin, Gérard Coureaud<br />

Centre des <strong>Sciences</strong> du Goût et de l’Alimentation (CSGA), UMR 6265<br />

CNRS, UMR 1324 INRA, Université de Bourgogne, Flavour Perception<br />

Team and Developmental Ethology and Cognitive Psychology Team<br />

Dijon, France<br />

Comparative studies give the opportunity to better understand<br />

common and dissimilar processes in terms of perception,<br />

cognition and behavior between organisms. Regarding the<br />

elemental and configural perception of odor mixtures, newborn<br />

rabbits and human adults present some similarities. In particular,<br />

they both process a 6-component mixture (RC) in a weak<br />

configural way, leading to the perception of a novel odor (e.g.,<br />

red cordial in humans) in the mixture: in rabbits, neonates do<br />

not respond to RC after learning of one component, while they<br />

generalize <strong>for</strong> another mixture of same complexity; in humans,<br />

the quality of the single odorants is judged as significantly<br />

different to the mixture. Here, we set out to examine whether<br />

the perception of the RC configuration strictly depends on the<br />

quantity and/or the quality of the components. To that goal,<br />

we carried out a generalization experiment in rabbit pups and<br />

a similarity rating task in human adults, using several submixtures<br />

of increasing complexity (i.e., 2, 3, 4 or 5 odorants). We<br />

conditioned the pups to sub-mixtures and tested their behavioral<br />

responsiveness to these stimuli compared to the full mixture<br />

(RC). In humans, participants rated the similarity between<br />

the sub-mixtures and RC. The results indicated that newborn<br />

rabbits became able to respond to the RC mixture when they had<br />

previously acquired at least 4 of its components, whatever their<br />

odor quality. In human adults, similarity between sub-mixtures<br />

and the RC mixture depended more on the odor quality of the<br />

odorants included in sub-mixtures rather than on the number of<br />

mixed odorants. There<strong>for</strong>e, even if these two models shared a<br />

configural perception of the same RC odor mixture, the factors<br />

underpinning its perception seem to be different, at least in part.<br />

The Contribution of the T1R1 Subunit to Taste Detection of<br />

Glutamate as Behaviorally Assessed in a Murine Model.<br />

Kimberly R Smith, Alan C Spector<br />

Florida State University Tallahassee, FL, USA<br />

Whether taste detection of L-glutamate is mediated solely<br />

by the T1R1+T1R3 heterodimer or whether an additional<br />

glutamate-sensing taste transduction mechanism(s) contributes<br />

is controversial. Here, we behaviorally assessed the necessity<br />

of the T1R1 subunit to taste detection of monosodium<br />

glutamate (MSG) in a two-response discrimination procedure<br />

using T1R1 knockout (KO) mice and their same-sex littermate<br />

wild-type (WT) controls. Water-restricted mice were trained<br />

to discriminate a tastant from water with a correct response<br />

resulting in the delivery of a water rein<strong>for</strong>cer and an incorrect<br />

response resulting in a time-out. Sensitivity to NaCl and MSG<br />

was similar between genotypes. However, upon the addition<br />

of the sodium channel blocker amiloride (100 µM) and inosine<br />

5’ monophosphate (IMP), at a concentration (2.5 µM) shown<br />

to potentiate the glutamate signal in a variety of assays,<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of the KO mice to this MSG mixture (M+A+I) was<br />

severely impaired. Whereas WT mice per<strong>for</strong>med at consistently<br />

high levels across concentrations, the ability of the KO mice to<br />

detect the M+A+I solution was above chance only at the higher<br />

MSG concentrations. The possibility that IMP was precluding<br />

concentration-dependent per<strong>for</strong>mance in the WT mice to the<br />

MSG in the presence of amiloride was confirmed when we<br />

found that WT mice could detect 2.5 µM IMP alone with<br />

relatively high accuracy, whereas KO mice could not respond<br />

significantly above chance. Collectively, these results strongly<br />

suggest that 1) the Na + ion dominates the taste detection of MSG<br />

in mice consistent with other recent data from our laboratory,<br />

and 2) glutamate may be activating a T1R1-independent highthreshold<br />

receptor in the presence of IMP, but normal detection<br />

of glutamate depends on the T1R1 subunit. Acknowledgements:<br />

NIH R01-DC004574 (ACS) & NSF GRF to KRS<br />

POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s).<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!