08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and/or bitter taste are expressed not only in gustatory tissues<br />

but also in the intestinal and respiratory epithelia. In this study,<br />

we examined the expression of Pou2f3 in the extra-oral epithelial<br />

chemosensory cells and the impact of Pou2f3 knockout on the<br />

cells. In the intestinal epithelium, the expression of Pou2f3<br />

was observed in the tuft/brush cells that express Plcb2 and<br />

Trpm5 and participate in opioid secretion by chemosensing.<br />

Pou2f3-deficient mice lacked the expression of Plcb2, Trpm5,<br />

and other tuft/brush cell marker genes, but they still expressed<br />

characteristric genes of enteroendocrine cells. In the respiratory<br />

epithelium of the nasal cavity, the expression of Pou2f3 was<br />

observed in the solitary chemosensory cells (SCCs) that express<br />

Tas1r3, Tas2rs, Gnat3, Plcb2, and Trpm5. The expression of<br />

all these genes was lost in the Pou2f3-defficient mice. We also<br />

found Pou2f3 expression in a subset of microvillus cells in the<br />

main olfactory epithelium (MOE) where Trpm5 but not Plcb2,<br />

Ggust, or taste receptors were expressed. Pou2f3-deficient mice<br />

exhibited the lack of Trpm5 expression in the MOE. Taken<br />

together, these data demonstrate that Pou2f3 expression is<br />

associated with the expression of Trpm5 in multiple types<br />

of chemosensory cells, and suggest that Pou2f3 is a master<br />

regulator of differentiation of Trpm5-expressing chemosensory<br />

cells in digestive and respiratory epithelia. 1 Nat. Neurosci.<br />

14, 685-687 (2011)<br />

#P34 POSTER SESSION I:<br />

MULTIMODAL RECEPTION; CHEMOSENSATION<br />

AND DISEASE; OLFACTION PERIPHERY<br />

Aronia Berry Juice Sensory Analysis by Harvest Time and<br />

Oral Sensory Phenotype<br />

Jeeha Park 1 , Shristi Rawal 1 , Mark H Brand 2 , Shelley Durocher 2 ,<br />

Mastaneh Sharafi 1 , Valerie B Duffy 1<br />

1<br />

University of Connecticut/Allied Health <strong>Sciences</strong> Storrs, CT, USA,<br />

2<br />

University of Connecticut/Plant Science and Landscape Architecture<br />

Storrs, CT, USA<br />

Aronia berries (chokeberries) have very high levels of healthpromoting<br />

antioxidants yet can cause a “choking” sensation<br />

due to bitterness and astringency. We aimed to describe oral<br />

sensations and palatability of aronia juice, including variation<br />

by harvest time and oral sensory phenotype. Ripe aronia berries<br />

were harvested at 7 time points and juiced <strong>for</strong> oral sampling<br />

by 50 adults who were phenotyped <strong>for</strong> chemosensory function<br />

by the NHANES protocol, olfactometer, and propylthiouracil<br />

(PROP) bitterness. The adults reported quality intensities of<br />

prototypical tastes, oral chemesthetic compounds, foods, berry<br />

juice and non-oral stimuli, which served as sensory standards.<br />

The juice qualities correlated with alum astringency, quinine<br />

bitterness, and citric acid sourness but, unlike apple or grapefruit<br />

juices, did not correlate with sucrose sweetness. The average<br />

berry juice response was weakly dislike (range—v. strongly<br />

dislike to above moderately like). Astringency was the strongest<br />

sensation, yet sweetness was the primary driver of liking in<br />

multiple regression analysis. Those who liked the juice reported<br />

a greater balance between astringency and either sourness or<br />

sweetness. The juices were more sweet and less sour/astringent<br />

in the middle versus first harvest time, corresponding to greater<br />

acceptance. Classifying by PROP relative to quinine bitterness<br />

identified adults who differed in intensities of prototypical oral<br />

stimuli but not in intensities of odors. Those who perceived more<br />

PROP relative to quinine bitterness also reported the juice as less<br />

sour, less balanced between astringency and sourness, and more<br />

disliked than those who perceived high bitterness from PROP<br />

and quinine. Further study aims to identify ways to maximize<br />

the palatability of aronia juice, individualized to taste phenotype.<br />

Acknowledgements: USDA/Hatch and USDA NE SARE<br />

#P35 POSTER SESSION I:<br />

MULTIMODAL RECEPTION; CHEMOSENSATION<br />

AND DISEASE; OLFACTION PERIPHERY<br />

Temperature of served water can influence sensory perception<br />

and acceptance of subsequent food<br />

Han-Seok Seo 1 , Pauline Mony 1,2 , Tonya Tokar 1 , Peggy Pang 1 ,<br />

Alexandra Fiegel 1 , Jean-François Meullenet 1<br />

1<br />

University of Arkansas/Food Science Fayetteville, AR, USA,<br />

2<br />

French National School of Agricultural Science and Engineering in<br />

Toulouse Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France<br />

The cross-cultural difference in meal pattern exists in the typical<br />

temperature of water served with meals. For example, North<br />

American people, as a whole, are used to drinking iced water/<br />

beverages, while Asian or European people show a preference<br />

<strong>for</strong> hot water/tea or room temperature water, respectively. It has<br />

been proven that food perception and acceptance are affected<br />

by oral temperature, as well as by serving temperature of food.<br />

Based on the fact that the iced or hot water served with meals<br />

can modulate the oral temperature, the present study aimed to<br />

determine if the temperature of served water can modulate the<br />

sensory perception of foods subsequently consumed. Following<br />

a mouth rinse with water served at 4, 20, and 50 °C <strong>for</strong> 5 s,<br />

two types of food: dark chocolate or cheddar cheese were<br />

evaluated in terms of sensory intensity and overall liking. For<br />

the dark chocolate, the intensity ratings <strong>for</strong> sweetness, chocolate<br />

flavor, and creaminess were significantly lower when following<br />

water at 4 °C than when following water at either 20 or 50 °C.<br />

However, the effect of water temperature on sensory perception<br />

was not observed with cheddar cheese. In addition, the overall<br />

liking <strong>for</strong> the dark chocolate was significantly lower when<br />

following water at 4 °C than when following water at either 20<br />

or 50 °C. In conclusion, the current study demonstrates new<br />

empirical evidence that the consumption of iced water can<br />

decrease perceived intensities of sweetness, chocolate flavor,<br />

and creaminess <strong>for</strong> subsequently consumed chocolate. Our<br />

findings suggest a possibility that the North American frequent<br />

consumption of iced water/soda may reduce their sensitivity to<br />

sweet tasting stimuli, thereby leading to the preference <strong>for</strong> more<br />

highly sweetened foods. Acknowledgements: This research was<br />

supported by start-up funding from the University of Arkansas<br />

Division of Agriculture to HS SEO.<br />

POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s).<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!