Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
#P169 POSTER SESSION IV:<br />
CHEMICAL SIGNALING AND BEHAVIOR;<br />
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR/PSYCHOPHYSICS;<br />
CHEMOSENSATION AND METABOLISM;<br />
VOMERONSASAL AND CHEMICAL<br />
COMMUNICATION<br />
#P170 POSTER SESSION IV:<br />
CHEMICAL SIGNALING AND BEHAVIOR;<br />
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR/PSYCHOPHYSICS;<br />
CHEMOSENSATION AND METABOLISM;<br />
VOMERONSASAL AND CHEMICAL<br />
COMMUNICATION<br />
Oral stimulation with sugar elicits cephalic phase insulin<br />
release and improves glucose tolerance in C57BL/6 and<br />
Tas1r3 knock-out mice<br />
John I. Glendinning 1 , Sarah Stano 1 , Olivia Goldman 1 , Danica Yang 1 ,<br />
Robert F. Margolskee 2 , Anthony Sclafani 3 , Joseph R. Vasselli 4<br />
1<br />
Barnard College, Columbia University/Biology Department New<br />
York, NY, USA, 2 Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA,<br />
USA, 3 Brooklyn College of CUNY/Psychology Department Brooklyn,<br />
NY, USA, 4 New York Obesity Nutrition Research Center, St. Luke’s-<br />
Roosevelt Hospital New York, NY, USA<br />
In rats, oral stimulation by sugars elicits cephalic phase insulin<br />
release (CPIR). This CPIR has been found to improve tolerance<br />
to glucose challenges. Here, we asked whether oral stimulation<br />
by glucose has similar effects in C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) mice.<br />
To explore the role of the T1r3 subunit of the heterodimeric<br />
sweet taste receptor (T1r2+T1r3) in this process, we also<br />
examined Tas1r3 knock-out (KO) mice. We subjected all mice<br />
to a 2 g/kg glucose challenge. To this end, we administered a<br />
2.8 M glucose solution either orally (by allowing mice to take<br />
a predetermined number of licks) or post-orally (by injecting<br />
a specific volume into the esophagus by feeding tube). We<br />
collected tail blood immediately prior to glucose administration<br />
(at 0 min), and at subsequent time intervals. In Experiment<br />
1, we measured plasma insulin levels with an ELISA test. We<br />
inferred a CPIR if plasma insulin increased significantly between<br />
the 0 and 5 min measurements. Both strains of mice exhibited<br />
a significant CPIR after oral stimulation, but not after post-oral<br />
stimulation with glucose. The fact that both strains exhibited a<br />
CPIR of similar magnitude indicates that T1r3 is not necessary<br />
<strong>for</strong> eliciting the CPIR. In Experiment 2, we measured blood<br />
glucose levels at 0, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min. We found that both<br />
strains exhibited significantly better glucose tolerance when the<br />
glucose was administered orally than post-orally; the benefit<br />
of oral administration was especially pronounced in the Tas1r3<br />
KO mice. These results indicate that oral stimulation by sugars<br />
elicits a CPIR via a T1r3-independent taste mechanism, and that<br />
this CPIR substantially improves the ability of mice to tolerate<br />
glucose challenges. Acknowledgements: Summer Undergraduate<br />
Research Fellowship Program, Columbia University<br />
As American as Apple Pie Gum: A Study of Satiety<br />
Jack Hirsch 1 , Michele Soto 2 , Alan Hirsch 2<br />
1<br />
Adlai E. Stevenson High School Lincolnshire, IL, USA,<br />
2<br />
Smell & Taste Treatment and Research Foundation Chicago, IL, USA<br />
Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the satiety<br />
value of Wrigley’s Extra Dessert Delight Apple Pie Sugar-Free<br />
Gum as compared to a 100 calorie slice of apple pie. Procedure:<br />
Thirteen girls and 11 boys self-assessed their degree of satiety<br />
on a visual analog scale be<strong>for</strong>e and after chewing Wrigley’s<br />
Extra Dessert Delight Apple Pie Sugar-Free Gum <strong>for</strong> one, 15,<br />
and 30 minutes. This was repeated on a separate day with a 100<br />
calorie slice of Market Pantry Apple Pie (Target) or vice-versa<br />
(the order of presentation being counter balanced). A satiety<br />
value was computed <strong>for</strong> each and statistical significance was<br />
determined <strong>for</strong> difference in satiety index between the two and<br />
effect of order of presentation (pie versus gum first). Conclusion:<br />
No statistically significant difference was seen in satiety value<br />
in response to eating a slice of apple pie or chewing apple<br />
pie-flavored gum (p=0.096). No effect of order presentation was<br />
seen. The gum imbued the same satiety value as apple pie, with<br />
less than 1/20 of the calories. The results suggest that chewing<br />
Wrigley’s Extra Dessert Delight Apple Pie Sugar-Free Gum may<br />
have a role in the promotion of satiety in children as part of a<br />
weight loss program.<br />
#P171 POSTER SESSION IV:<br />
CHEMICAL SIGNALING AND BEHAVIOR;<br />
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR/PSYCHOPHYSICS;<br />
CHEMOSENSATION AND METABOLISM;<br />
VOMERONSASAL AND CHEMICAL<br />
COMMUNICATION<br />
Pre-absorptive insulin release to glutamate taste<br />
Matthew C Kochem 1 , Suzanne M Alarcon 1 , Paul AS Breslin 1,2<br />
1<br />
Rutgers University New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2 Monell Chemical<br />
Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />
Glutamate, like glucose, requires insulin to be transported out<br />
of blood into tissue. Glutamate is detected in the mouth by<br />
taste cells, in the intestine by L-cells and in the pancreas by Beta<br />
cells. In addition, glutamate stimulates glucagon release from<br />
pancreatic alpha cells. It is unknown, however, whether preabsorptive<br />
insulin release (PIR) occurs in response to the taste of<br />
glutamate. The purpose of this study was to determine whether<br />
glutamate causes PIR and whether the magnitude of PIR was<br />
related to glutamate taste sensitivity, which is variable among<br />
individuals. To assess PIR, human subjects tasted and consumed<br />
a glutamate test meal at a dose of 100mg/kg body weight. The<br />
glutamate dose was comprised of a mixture of monosodium<br />
POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />
<strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s).<br />
93