08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

#P131 POSTER SESSION III:<br />

TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />

Genetic Contribution to Binaral Rivalry<br />

Kepu Chen, Bin Zhou, Guo Feng, Wen Zhou<br />

Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of <strong>Sciences</strong> Beijing, China<br />

When two odorants of different structure and smell are<br />

simultaneously presented to the two nostrils, we experience<br />

alternations in olfactory percepts, a recently discovered<br />

phenomenon termed binaral rivalry. In an ef<strong>for</strong>t to further<br />

characterize this phenomenon and its nature, we adopted the<br />

twin method and tested monozygotic (MZ) twins (n = 73 pairs)<br />

that are genetically identical and dizygotic (DZ) twins (n =<br />

70 pairs) that share about half of their genes. The majority of<br />

participants experienced binaral rivalry over a course of 20<br />

samplings of eugenol and amyl acetate, one to each nostril.<br />

Large variances are observed in the number and the magnitude<br />

of their perceptual switches. Critically, such individual<br />

differences are partially genetic. The correlations between MZ<br />

twins <strong>for</strong> the two a<strong>for</strong>ementioned indexes are both higher than<br />

those between DZ twins. The best-fitting genetic models showed<br />

that over 30% of the variances in binaral rivalry rate and binaral<br />

rivalry magnitude, respectively, were accounted <strong>for</strong> by additive<br />

genetic factors. Our study represents the first large sample study<br />

of binaral rivalry. The findings demonstrate a reliable genetic<br />

component of this phenomenon and suggest an innate rhythm of<br />

olfactory perception.<br />

#P132 POSTER SESSION III:<br />

TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />

Olfactory Plasticity in Young Adults<br />

Beverly J. Cowart 1 , Marcia L. Pelchat 1 , Johan N. Lundström 1,2,3 ,<br />

Ryan Craw<strong>for</strong>d 1 , Lydia Milbury 1 , Kathrin Ohla 1,4<br />

1<br />

Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2 Dept. of<br />

Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA,<br />

3<br />

Dept. of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute Stockholm,<br />

Sweden, 4 German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke<br />

Nuthetal, Germany<br />

There is considerable evidence that olfaction is, in many ways,<br />

a “learned” sense, showing experience-induced plasticity in<br />

both central circuits and peripheral receptors even in adulthood.<br />

Although this has been demonstrated in humans, the focus<br />

has been on single chemicals to which some individuals are<br />

initially insensitive. We sought to explore (1) the possibility of<br />

enhancing young adult sensitivity to complex odors, (2) the role<br />

of cognitive engagement (active identification of exposed odors<br />

vs. simple exposure), and (3) the extent of transfer of learning to<br />

unexposed odors. For this, we obtained both odor thresholds and<br />

olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs) from 40 young adults<br />

in an attempt to assess the neuronal mechanisms of potential<br />

behavioral changes. Thresholds <strong>for</strong> four exposed and two<br />

unexposed complex odorants were obtained at baseline, 6 and<br />

12 weeks; OERPs in response to two of the exposed and both<br />

unexposed odorants were obtained at baseline and 12 weeks.<br />

Our behavioral results suggest that intermittent odor exposure<br />

in these circumstances does enhance threshold sensitivity and<br />

that cognitive engagement may further enhance generalization<br />

to unexposed odorants. Our electrophysiological results show<br />

learning-dependent amplitude changes, particularly of the late<br />

positive component. Taken together, these data provide further<br />

support <strong>for</strong> the notion that repeated exposure augments olfactory<br />

sensitivity and that cognitive mechanisms exert a significant<br />

modulatory effect. Acknowledgements: Supported by the U.S.<br />

Army Research Office, grant #W911NF-11-1-0087.<br />

#P133 POSTER SESSION III:<br />

TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />

Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry<br />

Melanie Y Denzer 1 , Jonathan Beauchamp 2 , David W Kern 3 , Stefan<br />

Gailer 2 , Norbert Thuerauf 4 , Johannes Kornhuber 4 , Andrea Buettner 1,2<br />

1<br />

Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Emil Fischer Center,<br />

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen, Germany, 2 Department<br />

of Sensory Analytics, Fraunhofer Institute <strong>for</strong> Process Engineering<br />

and Packaging IVV Freising, Germany, 3 Department of Comparative<br />

Human Development, Institute <strong>for</strong> Mind and Biology, University<br />

of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA, 4 Department of Psychiatry and<br />

Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen Erlangen, Germany<br />

Since their introduction in the mid-1990s, Sniffin’ Sticks have<br />

been used effectively by many otolaryngologists to assess<br />

olfactory dysfunction in countless patients. Despite their<br />

widespread use, however, there is currently a lack of data on<br />

the actual odorant concentrations released from the tips of<br />

these pens and whether these emitted concentrations scale<br />

linearly in accordance with the odorant concentrations of the<br />

pen set. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether the<br />

Sniffin’ Sticks’ presumed odorant release was concordant with<br />

the concentration of the odorant solutions placed in the pens.<br />

The commercially-available odour threshold test containing<br />

n-butanol was chosen here <strong>for</strong> evaluation. The threshold set<br />

contains concentrations (v/v) ranging from 4 % (pen no. 1)<br />

to 1.2 ppm v<br />

(pen no. 16), with stepwise 1:2 dilutions. We also<br />

tested an additional custom-made pen containing 8 % n-butanol<br />

(pen no. 0). The odorant concentration emanating from the tip<br />

of each pen was measured directly via proton-transfer-reaction<br />

mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), which is an on-line analytical tool<br />

<strong>for</strong> detection and quantitation of volatile organic compounds<br />

(VOCs) – including odorants – at trace concentrations. The pens<br />

were also subjected to repeated use to ascertain the degree of<br />

reproducibility of emitted odorant concentrations under stress.<br />

These measurements showed that the concentration linearity of<br />

n-butanol emitted over the range of pens was excellent and highly<br />

reproducible. The stress tests demonstrated that the emitted<br />

concentrations of n-butanol were lower after repeated use of the<br />

pens compared to those of the unused pens, albeit with a mostly<br />

good linearity over the entire range of pens. Acknowledgements:<br />

Part of this study is affiliated with the Neurotrition Project,<br />

which is supported by the FAU Emerging Fields Initiative. This<br />

POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s).<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!