08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

#P145 POSTER SESSION III:<br />

TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />

Perception of large and small odorant molecules –<br />

A study investigating the olfactory perception as a<br />

function of age and odorant molecular size<br />

Laura Puschmann, Charlotte Sinding, Thomas Hummel<br />

Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology,<br />

University of Dresden Medical School Dresden, Germany<br />

For various sensory systems selective functional limitations with<br />

increasing age were detected. In vision and hearing it shows in<br />

hyperopia or an increased hearing threshold <strong>for</strong> high frequencies.<br />

But what about the olfactory system? While some studies suggest<br />

a general olfactory impairment, others allow assumptions of<br />

partial processes. In this study the influence of odorant molecular<br />

size was examined <strong>for</strong> the olfactory perception in different ages.<br />

Olfactory threshold tests were conducted at two age groups<br />

(group 1: 18 to 30 years, group 2: 50 to 70 years). We used single<br />

odorants, bimolecular odorants and perfumes, each consisting of<br />

large or small molecules. The results of these studies showed no<br />

differences <strong>for</strong> large and small odorant molecules in the young<br />

group of subjects. Whereas they were perceived differently by the<br />

50 to 70 year-old. The latter had significantly higher thresholds<br />

<strong>for</strong> large olfactory molecules. This phenomenon however, was<br />

detected only <strong>for</strong> mono- and bimolecular odorants. Perfumes<br />

were perceived similar in both groups. In Conclusion we can<br />

hypothesize differing processes <strong>for</strong> odor perception of small and<br />

big odorant molecules in different age-groups at the receptor<br />

level. Moreover perfumes seem to generate more complex<br />

olfactory in<strong>for</strong>mation. The existence of partial processes on<br />

olfactory impairment with increasing age is expected <strong>for</strong> the<br />

olfactory system, too. Acknowledgements: This project was<br />

supported by a grant from DFG Schwerpunktprogramm (SPP)<br />

1392 - Integrative Analysis of Olfaction to Thomas Hummel. In<br />

addition we thank Fragrance Resources GmbH, Hamburg <strong>for</strong><br />

cooperation.<br />

#P146 POSTER SESSION III:<br />

TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />

Odor Identification and Cognition in a Nationally<br />

Representative Sample of Older Adults<br />

L. Philip Schumm 1 , David W. Kern 2 , Kristen E. Wroblewski 1 , Jayant<br />

M. Pinto 3 , Ashwin A. Kotwal 4 , William Dale 4 , Martha K. McClintock 2<br />

1<br />

Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago Chicago, IL,<br />

USA, 2 Comparative Human Development and Institute <strong>for</strong> Mind<br />

and Biology, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA, 3 Section of<br />

Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery,<br />

University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA, 4 Department of Medicine,<br />

Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago<br />

Chicago, IL, USA<br />

Errors in odor identification are associated with subsequent<br />

cognitive impairment in populations clinically at risk <strong>for</strong><br />

Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. However, such associations<br />

have not been investigated in the general U.S. population.<br />

We administered a 5-item test of odor identification to a U.S.<br />

national probability sample of 3,005 community-dwelling adults<br />

aged 57–85 in 2005–6 (Wave 1); respondents and their spouses<br />

were then retested in 2010–1 (Wave 2). Odors were presented<br />

using Sniffin’ Sticks, and respondents were asked to identify<br />

each from among four word-picture options. Respondents<br />

in Wave 2 also completed the Chicago Cognitive Function<br />

Measure (C-CFM), a survey instrument assessing eight distinct<br />

cognitive domains, derived from the Montreal Cognitive<br />

Assessment (MoCA). The C-CFM is 30% faster, with scores<br />

ranging from 0–20 (mean = 13.5, SD = 4.1) that correlate highly<br />

with the MoCA (r = 0.97). In a multiple regression model of<br />

C-CFM on odor identification score in Wave 2 (n = 2,076),<br />

each additional odor identification error was associated with<br />

a reduction in C-CFM score of 0.61 (95% CI = (0.44, 0.77); p<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!