Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
#P145 POSTER SESSION III:<br />
TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />
PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />
Perception of large and small odorant molecules –<br />
A study investigating the olfactory perception as a<br />
function of age and odorant molecular size<br />
Laura Puschmann, Charlotte Sinding, Thomas Hummel<br />
Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology,<br />
University of Dresden Medical School Dresden, Germany<br />
For various sensory systems selective functional limitations with<br />
increasing age were detected. In vision and hearing it shows in<br />
hyperopia or an increased hearing threshold <strong>for</strong> high frequencies.<br />
But what about the olfactory system? While some studies suggest<br />
a general olfactory impairment, others allow assumptions of<br />
partial processes. In this study the influence of odorant molecular<br />
size was examined <strong>for</strong> the olfactory perception in different ages.<br />
Olfactory threshold tests were conducted at two age groups<br />
(group 1: 18 to 30 years, group 2: 50 to 70 years). We used single<br />
odorants, bimolecular odorants and perfumes, each consisting of<br />
large or small molecules. The results of these studies showed no<br />
differences <strong>for</strong> large and small odorant molecules in the young<br />
group of subjects. Whereas they were perceived differently by the<br />
50 to 70 year-old. The latter had significantly higher thresholds<br />
<strong>for</strong> large olfactory molecules. This phenomenon however, was<br />
detected only <strong>for</strong> mono- and bimolecular odorants. Perfumes<br />
were perceived similar in both groups. In Conclusion we can<br />
hypothesize differing processes <strong>for</strong> odor perception of small and<br />
big odorant molecules in different age-groups at the receptor<br />
level. Moreover perfumes seem to generate more complex<br />
olfactory in<strong>for</strong>mation. The existence of partial processes on<br />
olfactory impairment with increasing age is expected <strong>for</strong> the<br />
olfactory system, too. Acknowledgements: This project was<br />
supported by a grant from DFG Schwerpunktprogramm (SPP)<br />
1392 - Integrative Analysis of Olfaction to Thomas Hummel. In<br />
addition we thank Fragrance Resources GmbH, Hamburg <strong>for</strong><br />
cooperation.<br />
#P146 POSTER SESSION III:<br />
TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />
PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />
Odor Identification and Cognition in a Nationally<br />
Representative Sample of Older Adults<br />
L. Philip Schumm 1 , David W. Kern 2 , Kristen E. Wroblewski 1 , Jayant<br />
M. Pinto 3 , Ashwin A. Kotwal 4 , William Dale 4 , Martha K. McClintock 2<br />
1<br />
Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago Chicago, IL,<br />
USA, 2 Comparative Human Development and Institute <strong>for</strong> Mind<br />
and Biology, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA, 3 Section of<br />
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery,<br />
University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA, 4 Department of Medicine,<br />
Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago<br />
Chicago, IL, USA<br />
Errors in odor identification are associated with subsequent<br />
cognitive impairment in populations clinically at risk <strong>for</strong><br />
Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. However, such associations<br />
have not been investigated in the general U.S. population.<br />
We administered a 5-item test of odor identification to a U.S.<br />
national probability sample of 3,005 community-dwelling adults<br />
aged 57–85 in 2005–6 (Wave 1); respondents and their spouses<br />
were then retested in 2010–1 (Wave 2). Odors were presented<br />
using Sniffin’ Sticks, and respondents were asked to identify<br />
each from among four word-picture options. Respondents<br />
in Wave 2 also completed the Chicago Cognitive Function<br />
Measure (C-CFM), a survey instrument assessing eight distinct<br />
cognitive domains, derived from the Montreal Cognitive<br />
Assessment (MoCA). The C-CFM is 30% faster, with scores<br />
ranging from 0–20 (mean = 13.5, SD = 4.1) that correlate highly<br />
with the MoCA (r = 0.97). In a multiple regression model of<br />
C-CFM on odor identification score in Wave 2 (n = 2,076),<br />
each additional odor identification error was associated with<br />
a reduction in C-CFM score of 0.61 (95% CI = (0.44, 0.77); p<br />