Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
women; mean age 23.4 years; range 20-29 years) were examined.<br />
Normal olfactory function was ascertained using the “Sniffin<br />
Sticks”. All subjects rated peach odor as pleasant, and the smell<br />
of butanol as unpleasant. According to their hedonic judgement<br />
of liquorice odor, subjects were divided into two groups: group<br />
1 subjects described the odor of liquorice as pleasant, and group<br />
2 subjects experienced liquorice as unpleasant. Functional<br />
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to compare the<br />
cerebral activations while smelling the three different odors:<br />
pleasant peach, unpleasant butanol, and ambiguous liquorice.<br />
Analysis indicated common neural activations in response to<br />
all odors in a number of regions, e.g. in cingulate gyrus, medial<br />
frontal gyrus and caudate nucleus. In subjects disliking liquorice,<br />
activations were found in four areas including medial frontal<br />
gyrus, postcentral gyrus and medial temporal gyrus. In liquoriceliking<br />
subjects, activations were found in the medial frontal<br />
lobe. These results suggest that there are different patterns of<br />
central nervous activation dependent on the hedonic value of an<br />
odor, mainly including the frontal lobe, with unpleasant odors<br />
activating the more lateral frontal lobe and pleasant odors more<br />
medial areas. In addition, unpleasant odors produced more<br />
activation as compared to pleasant odors. Acknowledgements:<br />
Supported by Takasago, Paris.<br />
#P57 POSTER SESSION II:<br />
OLFACTION DEVELOPMENT; TASTE CNS;<br />
NEUROIMAGING; OLFACTION CNS<br />
Valence Modulation of Crossmodal Olfactory-Visual<br />
Neural Integration<br />
Jessica Freiherr 1 , Anna-Nora zur Nieden 1 2, 3, 4<br />
, Johan N. Lundström<br />
1<br />
RWTH Aachen University, Diagnostic and Interventional<br />
Neuroradiology Aachen, Germany, 2 Monell Chemical Senses Center<br />
Philadelphia, PA, USA, 3 University of Pennsylvania, Department of<br />
Psychology Philadelphia, PA, USA, 4 Karolinska Institute, Department<br />
of Clinical Neuroscience Stockholm, Sweden<br />
We recently demonstrated that a concurring congruent visual<br />
stimulus does not affect olfactory sensitivity but does modulate<br />
the perceived valence or pleasantness and intensity of an odor.<br />
However, the congruency-dependent effect occurred only <strong>for</strong><br />
odors perceived as pleasant. With the current study we explored<br />
the neural mechanisms of this behavioral phenomenon with<br />
the aim of determining the influence of valence on the neural<br />
correlates of crossmodal olfactory-visual integration. To this<br />
end, the pleasant odor phenyl ethyl alcohol and unpleasant odor<br />
isovaleric acid was applied using constant-flow olfactometry<br />
in combination with a congruent, incongruent, or blank visual<br />
stimulus during an event-related fMRI paradigm. As control<br />
stimuli we also applied pleasant and unpleasant visual stimuli<br />
and a baseline stimulus. We investigated brain activation due to<br />
crossmodal integration in 14 healthy, normosmic participants.<br />
Subjects had to rate pleasantness of the odors after each<br />
event. Statistical analyses of the behavioral data demonstrate<br />
a replication of the a<strong>for</strong>ementioned findings. As predicted,<br />
valence-independent olfactory-visual integration was mediated<br />
by low-level multisensory integration areas in the superior<br />
parietal lobule. Preliminary analyses of the fMRI data indicate<br />
that valence-dependent integration occurs in higher-order<br />
multisensory integration areas in conjunction with areas known<br />
to code <strong>for</strong> odor valence. Moreover, a differential processing<br />
of unpleasant compared to pleasant olfactory-visual stimulus<br />
combinations has been established. Further insights into the<br />
neural processes mediating the influence of valence on the<br />
neural correlates of olfactory-visual integration will be discussed.<br />
Acknowledgements: Funded by a startup grant from the Medical<br />
Faculty of RWTH Aachen University.<br />
#P58 POSTER SESSION II:<br />
OLFACTION DEVELOPMENT; TASTE CNS;<br />
NEUROIMAGING; OLFACTION CNS<br />
Visuo-olfactory integration facilitates peri-threshold<br />
olfactory categorization<br />
Jaryd Hiser 1 , Lucas R. Novak 1 , Wen Li 1,2<br />
1<br />
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin - Madison<br />
Madison, WI, USA, 2 Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin -<br />
Madison Madison, WI, USA<br />
Olfactory quality discrimination and categorization proves<br />
a highly challenging process in humans. Additional in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
from other senses, such as visual cues, may facilitate this<br />
operation via crossmodal integration. To date, crossmodal<br />
sensory integration has focused on non-chemical senses. Using<br />
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques,<br />
this study characterized visuo-olfactory integration in olfactory<br />
categorization. Participants (N=29) smelled an odor at a merely<br />
detectable level from one of three categories (food, floral, or<br />
wood) while viewing a picture that was congruent or incongruent<br />
to the odor, and then made a category decision on the odor.<br />
Reaction time (RT) was faster <strong>for</strong> congruent versus incongruent<br />
stimuli (P