08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

women; mean age 23.4 years; range 20-29 years) were examined.<br />

Normal olfactory function was ascertained using the “Sniffin<br />

Sticks”. All subjects rated peach odor as pleasant, and the smell<br />

of butanol as unpleasant. According to their hedonic judgement<br />

of liquorice odor, subjects were divided into two groups: group<br />

1 subjects described the odor of liquorice as pleasant, and group<br />

2 subjects experienced liquorice as unpleasant. Functional<br />

magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to compare the<br />

cerebral activations while smelling the three different odors:<br />

pleasant peach, unpleasant butanol, and ambiguous liquorice.<br />

Analysis indicated common neural activations in response to<br />

all odors in a number of regions, e.g. in cingulate gyrus, medial<br />

frontal gyrus and caudate nucleus. In subjects disliking liquorice,<br />

activations were found in four areas including medial frontal<br />

gyrus, postcentral gyrus and medial temporal gyrus. In liquoriceliking<br />

subjects, activations were found in the medial frontal<br />

lobe. These results suggest that there are different patterns of<br />

central nervous activation dependent on the hedonic value of an<br />

odor, mainly including the frontal lobe, with unpleasant odors<br />

activating the more lateral frontal lobe and pleasant odors more<br />

medial areas. In addition, unpleasant odors produced more<br />

activation as compared to pleasant odors. Acknowledgements:<br />

Supported by Takasago, Paris.<br />

#P57 POSTER SESSION II:<br />

OLFACTION DEVELOPMENT; TASTE CNS;<br />

NEUROIMAGING; OLFACTION CNS<br />

Valence Modulation of Crossmodal Olfactory-Visual<br />

Neural Integration<br />

Jessica Freiherr 1 , Anna-Nora zur Nieden 1 2, 3, 4<br />

, Johan N. Lundström<br />

1<br />

RWTH Aachen University, Diagnostic and Interventional<br />

Neuroradiology Aachen, Germany, 2 Monell Chemical Senses Center<br />

Philadelphia, PA, USA, 3 University of Pennsylvania, Department of<br />

Psychology Philadelphia, PA, USA, 4 Karolinska Institute, Department<br />

of Clinical Neuroscience Stockholm, Sweden<br />

We recently demonstrated that a concurring congruent visual<br />

stimulus does not affect olfactory sensitivity but does modulate<br />

the perceived valence or pleasantness and intensity of an odor.<br />

However, the congruency-dependent effect occurred only <strong>for</strong><br />

odors perceived as pleasant. With the current study we explored<br />

the neural mechanisms of this behavioral phenomenon with<br />

the aim of determining the influence of valence on the neural<br />

correlates of crossmodal olfactory-visual integration. To this<br />

end, the pleasant odor phenyl ethyl alcohol and unpleasant odor<br />

isovaleric acid was applied using constant-flow olfactometry<br />

in combination with a congruent, incongruent, or blank visual<br />

stimulus during an event-related fMRI paradigm. As control<br />

stimuli we also applied pleasant and unpleasant visual stimuli<br />

and a baseline stimulus. We investigated brain activation due to<br />

crossmodal integration in 14 healthy, normosmic participants.<br />

Subjects had to rate pleasantness of the odors after each<br />

event. Statistical analyses of the behavioral data demonstrate<br />

a replication of the a<strong>for</strong>ementioned findings. As predicted,<br />

valence-independent olfactory-visual integration was mediated<br />

by low-level multisensory integration areas in the superior<br />

parietal lobule. Preliminary analyses of the fMRI data indicate<br />

that valence-dependent integration occurs in higher-order<br />

multisensory integration areas in conjunction with areas known<br />

to code <strong>for</strong> odor valence. Moreover, a differential processing<br />

of unpleasant compared to pleasant olfactory-visual stimulus<br />

combinations has been established. Further insights into the<br />

neural processes mediating the influence of valence on the<br />

neural correlates of olfactory-visual integration will be discussed.<br />

Acknowledgements: Funded by a startup grant from the Medical<br />

Faculty of RWTH Aachen University.<br />

#P58 POSTER SESSION II:<br />

OLFACTION DEVELOPMENT; TASTE CNS;<br />

NEUROIMAGING; OLFACTION CNS<br />

Visuo-olfactory integration facilitates peri-threshold<br />

olfactory categorization<br />

Jaryd Hiser 1 , Lucas R. Novak 1 , Wen Li 1,2<br />

1<br />

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin - Madison<br />

Madison, WI, USA, 2 Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin -<br />

Madison Madison, WI, USA<br />

Olfactory quality discrimination and categorization proves<br />

a highly challenging process in humans. Additional in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

from other senses, such as visual cues, may facilitate this<br />

operation via crossmodal integration. To date, crossmodal<br />

sensory integration has focused on non-chemical senses. Using<br />

functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques,<br />

this study characterized visuo-olfactory integration in olfactory<br />

categorization. Participants (N=29) smelled an odor at a merely<br />

detectable level from one of three categories (food, floral, or<br />

wood) while viewing a picture that was congruent or incongruent<br />

to the odor, and then made a category decision on the odor.<br />

Reaction time (RT) was faster <strong>for</strong> congruent versus incongruent<br />

stimuli (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!