08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

generalist and specialized species can be found that collect<br />

pollen and nectar either from many plant families (polylectic)<br />

or from only few species (oligolectic). In some cases, both types<br />

of food preferences can be found within the same genus, like in<br />

the mason bee genus Osmia. Here we investigate how the floral<br />

preference is reflected in the neuroanatomy of the olfactory<br />

system. We employed confocal microscopy scanning and<br />

3D-reconstruction <strong>for</strong> quantitative analyses of major neuropile<br />

volumes. We counted the number of functional units (glomeruli)<br />

within the antennal lobe, the first olfactory neuropile in insects,<br />

and quantified synaptic structures in higher-order sensory<br />

integration centers (mushroom bodies). The investigated Osmia<br />

species showed significant differences in selected neuropile<br />

volumes and also a large interspecies variance in glomerular<br />

numbers, correlated to floral preference. The strictly oligolectic<br />

species Osmia adunca showed the smallest number of glomeruli,<br />

whereas all polylectic species showed larger glomerular numbers.<br />

The mushroom bodies of polylectic and oligolectic species<br />

showed the same density of synaptic structures, but expressed<br />

significant volume differences in the subregions that process<br />

olfactory in<strong>for</strong>mation. Chemical analyzes of host-plant odors<br />

and behavioral tests will be next steps to understand the large<br />

impact of floral preference on the complexity of the olfactory<br />

system in bees. Acknowledgements: DFG KE-1701 1/1<br />

#P100 POSTER SESSION II:<br />

OLFACTION DEVELOPMENT; TASTE CNS;<br />

NEUROIMAGING; OLFACTION CNS<br />

Temporal-spatial trans<strong>for</strong>mation in the piri<strong>for</strong>m cortex<br />

Alex Koulakov 1 , Honi Sanders 2 , Brian Kolterman 1 , Dima Rinberg 3 ,<br />

John Lisman 1<br />

1<br />

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA,<br />

2<br />

Brandeis University Waltham, MA, USA, 3 New York University<br />

New York, NY, USA<br />

Mitral cells of the olfactory bulb respond to stimuli with<br />

brief and temporally precise transient changes in the firing<br />

rate (sharp events) that tile the inhalation cycle. This suggests<br />

that in<strong>for</strong>mation about odorants can be encoded by the<br />

temporal sequence of these events. Here we propose a class of<br />

computational models <strong>for</strong> the olfactory cortex that can detect<br />

such sequences and convert them into a spatial pattern that<br />

can be recognized by standard attractor networks. We propose<br />

that the olfactory cortex contains groups of cells that can be<br />

sequentially activated by inputs from mitral cells synchronized at<br />

different phases of the respiratory cycle. Neurons in each group<br />

can be persistently activated by virtue of, <strong>for</strong> example, an intrinsic<br />

bistability mechanism. The pattern of activation of neurons<br />

in each group carries a snapshot of coincidences in mitral cell<br />

sharp events at a particular phase of the breathing cycle. Due to<br />

long-range intracortical connectivity, the activation of one group<br />

“enables” bistability in another group which can then <strong>for</strong>m a<br />

snapshot of mitral cell activity at a later phase of the respiratory<br />

cycle. In this way, persistent activation of groups of neuron<br />

occurs sequentially, each in turn representing the olfactory bulb<br />

activity at a certain phase of the sequence. We further show that<br />

sharp events in mitral cell responses occur at a preferred phase of<br />

gamma cycles (measured in the field potential). Given that there<br />

are only a few gamma cycles within a sniff, the number of groups<br />

needed to define gamma cycle specific snapshots of an odorant<br />

is not large. Recognition may occur when the spatial pattern<br />

becomes sufficient to distinguish among the potential odorants.<br />

#P101 POSTER SESSION II:<br />

OLFACTION DEVELOPMENT; TASTE CNS;<br />

NEUROIMAGING; OLFACTION CNS<br />

Unique Cholinergic Interneuron Populations in the Mouse<br />

Accessory Olfactory Bulb: Neurochemical Expression and<br />

Fiber Density<br />

Kurt Krosnowski, Sarah Ashby, Weihong Lin<br />

University of Maryland Baltimore County Baltimore, MD, USA<br />

The accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) is a primary central<br />

processing site of sensory in<strong>for</strong>mation detected via the<br />

vomeronasal organ. The AOB contains diverse populations of<br />

intrinsic interneurons. We detected a largely unidentified choline<br />

acetyltransferase-expressing (ChAT) cholinergic interneuron<br />

population using ChAT (BAC) -eGFP mice. Here we classified<br />

their neurochemical expression and distribution throughout<br />

the AOB. We then determined if this cholinergic interneuron<br />

population differs from other known populations of interneurons<br />

in the AOB and main olfactory bulb (MOB). Similar to the<br />

MOB (Krosnowski et al 2012), we found that all cholinergic<br />

interneurons are neither dopaminergic nor GABAergic. While<br />

most ChAT expressing cells in the external plexi<strong>for</strong>m layer (EPL)<br />

of the AOB are not glutamatergic, we found some coexpression<br />

between ChAT-GFP and GluR2/3, a glutamatergic marker, in<br />

contrast with results obtained from the MOB. Also, unlike the<br />

cholinergic interneuron population in the MOB, the majority of<br />

cholinergic interneurons in the AOB do not express a calcium<br />

binding protein, calbindin-D28K. Further, clear differences can<br />

be seen between cholinergic nerve fibers in the internal plexi<strong>for</strong>m<br />

layer (IPL) of the MOB and the AOB. Unlike in the MOB,<br />

where the highest density of cholinergic nerve fibers was found<br />

in the IPL, in the AOB, the IPL contains the fewest visible fibers.<br />

Instead, the majority of cholinergic fibers in the AOB are found<br />

in the EPL. Thus, our data supports the idea that the intrinsic<br />

cholinergic interneuron populations in the AOB are distinct<br />

from previously identified interneuron populations in both<br />

the MOB and AOB and this suggests that they play a unique<br />

role in signal processing in the accessory olfactory system.<br />

Acknowledgements: NIH/NIDCD 009269, 012831 and ARRA<br />

administrative supplement to WL<br />

POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s).<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!