08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

#P63 POSTER SESSION II:<br />

OLFACTION DEVELOPMENT; TASTE CNS;<br />

NEUROIMAGING; OLFACTION CNS<br />

#P64 POSTER SESSION II:<br />

OLFACTION DEVELOPMENT; TASTE CNS;<br />

NEUROIMAGING; OLFACTION CNS<br />

Is the Superior Temporal Sulcus involved in the Rein<strong>for</strong>ced<br />

Configural Processing of a Binary Odor Mixture?<br />

Charlotte Sinding 1,2 , Gérard Coureaud 1 , Noëlle Béno 1 , Elodie Le Berre 1 ,<br />

Cornelia Hummel 2 , John Prescott 3 , Moustafa Bensafi 4 ,<br />

Thomas Hummel 2 , Thierry Thomas-Danguin 1<br />

1<br />

Centre des <strong>Sciences</strong> du Goût et de l’Alimentation (CSGA), UMR 6265<br />

CNRS, UMR 1324 INRA, Université de Bourgogne, Developmental<br />

Ethology and Cognitive Psychology Team and Flavour Perception<br />

Team Dijon, France, 2 Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of<br />

Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School Dresden,<br />

Germany, 3 TasteMatters Research & Consulting Sydney, Australia,<br />

4<br />

Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, UMR5020 CNRS,<br />

Université Lyon 1, Neurosciences Sensorielles Comportement Cognition<br />

Lyon, France<br />

In macaque monkeys the superior temporal sulcus (STS)<br />

projects to the orbitofrontal cortex which projects to the<br />

primary olfactory cortex (Carmichael and Price 1995). These<br />

connections are believed to be reciprocal, there<strong>for</strong>e the STS is<br />

supposed to receive inputs from olfactory areas. Kettenmann<br />

et al. (1996) showed that STS was activated when participants<br />

were stimulated with monomolecular odors. This area is also<br />

specifically activated <strong>for</strong> configural visual processing, as during<br />

the perception of body motion (Thompson et al. 2005). In the<br />

present study, we investigated the configural processing of odor<br />

mixtures in human adults. We repeatedly exposed (2 sessions of<br />

11 exposures) healthy volunteers (n=12, G AB<br />

) to a binary mixture<br />

(AB) configurally processed (blending of the two components’<br />

odors into a single pineapple odor), while others (n=14, G compo<br />

)<br />

were exposed to the separate components, A (“strawberry”)<br />

and B (“caramel”). To equilibrate the number of exposures in<br />

the two groups, G AB<br />

was also exposed to PEA (monomolecular,<br />

“rose”). Such exposures were known to favor the perception of<br />

the AB configuration in G AB<br />

and the perception of the elements<br />

in G compo<br />

(Sinding et al. 2011, in preparation). Two days after<br />

the pre-exposure, all subjects received an fMRI while stimulated<br />

by AB, A, B and PEA. As a major result, the STS appeared<br />

significantly more activated <strong>for</strong> the processing of the AB mixture<br />

in G AB<br />

than in G compo<br />

. The STS was also more activated <strong>for</strong> the<br />

processing of AB as compared to A and B, in G AB<br />

. The STS was<br />

not significantly activated in G compo<br />

<strong>for</strong> any stimulation, in any<br />

contrast. These results suggest that the STS is a critical area <strong>for</strong><br />

the rein<strong>for</strong>ced configural processing of simple odorant mixtures.<br />

However, PEA also activated significantly the STS in G AB<br />

in<br />

comparison to G compo<br />

. Acknowledgements: Supported by grants<br />

from the Burgundy Regional council and EU-ERDF to GC and<br />

TTD, European Dijon-Dresden Laboratory (LEA 549) to TH,<br />

GC, TTD, and a fellowship from the French MESR to CS.<br />

<strong>Association</strong> of Pleasantness and Intensity of Sweet and<br />

Salty Taste in the Human Brain<br />

Jianli Wang 1 , Sebastian Rupprecht 1 , Zachary Mosher 1 ,<br />

Robert Mchugh 1 , Jeffrey Vesek 1 , Sarah Ryan 1 , Megha Vasavada 1 ,<br />

Qing X. Yang 1,2 , Andras Hajnal 3,4 , Ann M. Rogers 4<br />

1<br />

Penn State College of Medicine/Radiology Hershey, PA, USA,<br />

2<br />

Penn State College of Medicine/Neurosurgery Hershey, PA, USA,<br />

3<br />

Penn State College of Medicine/Neural & Behavioral <strong>Sciences</strong> Hershey,<br />

PA, USA, 4 Penn State College of Medicine/Surgery Hershey, PA, USA<br />

An abnormal assessment of pleasantness and intensity of<br />

tastants can lead to negative, long-term health conditions.<br />

Among these, obesity may be a consequence of diminished<br />

sensitivity to sweet tastes, leading to amplified cravings and<br />

associated weight gains. An understanding of the neural<br />

processes of taste perception is essential <strong>for</strong> elucidating this<br />

disease state. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, studies on the human brain are<br />

limited, and thus the majority of neural taste function knowledge<br />

stems from animal studies. These studies have shown that<br />

hedonic and intensity in<strong>for</strong>mation is encoded in the primary<br />

gustatory cortex, with neuronal firing correlated with stimulation<br />

intensity. Seeking to confirm animal models in the human<br />

brain, this study utilized fMRI to study BOLD signal changes<br />

in response to varied concentrations of sweet and salty taste<br />

stimulants. Normal, healthy volunteers (n=11) completed a<br />

total of fifteen taste fMRI studies in which brain response to an<br />

event-related taste stimulation paradigm was correlated with<br />

perceived ratings of both pleasantness and intensity. The data<br />

indicate a positive correlation between pleasantness and intensity<br />

<strong>for</strong> sweet tastants; while a negative correlation was observed <strong>for</strong><br />

salty tastants. Each triggered significant activation in the primary<br />

and secondary gustatory cortices including: bilateral anterior<br />

insular cortex, posterior orbitofrontal cortex, cingulated cortex,<br />

and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. BOLD signals in these regions<br />

were significantly correlated with both hedonic and intensity<br />

ratings from subjects. Overall these results show that the human<br />

brain processes hedonic and intensity in<strong>for</strong>mation of sweet and<br />

salty taste through similar neural networks previously seen in<br />

animal models.<br />

POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s).<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!