08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

nerve fibers. Nasal SCCs respond to bitter compounds including<br />

bacterially-produced molecules, to evoke protective respiratory<br />

reflexes and early inflammatory responses (Gulbransen 2008,<br />

Tizzano 2010 and AChemS 2012). Here we test whether SCCmediated<br />

pro-inflammatory responses require activation of the<br />

trigeminal nerve and subsequent peptidergic neurotransmission,<br />

or whether SCC activation triggers local inflammation via<br />

an intramucosal paracrine signaling mechanism. When<br />

denatonium (10mM) is instilled into the nasal passageways,<br />

it evokes SCC-dependent plasma leakage and local mast cell<br />

(MC) degranulation (Tizzano AChemS 2012). Chemical<br />

ablation of peptidergic nerve fibers with resiniferatoxin (RTX,<br />

an ultrapotent analog of capsaicin) eliminates both denatoniummediated<br />

plasma leakage and MC degranulation. These results<br />

show that the peptidergic nerve fibers are necessary <strong>for</strong> these<br />

SCC-mediated pro-inflammatory events. Moreover, injection of<br />

L732138 (5mg/kg), an inhibitor of the neurokinin 1 (substance<br />

P) receptor present on blood vessels, prevents denatoniuminduced<br />

plasma leakage. This indicates that substance P is the<br />

mediator <strong>for</strong> plasma leakage. Our results demonstrate that<br />

activation of the SCCs leads to a rapid, local pro-inflammatory<br />

response via neurogenic mechanisms. This fast pro-inflammatory<br />

response, driven by the SCCs in conjunction with the trigeminal<br />

nerve, represents a 1st line of defense against respiratory<br />

epithelial assault by noxious chemicals and bacterial pathogens.<br />

Acknowledgements: NIDCD R03 DC012413 (M.T.), R01<br />

DC009820 (T.E.F.), and P30 DC04657 (to D. Restrepo)<br />

#P124 POSTER SESSION III:<br />

TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />

The Influence of Bubbles on the Perception of<br />

Carbonation Bite<br />

Paul M Wise 1 , Stephen R Thom 2 , Madeline Wolf 1 , Bruce Bryant 1<br />

1<br />

Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA,<br />

2<br />

University of Pennsylvania/Institute <strong>for</strong> Environmental Medicine<br />

Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />

Although many people assume that the bite of carbonation is due<br />

to tactile stimulation of the oral cavity by bubbles, it has become<br />

increasingly clear that carbonation bite comes mainly from<br />

<strong>for</strong>mation of carbonic acid in the oral mucosa. In Experiment<br />

1, we asked whether bubbles were in fact required to perceive<br />

carbonation bite. Subjects rated oral pungency from several<br />

concentrations of carbonated water both at normal atmospheric<br />

pressure (at which bubbles could <strong>for</strong>m) and at 2.0 atmospheres<br />

pressure (at which bubbles did not <strong>for</strong>m). Ratings of carbonation<br />

bite under the two pressure conditions were essentially identical,<br />

indicating that bubbles are not required <strong>for</strong> pungency. In<br />

Experiment 2, we created controlled streams of air bubbles<br />

around the tongue in mildly pungent CO 2<br />

solutions to determine<br />

how tactile stimulation from bubbles affects carbonation bite.<br />

Since innocuous sensations like light touch and cooling often<br />

suppress pain, we predicted that bubbles might reduce rated bite.<br />

Contrary to prediction, air bubbles flowing around the tongue<br />

significantly enhanced rated bite, without inducing perceived<br />

bite in blank (un-carbonated) solutions. Accordingly, though<br />

bubbles are clearly not required <strong>for</strong> carbonation bite, they may<br />

well modulate perceived bite. More generally, the results show<br />

that innocuous tactile stimulation can enhance chemogenic<br />

pain. Possible physiological mechanisms are discussed.<br />

Acknowledgements: Supported in part by Anheuser-Busch InBev<br />

#P125 POSTER SESSION III:<br />

TRIGEMINAL; HUMAN OLFACTORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASTE PERIPHERY<br />

Acid detection by TRPV1 channels in both ‘taste blind’<br />

(P2X-KO) and C57 mice<br />

Meghan L Bills, Jennifer M Strat<strong>for</strong>d, Thomas E Finger<br />

University of Colorado School of Medicine/Department of Cell<br />

and Developmental Biology Aurora, CO, USA<br />

In the oropharynx the low pH of acidic solutions is detected<br />

via taste as sour, and by general mucosal fibers as pungency or<br />

chemesthesis. This results in the behavioral avoidance of acidic<br />

stimuli but the relative contribution of these two systems is<br />

unknown. Genetic deletion of the purinergic receptors P2X2<br />

and P2X3 (P2X-KO) results in interruption of taste bud-tonerve<br />

transmission and consequent loss of taste responses in<br />

the gustatory nerves. Although P2X-KO mice do not respond<br />

behaviorally to most tastants, they continue to avoid acids at<br />

similar concentrations as wildtypes. General mucosal afferents<br />

express TRPV1 channels, which are activated by low pH and<br />

may underlie this avoidance of acids. To test this, P2X-KO<br />

(n=8) and C57 (n=12) mice were assessed using a two-bottle<br />

preference test in which one bottle contained 20 mM citric acid<br />

(CA) and the other water. The test was given in the presence and<br />

absence of the TRPV1 antagonist Iodoresiniferatoxin (I-RTX).<br />

Both strains showed a significant decrease in avoidance with<br />

I-RTX versus vehicle (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!