the PDF version! - Danube Limes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Frontiers of the Roman Empire – Ripa Pannonica in Hungary (RPH) Nomination statement RPH Forum for Reconciliation: • The members of the Forum for Reconciliation representing the Hungarian state are the RPH Management and Development Trust, the National Office of Cultural Heritage, the government commissioner for the Danube Strategy, the county museums with jurisdiction, water conservancy agencies, nature conservation agencies and the management organizations for the individual sites, as well as the town and county governments representing the specific owners of the individual sites. • The main tasks of the Forum for Reconciliation are harmonizing the yearly and medium-term duties, providing expert information, reconciling interests and resolving and settling conflicts in interest. • The Forum for Reconciliation holds an annual meeting at the beginning of the year where the RPH Management and Development Trust reports on the completed work and the planned future tasks to the owners and managers of the individual sites. • Any member of the Forum for Reconciliation may summon the Forum together at a time when it is deemed necessary. 5.e.2 The Management Strategy The management strategy for protection fundamentally structures the future prospects related to the excavated or unexcavated sites of the Ripa from a short, medium and long term perspective. The management/maintenance recommendations are different depending on whether one is considering remains that are visible on the surface, conserved and able to be visited and that can be integrated into a possible international system of limes parks, or those areas where only initial steps have been taken, but in this perspective the known archaeological potential supports realizing the above – at least within the medium term. The situation is also different if we know that the only well-considered goal is the undisturbed preservation of the remains for the foreseeable future. According to the above the following categories have been developed: Category A sites: – Archaeological parks (limes parks) that already exist or can be developed within the short term. Included in this category are those sites that are already protected, excavated, conserved and in some cases pieced together and restored as well as being under constant institutional supervision, and that can be visited and viewed. They need constant scientific supervision, maintenance management, development of visitor-friendly infrastructure and tourism management. Category B sites: – Those sites belong here whose known archaeological finds and conditions make it possible that within the medium term (i.e. 15 years) they can be developed into category A sites. The most important concern for these is establishing the proper level of protection, settling the site’s ownership – expropriations – as well as their excavation or excavation and scientific research, their conservation or restoration and the creation of the institutional and financial framework for the development of infrastructure, as well as the establishment of a conception for their utilization and tourism management. 88
Frontiers of the Roman Empire – Ripa Pannonica in Hungary (RPH) Nomination statement Category C sites: – Those sites belong here, which according to present knowledge or the possibilities contained within its known, but more modest, finds do not make obvious development possible, although scientific and heritage preservation considerations justify their long-term, undisturbed preservation. In these cases, their preservation for the foreseeable future and the halting of known processes that cause deterioration are the major considerations. In the interest of this it is necessary to take measures that are justified concerning its ownership, its registration as protected and possibly its expropriation. An analysis of its usage and any threats to it as well as whether or not there needs to be a change in its maintenance, with particular consideration to the provisions on land use in the valid town development plan, as well as the method of cultivation recorded in the land registry. 89
Page 1:
FRonTiERS oF THE RoMan EMpiRE RIPA
Page 4 and 5:
Frontiers of the Roman Empire - Rip
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43: Frontiers of the Roman Empire - Rip
show all

the PDF version! - Danube Limes

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?