the PDF version! - Danube Limes

Frontiers of the Roman Empire – Ripa Pannonica in Hungary (RPH) Nomination statement
The fact that according to the above table the measures related to the individual sites placed in the particular
categories (A, B and C) are identical indicates that the fundamental management tasks are the same. The
obligations for registration, preservation and the maintenance of conditions are universally valid. The basic
difference is in relation to the high cost excavations, development and exhibition. The role of these categories
is therefore significant primarily in the planning of budgets and the development of programs for action.
The particular individual sites were placed in the categories A, B and C from the standpoint of management.
Management Categories and Highlighted Tasks
RPH
Nr.
Name
Management
Category
Tasks / opportunities
1. Altinum – 1 watch tower B excavation, erosion protection
2. Altinum fort and vicus B change in land use
3. Lugio – 5 watch tower C
4. Lugio / Florentia fort and vicus B prevention of riverbank landslides
5. Contra Florentiam? fortified river port B flood prevention
6. Ad Statuas – 2–3 watch towers and limes road C horticultural exhibit
7. way station B
8. limes road C horticultural exhibit
9. Alisca – 3 watch tower B can be exhibited
10. Alisca fort and vicus B change in land use
11. limes road (A) C horticultural exhibit
12. limes road (B) C horticultural exhibit
13. limes road (C–D) C horticultural exhibit
14. Alta Ripa – 2 watch tower C
15. Alta Ripa – 1 watch tower C
16.
Lussonium – 10 watch tower
B
limes road
C
horticultural exhibit
17.
Lussonium – 9 watch tower and limes road
B
limes road
C
horticultural exhibit
18. Lussonium – 6 watch tower C
19. Lussonium – 12 watch tower C
20. Lussonium – 3 watch tower C
21. limes road C
22. Lussonium fort and vicus A organizing the lots
23. Annamatia – 9 watch tower and limes road C horticultural exhibit
24. Annamatia – 8 watch tower and limes road C
25. Annamatia – 7 watch tower and limes road C
92