20.06.2015 Views

2 - Schneider Electric CZ, s.r.o.

2 - Schneider Electric CZ, s.r.o.

2 - Schneider Electric CZ, s.r.o.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Presentation<br />

Machine safety<br />

Functional Safety of Machinery<br />

Standard EN/IEC 62061<br />

Select the applicable standard<br />

Standard EN/IEC 62061<br />

Machinery safety - Safety-Related <strong>Electric</strong>al Control systems (SRECS)<br />

Process (continued)<br />

> > Types of sub-system architecture<br />

Sub-system element 1<br />

Sub-system type A<br />

Sub-system element n<br />

1<br />

Sub-system element 1<br />

Sub-system element 2<br />

Sub-system type B<br />

Common cause failure<br />

2<br />

Sub-system element 1<br />

Sub-system element n<br />

Diagnostic function(s)<br />

Sub-system type C<br />

Sub-system element 1<br />

Diagnostic function(s)<br />

Sub-system element 2<br />

Sub-system type D<br />

Common cause failure<br />

3<br />

Stage 4 - Select the components for each sub-system<br />

As the safety integrity level required in the example mentioned above is SIL 2, each<br />

of the components must achieve this level.<br />

Once the targeted SIL is determined, the components constructing the system<br />

from safety-related sub-systems (sensor/switch, logic, actuator) have to be<br />

selected. The components must have PFH d<br />

(probability of dangerous failure per<br />

hour) equal to the required SIL rating needed.<br />

Stage 5 - Design the diagnostic function<br />

The SIL of the sub-system depends not only on the components, but also on the<br />

architecture selected.<br />

In EN 62061, a safety integrity requirement is expressed as a target failure value for<br />

the probability of dangerous failure per hour (PFH d<br />

) of each safety related control<br />

function (SRCF).<br />

This can be calculated from reliability data for each component or sub-system, and<br />

is related to the SIL as shown in Table 3 of the standard:<br />

Relationship between SIL and PFH d<br />

values<br />

SIL Probability of dangerous failures per hour (PFH d<br />

)<br />

3 u 10 -8 ... < 10 -7<br />

2 u 10 -7 ... < 10 -6<br />

1 u 10 -6 ... < 10 -5<br />

For each of the four logical architectures A to D presented above, there is a different formula<br />

to calculate the PFH d<br />

. The calculation method is complex and will not be presented here<br />

(please see EN/IEC 62061 for the formula and the parameters taken into account).<br />

Select the applicable standard<br />

In order to be able to select the applicable standard, a common table in both<br />

standards gives indications which are summarised in the table below:<br />

Technology used EN ISO 13849-1<br />

max. PL<br />

EN/IEC 62061<br />

max. SIL<br />

Non electric only, e.g...hydraulic e Not covered<br />

Including some electromechanical, .<br />

e (for designated 3<br />

for example relays and/or non complex electronics architectures only)<br />

Including complex electronics, .<br />

d 3<br />

for example programmable<br />

For building specific complex sub-systems or for higher level requirements<br />

including software, standard EN/IEC 61508 relating to systems must be used.<br />

Relationship between the performance level (PL) and the Safety<br />

Integrity Level (SIL)<br />

PL SIL Probability of dangerous failures per hour 1/h<br />

a No correspondance u 10 -5 … < 10 -4<br />

b 1 u 3 x 10 -6 … < 10 -5<br />

c 1 u 10 -6 … < 3 x 10 -6<br />

d 2 u 10 -7 … < 10 -6<br />

e 3 u 10 -8 … < 10 -7<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Typically for hoisting applications use standard EN ISO 13849-1.<br />

7/13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!