20.06.2015 Views

2 - Schneider Electric CZ, s.r.o.

2 - Schneider Electric CZ, s.r.o.

2 - Schneider Electric CZ, s.r.o.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Presentation<br />

Machine safety<br />

Hoisting applications examples<br />

Example of risk analysis<br />

Logic steps for risk analysis (continued)<br />

(continued)<br />

For our example: a serious injury S2 can be caused by being exposed near the<br />

hoisting machine as if there is no safe guarding to prevent load from falling.<br />

After considering the severity of the injury we investigate the frequency and/or<br />

duration of the possible entry to the dangerous area. Here we define the<br />

frequency of exposure to the hazard is low F1 (occasional presence) as there<br />

are restrictions to enter the area. The last step is based upon the possibility to<br />

avoid the hazard and limiting the harm. To evaluate this we take into<br />

consideration that it is possible to avoid the harm as the visibility around the<br />

dangerous machine is monitored by the operator and in this case there is a<br />

possibility to avoid the harm under certain conditions so we define it as P1.<br />

Starting point for the<br />

evaluation of the<br />

contribution to the risk<br />

reduction of a safety<br />

function<br />

Required<br />

performance<br />

level PLr<br />

S = Severity of injury<br />

S1 = Slight (normally reversible<br />

injury)<br />

S2 = Serious (normally irreversible)<br />

injury including death<br />

F = Frequency and/or exposure<br />

time to the hazard<br />

F1 = Seldom to less often and/<br />

or the exposure time is short<br />

F2 = Frequent to continuous<br />

and/or the exposure time is<br />

long<br />

P = Possibility of avoiding the<br />

hazard or limiting the harm<br />

P1 = Possible under specific<br />

conditions<br />

P2 = Scarcely possible<br />

How to reduce the risk?<br />

3 possibilities:<br />

1: Measure design<br />

> > Follow FEM rules<br />

> > Follow the rules EN 60204-32<br />

> > Downgrade of the nominal capacity of the machine<br />

2: Staff information<br />

> > User guide<br />

> > Appropriate licence for driving machine<br />

> > Prevent presence of staff around machine<br />

3: Specific safeguarding functions for prevention and risk reduction:<br />

Safeguarding functions for prevention and risk reduction<br />

Concerning machine exceeding 1000 Kg:<br />

> > Device for checking the class of use and load spectrum in order to check<br />

the stresses of the bridge and its compliance with FEM design and<br />

facilitate the scheduling of maintenance operations<br />

> > Device to limit the improper crane operation<br />

> > Lighting and/or embedded signalling to illuminate the area of development<br />

and signal the approach of the bridge<br />

> > Collision avoidance device for moving bridges on the same runway<br />

> > Collision avoidance device when several bridges operate in superposition<br />

> > Management system interference when multiple bridges are involved in<br />

moving a single load, or when they overlook other lifting devices<br />

> > Limiting the working area of the bridge to prevent it from carrying loads<br />

over areas with people<br />

> > Protective barrier or safety switches to ensure that the gantry crane will<br />

not collide with people or objects<br />

> > Depending on the conditions of use and the type of load, an emergency<br />

brake is used acting on the drum with separate overspeed sensor, in the<br />

case the service brake fails<br />

> > Ensure area where the crane is operating is clear from obstructions and<br />

completely visible<br />

> > When the speed exceeds 30 m / min in trolley or 40 m / min in translation,<br />

use speed drives or soft starters to obtain progressive starting and<br />

stopping of the horizontal movements<br />

> > Use limit switches on all movements and a rope end limit switch<br />

> > A load capacity limiter<br />

> > Written procedure to prioritize actions when previous solutions have not<br />

been technically implemented or are not appropriate<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

7/21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!