this trial was to evaluate the effect of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g levels of CGM (up to 18%) <strong>on</strong> growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>pigment depositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> fillets from ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>bow trout.4.2 Materials <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods4.2.1 Fish husb<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> experimental c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sThis study was c<strong>on</strong>ducted at the Alma Aquaculture Research Stati<strong>on</strong> (AARS, Alma, ON,Canada). Domestic stra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> of ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>bow trout, (O. mykiss) from the AARS’s stock populati<strong>on</strong> wereadapted to experimental c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for two weeks prior to start the experiment. Dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g thatperiod, fish were fed a commercial (with no pigment supplementati<strong>on</strong>) trout diet (Mart<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> MillsInc, Elora, ON, Canada) <strong>on</strong>ce a day.The 7 experimental diets were r<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>omly assigned to each of 21 (1,500 L) fibreglass tanks(n=3). Seventy five fish (549 g fish -1 , <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itial body weight) were r<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>omly allocated <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to eachtank <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> kept under a 12 h light: 12 h dark photoperiod regime. Filtered well water was suppliedapproximately at a 30.5 L m<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> -1 rate. Water temperature was kept at 8.5 °C. This experiment wasc<strong>on</strong>ducted accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g with the guidel<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>es stated by the Canadian Council <strong>on</strong> Animal Care(CCAC, 1984) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the University of Guelph Animal Care Committee.Fish were h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>-fed twice a week to near satiati<strong>on</strong> dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 24 weeks. Dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gfive days, fish were fed us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g belt feeders. Daily rati<strong>on</strong> to be dispensed by belt feeders wasdeterm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed by averag<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the amount of feed given to that tank dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the previous two dailyh<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> feed<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs.Five fish were sampled at the beg<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>n<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of the experiment for the determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itialcarcass compositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> another sample of five fish was used for <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itial muscle pigment c<strong>on</strong>tent<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> colour determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong>. At the end of the experimental period, four <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ten fish from each tank77
were r<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>omly sampled for f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>al carcass compositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>al muscle pigment c<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>colour determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong>, respectively. Fish were sacrificed by an overdose of MS-222 (300 ppm L -1 ). Fish for carcass compositi<strong>on</strong> determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> were autoclaved, thoroughly ground <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to a slurry,freeze-dried, ground <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to a f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e powder <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> kept at -20 °C until analysis. Fish to be analysed formuscle pigment c<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> colour determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> were manually sk<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ned <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> right h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sidefilleted right after slaughter; after muscle colour determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> muscle samples were stored at -20 °C until pigments determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> analysis.4.2.2 Experimental dietsSix (6) extruded experimental diets were formulated to be is<strong>on</strong>itrogenous (48 % crudeprote<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> isoenergetic (20 MJ DE/kg) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> to c<strong>on</strong>ta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> different <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gredient comb<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong>s (i.e.fish meal, soy prote<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrate, feather meal, blood meal, wheat meal, soybean meal <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> fishoil) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> either no CGM (Diet 1), 4% CGM (Diet 2), 9% CGM (Diet 3), 12% CGM (Diet 4), 14%CGM (Diet 5) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 18% CGM (Diet 6), <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> meet all the nutriti<strong>on</strong>al requirements for ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>bowtrout based <strong>on</strong> NRC (2011) (Table 4.1). A commercial feed c<strong>on</strong>ta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 10% CGM (Diet 7) wasused. All diets were supplemented with 50 mg kg -1 astaxanth<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> (Carophyll® p<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>k, 8%astaxanth<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>, DSM Nutriti<strong>on</strong>al Products, ON, Canada).Noteworthy is that <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clusi<strong>on</strong> of graded levels of CGM <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Diet 1, 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 6 (0, 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 18%CGM, respectively) was achieved at expense of soy prote<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrate <strong>on</strong>ly (Table 4.1).C<strong>on</strong>versely, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the formulati<strong>on</strong> for Diets 2, 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5 (4, 12 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 14% CGM, respectively), <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clusi<strong>on</strong>of several <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gredients (i.e. fish meal, feather meal, blood meal, wheat meal <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> fish oil) wasmodified <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> order to accomplish desired CGM <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clusi<strong>on</strong> levels.78
- Page 1 and 2:
Pigment Re
- Page 3 and 4:
ingredients. Furth
- Page 5 and 6:
Thanks to all my colleagues, friend
- Page 7 and 8:
2.10.1 Enzymatic treatments .......
- Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF TABLESTable 3. 1 - Factors
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURESFigure 2. 1 - Molecu
- Page 13 and 14:
Ingredients commonly in</st
- Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER - 2 LITERATURE REVIEW2.1 In
- Page 17 and 18:
leached when 5% of soy flour as LOX
- Page 19 and 20:
deep and fast glyc
- Page 21 and 22:
observed in ra<str
- Page 23 and 24:
Chylomicron constituents are remove
- Page 25 and 26:
Muscle growth in r
- Page 27 and 28:
2.7.2 Corn gluten
- Page 29 and 30:
2010). However, due to its imbalanc
- Page 31 and 32:
No differences in
- Page 33 and 34:
supplemented with 42% of a vegetabl
- Page 35 and 36:
Soybean seeds are the richest known
- Page 37 and 38: 2.10.1.4 Bleaching
- Page 39 and 40: 2.11 ConclusionInclusion of <strong
- Page 41 and 42: 4.0%*68%* 5.6%* 12%* 3.5%* 6.5%*Fig
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 2. 4 - Schematic representat
- Page 45 and 46: 3.1 IntroductionThe characteristic
- Page 47 and 48: many factors such as LOX source lev
- Page 49 and 50: During the 12-week
- Page 51 and 52: 3.2.3 Analytical methodsDry matter
- Page 53 and 54: solution was generated by mix<stron
- Page 55 and 56: 3.2.4 Statistical analysisData from
- Page 57 and 58: Factors defined as
- Page 59 and 60: chromatography). Relative amounts o
- Page 61 and 62: After carotenoids are absorbed thro
- Page 63 and 64: and ended up <stro
- Page 65 and 66: Table 3. 2 - Experimental design us
- Page 67 and 68: Table 3. 4 - Analysed proximate com
- Page 69 and 70: Proximate composition (Analysed; dr
- Page 71 and 72: Table 3. 7 - Lipoxygenase activity
- Page 73 and 74: 18 1 0 -1 0 120 15 0 10 2519 -1 0 1
- Page 75 and 76: Table 3. 10 - HPLC carotenoid profi
- Page 77 and 78: Table 3. 12 - Retain</stron
- Page 79 and 80: Table 3. 14 - Fillet carotenoid con
- Page 81 and 82: Total yellow pigment(mg•kg -1 )25
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 3. 4 - Growth curve of ra<st
- Page 85 and 86: effects of dietary CGM and<
- Page 87: soybean meal in a
- Page 91 and 92: An aliquot (1 ml) of chloroform low
- Page 93 and 94: Retained nitrogen
- Page 95 and 96: significant (p
- Page 97 and 98: Values for all-trans astaxanth<stro
- Page 99 and 100: previous reports where colour attri
- Page 101 and 102: Proximate composition (analysed), d
- Page 103 and 104: Table 4. 2 - Growth performance of
- Page 105 and 106: Table 4. 3 - Carcass chemical proxi
- Page 107 and 108: Table 4. 4 - Retain</strong
- Page 109 and 110: Table 4. 5 - Pigment</stron
- Page 111 and 112: Table 4. 6 - Colour attributes <str
- Page 113 and 114: FiguresFigure 4. 1 - Growth curves
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 4. 3 - Muscle colour attribu
- Page 117 and 118: the effects of dietary reduced-caro
- Page 119 and 120: astaxanthin deposi
- Page 121 and 122: After steeping, ke
- Page 123 and 124: 0.9994 and 0.9999,
- Page 125 and 126: under acidic and a
- Page 127 and 128: oxidation within t
- Page 129 and 130: colour difference usin</str
- Page 131 and 132: TablesTable 5. 1 - Analyzed proxima
- Page 133 and 134: Effects of
- Page 135 and 136: Effects of
- Page 137 and 138: Effects of
- Page 139 and 140:
Effects of
- Page 141 and 142:
Data are mean (n=2).a Steepwater pH
- Page 143 and 144:
CHAPTER - 6 GENERAL DISCUSSIONCurre
- Page 145 and 146:
significant reduction in</s
- Page 147 and 148:
Reduction of pigme
- Page 149 and 150:
though wheat gluten meal conta<stro
- Page 151 and 152:
BibliographyAas, G.H., Storebakken,
- Page 153 and 154:
Bjerkeng, B., Hatlen, B., Wathne, E
- Page 155 and 156:
Choubert, G., Cravedi, J., Laurenti
- Page 157 and 158:
Fauconneau, B., Andre, S., Chmaitil
- Page 159 and 160:
Johnston, I., Li, X., Vieira, V., N
- Page 161 and 162:
Li, M.H., Oberle, D.F., Lucas, P.M.
- Page 163 and 164:
Peter, C.M., Han, Y., Bolin
- Page 165 and 166:
Skonberg, D.I., Hardy, R.W., Barrow
- Page 167:
Ytrestoyl, T., Struksnæs, G., Kopp