first, Shep's Island (Table 51, adjacentto Upper Myakka Lake, consists <strong>of</strong>cabbage palm and live oak and has I lr;-tle shrub and ground Vegetation. <strong>The</strong>second hammock, located about 20 km tothe east in Deer Prairie Slough, containsa number <strong>of</strong> hardwoods absentfrom Shep's Island, as well as copiousshrubs and herbs. <strong>The</strong> hydric hanlmockin Deer Prairie Slough occupies aslightly elevated area that is completelysurrounded b~ mi xed hardwoodswamp. We suggest that this contrastin hammock vegetation i s due to d ii i F-ference in fire frequency and intensity.Presumably fires that sweep thevast marshes <strong>of</strong> the Myakka region alsoburn Shep's Island but are damped bythe swamp in Deer Prairie Slough andonly rarely reach the hammock there.It also is possible that the hydrologicalconditions <strong>of</strong> the two hammocksdiffer enough to account for some <strong>of</strong>the differences in species composi -tion. <strong>The</strong> swamp may modulate theflooding regime <strong>of</strong> the Deer PrairieSiough ild111111u~k i u ~ h t h ~ th: dcr:t'c::<strong>of</strong> flooding is less than in the Shep'sIsland hammock and drydowns are not assevere.<strong>The</strong> plant composition <strong>of</strong> the Tosohatcheehydric hammock (upper St.Johns River) varies greatly on a localscale (Figure 36). Portions <strong>of</strong> thehammock jmmedi ately adjaceqt to freshwatermarsh (Figure 36c, d) are theleast diverse. Fire scars are pervasive,signal 1 i ng more frequent burnsin these sites than in hammock portionsnext to a mixed hardwood swamp(Figure 36b) and a creek (Figure 36a).<strong>The</strong> low basal area <strong>of</strong> forest (d) andits short stature (the average height<strong>of</strong> the canopy is 12 m, in contrast to17 m in site (b)) probably are due to80 - cabbage'760-40I-Iswdmpoak 01QnUt Floridasouthernred- sweet--cedar gum redw r-7 r 1 ?kor~ 25 I I 1 ] mulberrycabbagered -ZE!%sugar- I/ / 1 livewaxmyrtleFigure 36. Species comf30sition Of nearby Portions <strong>of</strong> a hydric-hammock stand in the northernpart <strong>of</strong> Tosohatchee State preserves Orange Total basal area is listed for each site.
frequent fires, a1 though timber harvesting(evident from stumps <strong>of</strong> southernred-cedar) also may be signifi -cant. It is likely that sites (a) and(b) are more diverse not only because<strong>of</strong> less frequent fire, but because <strong>of</strong>less extreme hydrological regimes--their soils probably are kept moreconstantly saturated. <strong>The</strong> low diversityat sites (c) and (d) may also result,in part, from higher salt concentrationsthat exclude sal t-intolerantspecies.<strong>The</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> hydri c hammocks,as well as their species composition,may be affected by fire. When fire issuppressed in an adjoining communi ty,<strong>of</strong>ten by human actions, hydric hammockmay expand. In the Alafia River system<strong>of</strong> west-central Florida, Clewel 1et al. (1982) documented the movement<strong>of</strong> wetland hardwoods (live oak, swamplaurel oak, water oak, and sweetgum)into pine flatwoods. <strong>The</strong>y attributedthe extension to a reduction in firefrequency brought about by agri culturalactivities in the uplands.Though the expansion <strong>of</strong> hydric hammockinto freshwater marsh in Myakka RiverState Park is related partly tochanges in the hydro1 ogi cal regime(see section 3.32), fire suppressionalso may be responsible. Fire suppressionwithin the park has accompaniedincreased recreational use; frequencyalso has decreased in the watersheddue to land-use changes.3.3.5 Other Disturbances<strong>Hydric</strong> hammocks have a long history<strong>of</strong> human use and disturbance that ischronicled in the accompanying managementhandbook (Simons et a7. 1989).Probably few areas have remained untouchedby human activities. Timberharvesting and 1 ivestock grazing probablyhave had the greatest influenceon the plant composition <strong>of</strong> contemporaryhydric hammocks.Logging <strong>of</strong> hydric-hammock forestshas greatly varied in intensity andscale, from selective cuts <strong>of</strong> scatteredindividual s to clearcutting <strong>of</strong>hundreds <strong>of</strong> acres. Until the twentiethcentury, the cuts generally wereselective; the chosen species changedwith m2rket dz~:c?. I, :.,-highly valued in the era <strong>of</strong> woodenships, especially in the early andmid-1800's when the United Statesbuilt its navy. Pencil production inthe late 1800's was dominated bysouthern red-cedar, resul ti nq in theover-exploitation <strong>of</strong> this species inGulf Hammock. <strong>The</strong> large stumps thathave endured in the hydric hammocksshow that regenerated southern redcedarshave no+ yet reached their f:rmer size. In the 1800's and 1900's,sweetgum and some other hardwoods <strong>of</strong>hydric hammocks were cut selectivelyfor manufacture <strong>of</strong> furniture andcrates, and these harvests too aremanifested in present size distri butions.Sweetgum trees between 50 and75 cm dbh are common in the TigerCreek hydri c hammock, 1 ong protectedfrom harvesting, and in remote areas<strong>of</strong> the gulf coastal hammocks, butelsewhere the trees are rarely greaterthan 50 cm dbh. Where past harvestingis particularly evident, for examplein the Orange Lake palm/oak hammock(Tab1 e 5), sweetgirms are less than 25cm dbh. Highgrading, the practice <strong>of</strong>harvesting all merchantable treeswhile leaving species and individualtrees <strong>of</strong> low value, became popular inthe twentieth century. This type <strong>of</strong>1 oggi ng in hydri c hammocks general 1 yretains all cabbage palm, live oak,and an assortment <strong>of</strong> crooked and decayedtrees. <strong>The</strong> dominance <strong>of</strong> cabbagepalm and live oak in some hydric hammocks,for example the Orange Lakeforest, must in part be due to highgradingand selective harvesting practicesthat bypassed these species.Clearcutting became the predominantmode <strong>of</strong> harvest in hydric hammock inthe past 20 years. Sometimes thecl earcuts are a1 1 owed to regeneratenaturally, but more <strong>of</strong>ten, and particularly in the gulf coastal hammocks,they are planted with loblolly pine.uc; ;ak ~;l;Spanish explorers brought cattle andhogs to Florida in the sixteenth century,and wild hogs have roamed hydrichammocks and many other habitats eversince. Cattle still are grazed insome hydric hammocks where ground vegetationis relatively lush, such asthe inland reaches <strong>of</strong> the gulf coastal
- Page 2 and 3:
Copies of this publication may be o
- Page 4 and 5:
DISCLAIMERThe opinions and recommen
- Page 6 and 7: CONVERSION TABLEMetric to U.S. Cust
- Page 8 and 9: FIGURESNumber1AL...............Dist
- Page 10 and 11: NumberTABLESPaqeClassifications of
- Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION"Hammock, ho
- Page 15 and 16: whereas hydric hammock is a still-w
- Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 2. PHYSICAL SElTiNG2.3 CLIM
- Page 19 and 20: Recent and PIe~sIoLene sands clay m
- Page 21 and 22: ern vegetation associations formed-
- Page 23 and 24: Table 3. Comparison of surface soil
- Page 25 and 26: throughout the year in Florida, and
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 13. Flooding and drydown of
- Page 29 and 30: +southari:magnolla+-------cabbage p
- Page 31 and 32: frequency may be once per year in f
- Page 33 and 34: Table 4. Plants occurring in hydric
- Page 35 and 36: Table 4. (Continued).Scientific nam
- Page 37 and 38: of the subcanopy and shrub layers i
- Page 39 and 40: sites were not chosen randomly;rath
- Page 41 and 42: When present in a hydric hammock,ca
- Page 43 and 44: hydric harriniock forests. These sp
- Page 45 and 46: was the most frequent shrub in the
- Page 47 and 48: Gulf Hammock is rep1 aced abruptly
- Page 49 and 50: A sequence of changes in plantmat a
- Page 51 and 52: I ~ U mapleswamp laurel oak 3:1100b
- Page 53 and 54: The salt concentration of hydricham
- Page 55: Cabbage palm is the most fire-toler
- Page 59: Figure 38. Tree blowdowns due to hu
- Page 62 and 63: locally collected litter lost 85% o
- Page 64 and 65: Table 7. Occurrence of reptiles and
- Page 66 and 67: Table 8. Occurrence of reptiles and
- Page 68 and 69: 4.3 BIRDS4.3.1 Community StructureM
- Page 70 and 71: Table 11. (Concluded).- ----Variabl
- Page 72 and 73: and cerambyci d beet1 es) . Unl i k
- Page 74 and 75: no specific habitat preference; it
- Page 76 and 77: not take place in years of mast fai
- Page 78 and 79: Graves 1977). These observations su
- Page 80 and 81: Consumption of fleshy fruits by res
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 6. LINKAGES WITH OTHER ECOS
- Page 84: R Amerlcan swallow-tailed kite b. t
- Page 87: Conner, W.H., and J.W. Day, Jr. 197
- Page 90 and 91: Duck foods in managed tidalimpoundm
- Page 92 and 93: Puri, M,S., 3.W, Yon, and W.R.Ogles
- Page 94 and 95: Wharton, C.H. 1977. The naturalenvi