26.11.2012 Views

Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever

Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever

Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Basis of report<strong>in</strong>g and discussion<br />

Our account<strong>in</strong>g policies are based on United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

generally accepted account<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples (GAAP) and UK and<br />

Netherlands law which differ <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> respects from United<br />

States GAAP. The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal differences are described on<br />

page 119. We have shown reconciliations to net <strong>in</strong>come and<br />

capital and reserves under US GAAP on pages 118 and 119.<br />

The commentary throughout this operat<strong>in</strong>g review is,<br />

unless otherwise <strong>in</strong>dicated, based on the results of the<br />

Group <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g acquisitions made each year, at constant<br />

rates of exchange (see below) and before exceptional<br />

items and amortisation of goodwill and <strong>in</strong>tangibles (BEIA).<br />

In our report<strong>in</strong>g, turnover means Group turnover plus our<br />

share of turnover of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures, net of our share of any<br />

sales to the jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures already <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Group<br />

figures. Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit means Group operat<strong>in</strong>g profit plus<br />

our share of operat<strong>in</strong>g profit of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures. These<br />

measures do not <strong>in</strong>clude our share of the turnover or<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g profit of associates. References to sales growth<br />

are made on an underly<strong>in</strong>g basis, exclud<strong>in</strong>g the effects of<br />

acquisitions and disposals. References to turnover growth<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude the effects of acquisitions and disposals.<br />

<strong>Report</strong><strong>in</strong>g currency and exchange rates<br />

Foreign currency amounts for results and cash flows are<br />

translated from underly<strong>in</strong>g local currencies <strong>in</strong>to euros<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g annual average exchange rates; balance sheet<br />

amounts are translated at year-end rates except for the<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary capital of the two parent companies. These are<br />

translated at the rate prescribed by the Equalisation<br />

Agreement of £1 = Fl. 12, and thence to euros at the<br />

official rate of €1.00 = Fl. 2.20371 (see Control of<br />

<strong>Unilever</strong> on page 138).<br />

The discussion of performance <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

review is based on constant rates of exchange. This removes<br />

the distort<strong>in</strong>g impact of currency movements and more<br />

clearly portrays the underly<strong>in</strong>g progress of the operations<br />

themselves. The rate used is the annual average rate for the<br />

prior year. For each two-year period, the year-on-year trends<br />

<strong>in</strong> euros are the same as those which would arise if the<br />

results were shown <strong>in</strong> sterl<strong>in</strong>g or US dollars at constant<br />

exchange rates.<br />

For the report<strong>in</strong>g of 2000 at current exchange rates, the<br />

results of the Bestfoods bus<strong>in</strong>ess acquired on 4 October of<br />

that year were translated at the average rates of exchange<br />

for the last quarter of 2000. In the constant rate comparisons<br />

for 2001 <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Operat<strong>in</strong>g review on pages 18<br />

to 34, the results for all parts of the Group have been<br />

translated at average rates of exchange for the <strong>full</strong> year to<br />

31 December 2000. This means that the 2000 results <strong>in</strong><br />

these comparative tables will differ <strong>in</strong> some cases from the<br />

values translated at current rates of exchange.<br />

Details of exchange rates used <strong>in</strong> preparation of these<br />

<strong>accounts</strong> and of the Noon Buy<strong>in</strong>g Rates aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

US dollar are given on page 117.<br />

<strong>Unilever</strong> Annual <strong>Report</strong> & Accounts and Form 20-F <strong>2002</strong><br />

Operat<strong>in</strong>g review – highlights 15<br />

<strong>2002</strong> results compared with 2001<br />

Includ<strong>in</strong>g the impact of acquisitions and disposals, turnover<br />

for the year of €52 020 million was <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with 2001 levels.<br />

Exclud<strong>in</strong>g the effect of acquisitions and disposals, underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

growth was 4.2%. The net effect of acquisition and disposal<br />

activity was a reduction of 4.4%.<br />

Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit BEIA <strong>in</strong>creased by 6.5% to €7 739 million<br />

and operat<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> BEIA moved ahead to 14.9% from<br />

13.9% <strong>in</strong> 2001. The improvement <strong>in</strong> marg<strong>in</strong> is primarily due<br />

to bus<strong>in</strong>ess restructur<strong>in</strong>g and procurement sav<strong>in</strong>gs under the<br />

Path to Growth strategy comb<strong>in</strong>ed with cont<strong>in</strong>ued success<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegration of Bestfoods, partially offset by higher<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g and promotions expenditure.<br />

Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit <strong>in</strong>creased by 3.4% to €5 436 million.<br />

This <strong>in</strong>cludes a higher net charge for exceptional items<br />

than the prior year, which <strong>in</strong>cluded higher profits on the<br />

sale of brands.<br />

Exceptional items<br />

Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit for the year <strong>in</strong>cludes net exceptional<br />

charges of €939 million, an <strong>in</strong>crease of 59.7% on 2001.<br />

Restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment was €1 298 million, which was<br />

offset by the release of provisions follow<strong>in</strong>g settlement of<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> legal claims <strong>in</strong> our favour and profits on disposals<br />

totall<strong>in</strong>g €359 million.<br />

The exceptional items <strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> the year primarily<br />

relate to the Path to Growth strategy we announced<br />

on 22 February 2000 to accelerate growth and expand<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>s, and to restructur<strong>in</strong>g aris<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

of Bestfoods. The aggregate cost of these programmes over<br />

5 years is estimated to be €6.2 billion, the majority of<br />

which is expected to be exceptional. An €828 million<br />

profit recognised <strong>in</strong> 2001 on the sale of brands to secure<br />

regulatory approval for the acquisition of Bestfoods is not<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this estimate.<br />

Details of movements <strong>in</strong> restructur<strong>in</strong>g and other provisions<br />

are given <strong>in</strong> note 19 on page 95.<br />

Under US GAAP, some of the restructur<strong>in</strong>g charges <strong>in</strong> each<br />

year would not have been recognised until certa<strong>in</strong> additional<br />

criteria had been met, and would then have been <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

as a charge <strong>in</strong> subsequent years. Details of the US GAAP<br />

adjustments relat<strong>in</strong>g to the restructur<strong>in</strong>g charges are given<br />

on pages 118 to 120.<br />

Amortisation of goodwill and <strong>in</strong>tangibles<br />

The amortisation charge for the year was €1 364 million,<br />

a decrease of 4.1% on 2001. <strong>2002</strong> <strong>in</strong>cludes €1 110 million<br />

(2001: €1 170 million) <strong>in</strong> respect of goodwill recognised on<br />

the acquisition of Bestfoods.<br />

Under US GAAP, there is no amortisation charge with effect<br />

from 1 January <strong>2002</strong> for goodwill or for <strong>in</strong>tangible assets<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite lives. Further details are given on pages<br />

118 to 120.<br />

<strong>Report</strong> of the Directors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!