Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever
Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever
Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Basis of report<strong>in</strong>g and discussion<br />
Our account<strong>in</strong>g policies are based on United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />
generally accepted account<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples (GAAP) and UK and<br />
Netherlands law which differ <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> respects from United<br />
States GAAP. The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal differences are described on<br />
page 119. We have shown reconciliations to net <strong>in</strong>come and<br />
capital and reserves under US GAAP on pages 118 and 119.<br />
The commentary throughout this operat<strong>in</strong>g review is,<br />
unless otherwise <strong>in</strong>dicated, based on the results of the<br />
Group <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g acquisitions made each year, at constant<br />
rates of exchange (see below) and before exceptional<br />
items and amortisation of goodwill and <strong>in</strong>tangibles (BEIA).<br />
In our report<strong>in</strong>g, turnover means Group turnover plus our<br />
share of turnover of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures, net of our share of any<br />
sales to the jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures already <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Group<br />
figures. Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit means Group operat<strong>in</strong>g profit plus<br />
our share of operat<strong>in</strong>g profit of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures. These<br />
measures do not <strong>in</strong>clude our share of the turnover or<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g profit of associates. References to sales growth<br />
are made on an underly<strong>in</strong>g basis, exclud<strong>in</strong>g the effects of<br />
acquisitions and disposals. References to turnover growth<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude the effects of acquisitions and disposals.<br />
<strong>Report</strong><strong>in</strong>g currency and exchange rates<br />
Foreign currency amounts for results and cash flows are<br />
translated from underly<strong>in</strong>g local currencies <strong>in</strong>to euros<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g annual average exchange rates; balance sheet<br />
amounts are translated at year-end rates except for the<br />
ord<strong>in</strong>ary capital of the two parent companies. These are<br />
translated at the rate prescribed by the Equalisation<br />
Agreement of £1 = Fl. 12, and thence to euros at the<br />
official rate of €1.00 = Fl. 2.20371 (see Control of<br />
<strong>Unilever</strong> on page 138).<br />
The discussion of performance <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
review is based on constant rates of exchange. This removes<br />
the distort<strong>in</strong>g impact of currency movements and more<br />
clearly portrays the underly<strong>in</strong>g progress of the operations<br />
themselves. The rate used is the annual average rate for the<br />
prior year. For each two-year period, the year-on-year trends<br />
<strong>in</strong> euros are the same as those which would arise if the<br />
results were shown <strong>in</strong> sterl<strong>in</strong>g or US dollars at constant<br />
exchange rates.<br />
For the report<strong>in</strong>g of 2000 at current exchange rates, the<br />
results of the Bestfoods bus<strong>in</strong>ess acquired on 4 October of<br />
that year were translated at the average rates of exchange<br />
for the last quarter of 2000. In the constant rate comparisons<br />
for 2001 <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Operat<strong>in</strong>g review on pages 18<br />
to 34, the results for all parts of the Group have been<br />
translated at average rates of exchange for the <strong>full</strong> year to<br />
31 December 2000. This means that the 2000 results <strong>in</strong><br />
these comparative tables will differ <strong>in</strong> some cases from the<br />
values translated at current rates of exchange.<br />
Details of exchange rates used <strong>in</strong> preparation of these<br />
<strong>accounts</strong> and of the Noon Buy<strong>in</strong>g Rates aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />
US dollar are given on page 117.<br />
<strong>Unilever</strong> Annual <strong>Report</strong> & Accounts and Form 20-F <strong>2002</strong><br />
Operat<strong>in</strong>g review – highlights 15<br />
<strong>2002</strong> results compared with 2001<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g the impact of acquisitions and disposals, turnover<br />
for the year of €52 020 million was <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with 2001 levels.<br />
Exclud<strong>in</strong>g the effect of acquisitions and disposals, underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />
growth was 4.2%. The net effect of acquisition and disposal<br />
activity was a reduction of 4.4%.<br />
Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit BEIA <strong>in</strong>creased by 6.5% to €7 739 million<br />
and operat<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> BEIA moved ahead to 14.9% from<br />
13.9% <strong>in</strong> 2001. The improvement <strong>in</strong> marg<strong>in</strong> is primarily due<br />
to bus<strong>in</strong>ess restructur<strong>in</strong>g and procurement sav<strong>in</strong>gs under the<br />
Path to Growth strategy comb<strong>in</strong>ed with cont<strong>in</strong>ued success<br />
<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegration of Bestfoods, partially offset by higher<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g and promotions expenditure.<br />
Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit <strong>in</strong>creased by 3.4% to €5 436 million.<br />
This <strong>in</strong>cludes a higher net charge for exceptional items<br />
than the prior year, which <strong>in</strong>cluded higher profits on the<br />
sale of brands.<br />
Exceptional items<br />
Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit for the year <strong>in</strong>cludes net exceptional<br />
charges of €939 million, an <strong>in</strong>crease of 59.7% on 2001.<br />
Restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment was €1 298 million, which was<br />
offset by the release of provisions follow<strong>in</strong>g settlement of<br />
certa<strong>in</strong> legal claims <strong>in</strong> our favour and profits on disposals<br />
totall<strong>in</strong>g €359 million.<br />
The exceptional items <strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> the year primarily<br />
relate to the Path to Growth strategy we announced<br />
on 22 February 2000 to accelerate growth and expand<br />
marg<strong>in</strong>s, and to restructur<strong>in</strong>g aris<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
of Bestfoods. The aggregate cost of these programmes over<br />
5 years is estimated to be €6.2 billion, the majority of<br />
which is expected to be exceptional. An €828 million<br />
profit recognised <strong>in</strong> 2001 on the sale of brands to secure<br />
regulatory approval for the acquisition of Bestfoods is not<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this estimate.<br />
Details of movements <strong>in</strong> restructur<strong>in</strong>g and other provisions<br />
are given <strong>in</strong> note 19 on page 95.<br />
Under US GAAP, some of the restructur<strong>in</strong>g charges <strong>in</strong> each<br />
year would not have been recognised until certa<strong>in</strong> additional<br />
criteria had been met, and would then have been <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
as a charge <strong>in</strong> subsequent years. Details of the US GAAP<br />
adjustments relat<strong>in</strong>g to the restructur<strong>in</strong>g charges are given<br />
on pages 118 to 120.<br />
Amortisation of goodwill and <strong>in</strong>tangibles<br />
The amortisation charge for the year was €1 364 million,<br />
a decrease of 4.1% on 2001. <strong>2002</strong> <strong>in</strong>cludes €1 110 million<br />
(2001: €1 170 million) <strong>in</strong> respect of goodwill recognised on<br />
the acquisition of Bestfoods.<br />
Under US GAAP, there is no amortisation charge with effect<br />
from 1 January <strong>2002</strong> for goodwill or for <strong>in</strong>tangible assets<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite lives. Further details are given on pages<br />
118 to 120.<br />
<strong>Report</strong> of the Directors