Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever
Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever
Report & accounts 2002 in full - Unilever
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Report</strong> of the auditors to the members<br />
of <strong>Unilever</strong> N.V. and <strong>Unilever</strong> PLC<br />
We have audited the <strong>accounts</strong>, which have been prepared<br />
under the historical cost convention, set out on page 66 to<br />
112, 118 to 133 and 135 to 136. We have also audited the<br />
auditable part of the directors’ remuneration report as set<br />
out on page 60.<br />
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors<br />
As described on pages 63 and 64, the directors are<br />
responsible for prepar<strong>in</strong>g the Annual <strong>Report</strong> & Accounts<br />
and Form 20-F. This <strong>in</strong>cludes responsibility for prepar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>in</strong> accordance with applicable account<strong>in</strong>g<br />
standards. Our responsibility is to audit the <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
accordance with applicable law, audit<strong>in</strong>g standards and<br />
list<strong>in</strong>g rules <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands and United K<strong>in</strong>gdom.<br />
We report to you our op<strong>in</strong>ion as to whether the <strong>accounts</strong><br />
give a true and fair view and are properly prepared <strong>in</strong><br />
accordance with Title 9, Book 2 of the Civil Code <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Netherlands and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom Companies Act 1985.<br />
We also report whether the auditable part of the directors’<br />
remuneration report is properly prepared <strong>in</strong> accordance with<br />
the applicable requirements <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands and the<br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. We would also report to you if, <strong>in</strong> our<br />
op<strong>in</strong>ion, the directors’ report was not consistent with the<br />
<strong>accounts</strong>, if proper account<strong>in</strong>g records had not been kept,<br />
if we had not received all the <strong>in</strong>formation and explanations<br />
we require for our audit, or if <strong>in</strong>formation required regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
directors’ remuneration and transactions were not disclosed.<br />
We read the other <strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Annual <strong>Report</strong> & Accounts and Form 20-F and consider<br />
the implications for our audit report if we become aware<br />
of any material misstatements or <strong>in</strong>consistencies with<br />
the <strong>accounts</strong>.<br />
As auditors of <strong>Unilever</strong> PLC we review whether the<br />
statement on pages 44 and 45 reflects the Company’s<br />
compliance with the seven provisions of the Comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
Code specified for our review by the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom’s<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services Authority and we report if it does not.<br />
We are not required to consider whether the directors’<br />
statements on <strong>in</strong>ternal control cover all risks and controls<br />
or to form an op<strong>in</strong>ion on the effectiveness of the Group’s<br />
corporate governance procedures or its risk and control<br />
procedures.<br />
Basis of op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />
We conducted our audit <strong>in</strong> accordance with audit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
standards generally accepted <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands, the<br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom and the United States. An audit <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
an exam<strong>in</strong>ation, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the<br />
amounts and disclosures <strong>in</strong> the <strong>accounts</strong> and the auditable<br />
part of the directors’ remuneration report. It also <strong>in</strong>cludes an<br />
assessment of the most important estimates and judgements<br />
made by the directors <strong>in</strong> the preparation of the <strong>accounts</strong>,<br />
and of whether the account<strong>in</strong>g policies are appropriate to<br />
the Group’s circumstances, consistently applied and<br />
adequately disclosed.<br />
<strong>Unilever</strong> Annual <strong>Report</strong> & Accounts and Form 20-F <strong>2002</strong><br />
<strong>Report</strong> of <strong>in</strong>dependent auditors 65<br />
We planned and performed our audit so as to obta<strong>in</strong> all<br />
the <strong>in</strong>formation and explanations which we considered<br />
necessary <strong>in</strong> order to provide us with sufficient evidence<br />
to give reasonable assurance that the <strong>accounts</strong> and the<br />
auditable part of the directors’ remuneration report are free<br />
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or<br />
other irregularity or error. In form<strong>in</strong>g our op<strong>in</strong>ion we also<br />
evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation<br />
of <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>accounts</strong>.<br />
Netherlands and United K<strong>in</strong>gdom op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />
In our op<strong>in</strong>ion, the <strong>accounts</strong> give a true and fair view of<br />
the state of affairs of the <strong>Unilever</strong> Group, <strong>Unilever</strong> N.V. and<br />
<strong>Unilever</strong> PLC at 31 December <strong>2002</strong> and of the profit, total<br />
recognised ga<strong>in</strong>s and cash flows of the Group for the year<br />
then ended. In our op<strong>in</strong>ion the <strong>accounts</strong> of the <strong>Unilever</strong><br />
Group, and of <strong>Unilever</strong> N.V. and <strong>Unilever</strong> PLC respectively,<br />
have been properly prepared <strong>in</strong> accordance with Title 9,<br />
Book 2 of the Civil Code <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands and the United<br />
K<strong>in</strong>gdom Companies Act 1985. In our op<strong>in</strong>ion, the auditable<br />
part of the directors’ remuneration report has been properly<br />
prepared <strong>in</strong> accordance with the applicable requirements <strong>in</strong><br />
the Netherlands and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom.<br />
United States op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />
In our op<strong>in</strong>ion, the <strong>accounts</strong> present fairly, <strong>in</strong> all material<br />
respects, the f<strong>in</strong>ancial position of the <strong>Unilever</strong> Group<br />
at 31 December <strong>2002</strong> and 2001, and the results of its<br />
operations, total recognised ga<strong>in</strong>s and its cash flows for each<br />
of the three years <strong>in</strong> the period ended 31 December <strong>2002</strong>,<br />
<strong>in</strong> accordance with the account<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation and policies<br />
on pages 66 to 68.<br />
The account<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples applied vary <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> significant<br />
respects from account<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples generally accepted<br />
<strong>in</strong> the United States. The effect of the major differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of net profit and capital and reserves<br />
is shown on pages 118 and 119.<br />
As discussed <strong>in</strong> note 18 to the consolidated <strong>accounts</strong>, the<br />
Group changed its method of account<strong>in</strong>g for deferred taxes<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>2002</strong> <strong>in</strong> accordance with account<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples generally<br />
accepted <strong>in</strong> the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. The change has been<br />
accounted for by restat<strong>in</strong>g comparative <strong>in</strong>formation at<br />
31 December 2001 and 2000, and for the years then ended.<br />
PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V.<br />
Rotterdam, The Netherlands<br />
As auditors of <strong>Unilever</strong> N.V.<br />
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP<br />
Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors<br />
London, England<br />
As auditors of <strong>Unilever</strong> PLC<br />
4 March 2003<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial Statements