26.11.2012 Views

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case Narrative<br />

Client: TNU-HANFORD <strong>RC</strong>-<strong>047</strong> W.O. #: 11343-606-001-9999-00<br />

LVL #: 06041,904 Date Received: 04-28-2006<br />

SDG/<strong>SAF</strong> # K0303/<strong>RC</strong>-<strong>047</strong><br />

SEMIVOLATILE<br />

Fifteen (15) soil (mice) samples were collected on 04-03,05-2006.<br />

The samples and <strong>the</strong>ir associated QC samples were extracted according to Lionville Laboratory<br />

SOPs based on SW 846 method 3540C on 06-02-2006 and analyzed according to criteria set forth<br />

in Lionville Laboratory SOPS based on SW 846 Method 8270C for TCL Semivolatile target<br />

compounds on 06-29,30-2006 and 07-02-2006.<br />

The following is a summary <strong>of</strong> QC results accompanying <strong>the</strong> sample results. Lionville Laboratory<br />

Inc (LvLI) certifies that all test results meet <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> NELAC except as noted below:<br />

1. All results presented in this report are derived from samples that met LvLI's sample<br />

acceptance policy with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> some discrepancies, which were documented on <strong>the</strong><br />

Sample Receipt Checklist.<br />

2. All samples were stored in a refrigerator (ID# R003) that malfunctioned and failed to<br />

maintain <strong>the</strong> required sample storing temperature (4°C +/- 2°C) on 05-10-2006. A copy <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Sample Discrepancy Report (SDR) has been enclosed.<br />

3. Samples were extracted outside required holding time. A copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sample Discrepancy<br />

Report (SDR) has been enclosed.<br />

4. Due to <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample matrix, approximately 2g initial sample volume for <strong>the</strong><br />

extraction and reduced final volume was used for <strong>the</strong> analysis. A copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sample<br />

Extraction Record has been enclosed for detail information.<br />

5. All sample results were reported on a wet-weight basis.<br />

6. Non-target compounds were detected in <strong>the</strong> samples.<br />

7. Seventy-seven (77) <strong>of</strong> one hundred fourteen (114) surrogate recoveries were outside<br />

acceptance criteria. A copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sample Discrepancy Report (SDR) has been enclosed.<br />

The results presented in this report relate only to <strong>the</strong> analytical testing and conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples at receipt and during storage. All pages <strong>of</strong> this report are integral parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> analytical data. Therefore, this report should only be reproduced in its entirety <strong>of</strong> 5 3 pages.<br />

208 Welsh Pool Road • Exton, PA 19341- 1313 • (610) 280-<strong>300</strong>0 • Fax (610) 280-3041<br />

4(30.tVLi6(Cf4iL•

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!