26.11.2012 Views

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case Narrative<br />

Client: TNU-I IANFORD <strong>RC</strong>-<strong>047</strong> W.O. #: 11343-606-001-9999-00<br />

LVL #: 0604L904 Date Received: 04-28-2006<br />

SDG/<strong>SAF</strong> # K0303/<strong>RC</strong>-<strong>047</strong><br />

PCB<br />

Fifteen (15) solid (composed <strong>of</strong> mice) samples were collected on 04-03,05-2006.<br />

The samples and <strong>the</strong>ir associated QC samples were extracted on 06-02-2006 and analyzed<br />

according to Lionville Laboratory SOPs based on SW846, 3rd Edition procedures on 06-02,23-<br />

2006. The extraction procedure was based on method 3540C and <strong>the</strong> extracts were analyzed based<br />

on method 8082.<br />

The following is a summary <strong>of</strong> QC results accompanying <strong>the</strong> sample results. Lionville Laboratory<br />

Inc (LvLI) certifies that all test results meet <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> NELAC except as noted below:<br />

1. All results presented in this report are derived from samples that met LvLI's sample<br />

acceptance policy with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> some discrepancies, which were documented on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Sample Receipt Checklist.<br />

2. The samples were received outside extraction holding time. All samples were extracted<br />

outside holding time due to <strong>the</strong> refrigerator (ID # R003) malfunction. A copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sample Discrepancy Report (SDR) has been enclosed.<br />

3. The soil sample results were reported on a wet-weight basis. All samples were extracted<br />

using reduced sample volume due to <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample matrix. A copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sample Extraction Record has been enclosed.<br />

4. The method blank was below <strong>the</strong> reporting limits for all target compounds.<br />

5. One (1) <strong>of</strong> thirty-eight (38) surrogate recoveries was outside acceptance criteria. A copy <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Sample Discrepancy Report (SDR) has been enclosed.<br />

6. All blank spike recoveries were within acceptance criteria.<br />

7. All matrix spike recoveries were within acceptance criteria.<br />

8. The initial calibrations associated with this data set were within acceptance criteria.<br />

The results presented in this report relate only to <strong>the</strong> analytical testing and conditlom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples at receipt and during storage. All pages <strong>of</strong> this report are integral parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> analytical data. Therefore, this report should only be reproduced in its entirety <strong>of</strong> 2 7 pages.<br />

208 Welsh Pool Road • Exton, PA 19341- 1313 • (610) 280-<strong>300</strong>0 • Fax (610) 280-3041<br />

nefnneos+r.-r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!