26.11.2012 Views

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SAF-RC-047 100 & 300 Area Component of the ... - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case Narrative<br />

Client: TNU-HANFORD <strong>RC</strong>-<strong>047</strong> W.O. #: 11343-606-001-9999-00<br />

LVL #: 0604L750 Date Received: 04-12-2006<br />

SDG/<strong>SAF</strong> # K0303/<strong>RC</strong>-<strong>047</strong><br />

CHLORINATED PESTICIDES<br />

One (1) solid samples was collected on 04-03-2006.<br />

The sample and it's associated QC samples were extracted on 04-23-2006 and analyzed according<br />

to Lionville Laboratory SOPS based on SW846, 3rd Edition procedures on 05-03,07-2006. The<br />

extraction procedure was based on method 3540C and <strong>the</strong> extracts were analyzed based on method<br />

8081. All soil samples are reported on a dry weight base unless requested by <strong>the</strong> client, required by<br />

<strong>the</strong> method or noted o<strong>the</strong>rwise.<br />

The following is a summary <strong>of</strong> QC results accompanying <strong>the</strong> sample results. Lionville Laboratory<br />

Inc (LvLI) certifies that all test results meet <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> NELAC except as noted below:<br />

1. The sample was analyzed within required holding time.<br />

2. The sample was extracted 20 days outside <strong>of</strong> recommended hold time. A copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sample Discrepancy Report has been enclosed.<br />

The sample and it's associated QC samples received Copper-Sulfur cleanups according to<br />

Lionville Laboratory SOPS based on SW846 methods 3660A respectively.<br />

4. The method blank was below <strong>the</strong> reporting limits for all target compounds.<br />

Two (2) <strong>of</strong> six (6) surrogate recoveries were outside acceptance criteria. A copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sample Discrepancy Report (SDR) has been enclosed.<br />

6. The blank spike recoveries were within acceptance criteria.<br />

7. Matrix spike analyses are associated with LvLi lot 0604L748.<br />

8. The results for soil samples were reported on a wet-weight basis.<br />

9. The sample 011 required a 4-fold instrument dilutions due to matrix. Reporting limits have<br />

been adjusted to reflect <strong>the</strong> necessary dilutions.<br />

10. The initial calibrations associated with this data set were within acceptance criteria.<br />

The results presented in this report relate only to <strong>the</strong> analytical testing and wnditiona <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> samples at receipt mid dining storage. All pages <strong>of</strong> this report are integral pans <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> analytical data. Therefore, flus report should only be reproduced in its entirety <strong>of</strong> 42 7 pages.<br />

208 Welsh Pool Road • Exton, PA 19341- 1313 • (610) 280-<strong>300</strong>0 • Fax (610) 280-3041<br />

MGMG88Z

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!