11.07.2015 Views

Untitled - St.Francis Magazine

Untitled - St.Francis Magazine

Untitled - St.Francis Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>St</strong> <strong>Francis</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong> Vol 8, No 2 | April 2012 cast lots to divide his garments. 35 And the people stood by, watching, but the rulers scoffed at him, saying, “He saved others; let him save himself, if he is the Christ of God, his Chosen One!” 36 The soldiers also mocked him, coming up and offering him sour wine 37 and saying, “If you are the King of the Jews, save yourself!” 38 There was also an inscription over him, “This is the King of the Jews.” 39 One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!” 40 But the other rebuked him, saying, “Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? 41 And we indeed justly, for we are receiving the due reward of our deeds; but this man 44 has done nothing wrong.” 42 And he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” 43 And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.” From what we read from the discourses in 22:70 and in 23:2-­‐3 we see that the term “Son of God” was used as a synonym for Christ, king, and King of the Jews because they are used interchangeably. 45 Luke uses the term “Son of God” elsewhere in his Gospel to denote divine sonship rather than deity per se. In Luke 3:38 Adam is also called the “son of God.” We know that this does not suggest that Adam was divine in nature. The term refers to the unique relationship Adam had with God. In Luke 20:36 we read: “For they cannot die anymore, because they are equal to angels and are sons of God, sons of the resurrection.” In this verse divine sonship is attributed to those who attain to the resurrection from the dead. Luke 20:36 indicates that the term denoted being in a special, covenantal relationship with God. 44 The thief’s response to the other thief, referring to Jesus as “this man,” appears to indicate that though he recognized Jesus as the promised messianic king he did not recognize him as God. 45 This same relationship between the terms is seen in Matthew 26:63-­‐68 and 27:39-­‐44. 196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!