Enhancing Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Socialization Through the Metaphor <strong>of</strong> TraditionTo support this goal, this article explores how <strong>public</strong> administration theoriesmight be organized in an innovative manner that could help practitioners betternavigate the contemporary governance context. This organizing frameworkconsiders the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>public</strong> administration from three distinct socialperspectives: those <strong>of</strong> the elected <strong>of</strong>ficial, the citizen, and the practitioner. Theperspective <strong>of</strong> each is developed as a sociological ideal type (Weber, 1949)comprised <strong>of</strong> coherent sets <strong>of</strong> ideas, referred to as traditions (Stout, 2006).Traditions are social and intellectual presuppositions about activities andinquiries that evolve through time (MacIntyre, 1988). This fits anunderstanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>public</strong> administration as an enterprise “characterized by aninterlocking set <strong>of</strong> values, not by rigid doctrine, certainly by nothing resemblinga scientific paradigm …” (Waldo, 1980, p.77).The metaphor <strong>of</strong> tradition enables faculty and students to organize competingideas in order to make more conscious choices among them, instead <strong>of</strong>presenting <strong>public</strong> administration as a mixed bag <strong>of</strong> inherent philosophicaltensions and fragmentation that each practitioner must sort out alone. It mustbe noted that the substantive content <strong>of</strong> traditions may be organized differently.For example, organizing themes are commonly historical in nature, referring toOrthodox <strong>public</strong> administration, New Public Administration, New PublicManagement, New Public Service, and the like. The three distinct traditions <strong>of</strong><strong>public</strong> administration presented here emerged during a hermeneutic study <strong>of</strong>the field’s theoretical literature that used the basis <strong>of</strong> legitimacy as thecategorizing characteristic (Stout, 2007). Each <strong>of</strong> these traditions promotes adifferent conceptualization <strong>of</strong> the administrative role, and each provides animportant clarification <strong>of</strong> normative commitments when choosing among them.Combining this purpose and method, this article explores the process <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essional socialization in the field <strong>of</strong> <strong>public</strong> administration, the problem <strong>of</strong>competing ideations <strong>of</strong> the legitimate administrative role, three distincttraditions framing the administrative role, and the possible use <strong>of</strong> thesetraditions in pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>education</strong> for the more intentional socialization <strong>of</strong><strong>public</strong> administration students into specific role conceptualizations.PROFESSIONAL SOCIALIZATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONAll processes <strong>of</strong> socialization rely on concepts such as social role and sense <strong>of</strong>identity. Role conception is an internalized set <strong>of</strong> beliefs and ideas that a person holdsabout one’s place and purpose in society, which defines how one may act (Selznick,1957). Alternatively, role conceptualization is an external set <strong>of</strong> norms about theappropriate enactment <strong>of</strong> a given social role. The administrative role <strong>of</strong>ten isdescribed as a “cohesive set <strong>of</strong> job-related values and attitudes that provides the<strong>public</strong> administrator a stable set <strong>of</strong> expectations about his or her responsibilities”(Selden, Brewer, & Brudney, 1999, p.175). This social role is in large partconsidered to be a pr<strong>of</strong>ession, which requires, among other things, a commitment toa calling or enduring set <strong>of</strong> normative and behavioral expectations, as well asspecialized training or <strong>education</strong> (Moore & Rosenblum, 1970).290 Journal <strong>of</strong> Public Affairs Education
Enhancing Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Socialization Through the Metaphor <strong>of</strong> TraditionBased on a library database search, pr<strong>of</strong>essional socialization during theacademic experience is <strong>of</strong> great concern to many pr<strong>of</strong>essions, yet receives littleattention in <strong>public</strong> administration literature. However, through accreditation bythe National Association <strong>of</strong> Schools <strong>of</strong> Public Affairs and Administration(<strong>NASPAA</strong>), MPA programs across the country have become fairly uniform intheir admission requirements, curricula, and teaching approaches (R.B.Denhardt, 2001). According to the <strong>NASPAA</strong> code <strong>of</strong> good practice, eachmember “focuses on the preparation <strong>of</strong> students for pr<strong>of</strong>essional careers in <strong>public</strong>service, emphasizing both the values and ethics <strong>of</strong> <strong>public</strong> service, and thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills and knowledge” (<strong>NASPAA</strong>, 2006, emphasisadded). Some programs actually identify this as “a socialization sequence”(Georgia, 2006). Furthermore, research suggests that pr<strong>of</strong>essional socialization isa significant factor in <strong>public</strong> service motivation (Perry, 1997). Therefore, we canassume that this process is important to the field.The manner in which pr<strong>of</strong>essional identities are believed to develop can bedescribed as a general causal relationship <strong>of</strong> indeterminate direction, or at least astarting place, whereby (1) a person is motivated by a variety <strong>of</strong> personal andsocial factors to adopt a particular social role, which (2) entails a specific set <strong>of</strong>attitudes and actions, which in turn (3) impact personal role conception andnormative theoretical role conceptualizations, which in turn (4) are transmittedand validated through pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>education</strong>.Figure 1 presents a new graphic depicting this relationship, with a focus on theelements <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional socialization that are most impacted by academia.However, it is important to note that socialization is a nonlinear process, whereexternal sources <strong>of</strong> evaluation and internal sources <strong>of</strong> reflection combine in anevolving developmental cycle (Weidman, Twale, & Stein, 2001). (See Figure 1.)Figure 1.The academic pr<strong>of</strong>essional role conceptualization processJournal <strong>of</strong> Public Affairs Education 291