journal of public affairs education - NASPAA *The Global Standard ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Enhancing Professional Socialization Through the Metaphor of TraditionKatz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.Kettl, D.F. (2000). Public administration at the millennium: The state of the field. Journal of PublicAdministration Research and Theory, 10(1), 7-34.King, C.S. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in publicadministration. Public Administration Review, 58, 317-327.King, C.S., Patterson, P.M., & Scott, F.E. (2000). Still enthralled with modernity? Towardpostrationalist discourse theories. American Review of Public Administration, 30(3), 221-224.King, C.S. & Stivers, C.M. (with Box, R.C., Chain, L.W., Foley, D., Gray, J.E., Hammel, R.,Kelley, M.M., Koyalich, W.W. , Jr., Nank, R., Sagen, D.A., Timney, N.M., & Zanetti, L.).(1998). Government is us: Public administration in an antigovernment era. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.King, C.S., & Zanetti, L.A. (2005). Transformational public service: Portraits of theory in practice.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Light, P. (1999). The new public service. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Lowery, D., & Whitaker, G.P. (1994). Comparing public administration and policy analysis approachesto public service education. American Review of Public Administration, 24(1), 25-42.Lowi, T.J. (1979). The end of liberalism: The second republic of the United States (2nd ed.). New York:Norton.Lowi, T.J. (1993). Legitimizing public administration: A disturbed dissent. Public AdministrationReview, 53(3), 261-264.MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Mazmanian, D. (2005, October 14). Presidential Address. Paper presented at the 2005 NASPAAAnnual Conference, Washington, D.C.McSwite, O.C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.Moore, W.E., & Rosenblum, G.W. (1970). The professions: Roles and rules. New York: RussellSage Foundation.Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.NASPAA (National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration) (2006). Code of goodpractice. Retrieved October 26, 2006, from http://www.naspaa.org/codeofgoodpractice/index.asp.NASPAA (2007). Accreditation-seeking process. Retrieved February 23, 2007, fromhttp://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/seeking/process/template.asp.NASPAA (2008). Standards. Retrieved June 18, 2008, fromhttp://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/seeking/reference/standards.asp.NASPAA (2009). Standards review 2009. Washington, D.C.: National Association of Schools of PublicAffairs and Administration.Newland, C.A. (2003). The facilitative state, political executive aggrandizement, and public servicechallenges. Administration & Society, 35(4), 379-407.Perry, J.L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability andvalidity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.Perry, J.L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Researchand Theory, 7(2), 181-197.Pescosolido, B.A., & Hess, D.K. (1996). Models for the professional socialization of graduate students.Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.Peters, B.G., & Pierre, J. (2000). Citizens versus the new public manager: The problem of mutualempowerment. Administration & Society, 32(1), 9-28.314 Journal of Public Affairs Education
Enhancing Professional Socialization Through the Metaphor of TraditionPugh, D. (1991). The origins of ethical frameworks in public administration. In J. Bowman (Ed.),Ethical frontiers in public management (pp. 9-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Rainey, H.G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the serviceethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16(4), 288-302.Rosenbloom, D.H. (1983). Public administration theory and the separation of powers. PublicAdministration Review, 43(3), 219-227.Rutgers, M.R. (2001). Splitting the universe: On the relevance of dichotomies for the study of publicadministration. Administration & Society, 33(1), 3-20.Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal ofEducation Policy, 16(2), 149-161.Schein, E.H. (1968). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. IndustrialManagement Review, 9(1), 1-15.Selden, S.C., Brewer, G.A., & Brudney, J.L. (1999). Reconciling competing values in publicadministration: Understanding the administrative role concept. Administration & Society, 31(2),171-204.Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Staats, E. (1988). Public service and the public interest. Public Administration Review, 48(2), 601-605.Stever, J.A. (1988). The end of public administration: Problems of the profession in the post-progressive era.Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers, Inc.Stout, M. (2006). A Samurai’s lineage: Theoretical traditions in public administration. AdministrativeTheory & Praxis, 28(4), 618-630.Stout, M. (2007). Bureaucrats, entrepreneurs, and stewards: Seeking legitimacy in contemporary governance.Unpublished Dissertation, Arizona State University, Phoenix.Stout, M. (2009). You say you want a revolution? International Journal of Organization Theory andBehavior, 12(2), 291-309.Svara, J.H. (2006). Politicians and administrators in the political process: A review of themes andissues in the literature. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(12), 953-976.Teschendorf, B., & Nemshick, M. (2001). Faculty roles in professional socialization. Journal ofPhysical Therapy Education, 15(1), 4-10.Tong, C.H., & Straussman, J.D. (2003). A master of public administration degree with Chinesecharacteristics? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 2, 105-115.van Bockel, J., & Noordegraaf, M. (2006). Identifying identities: Performance-driven, but professionalpublic managers. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 585-597.Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E.H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B.M. Staw& L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Waldo, D. (1980). The enterprise of public administration: A summary. Novato, CA: Chandler &Sharp Publishers.Waldo, D. (1984). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration(2nd ed.). New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.Wamsley, G.L. (1990). The agency perspective: Public administrators and agential leaders. In G.L.Wamsley, R.N. Bacher, C.T. Goodsell, P.S. Kronenberg, J.A. Rohr, C.M. Stivers, et al. (Eds.),Refounding public administration (pp. 114-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: The Free Press.Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.Weidman, J.C., Twale, D.J., & Stein, E.L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students inhigher education: A perilous passage? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Journal of Public Affairs Education 315
Page 1 and 2:
Summer 2009 Volume 15, No. 3JPAEJOU
Page 5 and 6:
the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Page 7 and 8: Public Values As aCore Element of N
Page 9 and 10: Public Values as a Core Element of
Page 15 and 16: How Do We Know What They Know?Evalu
Page 33 and 34: Enhancing Professional Socializatio
Page 57: Enhancing Professional Socializatio
Page 61 and 62: Staying Connected: MPA StudentPerce
Page 63 and 64: Staying Connected: MPA Student Perc
Page 77 and 78: Teaching Public Administration As a
Page 91 and 92: Badgers & Hoosiers:An Interstate Co
Page 93 and 94: Badgers & Hoosiers: An Interstate C
Page 103 and 104: Operation PSA: The Action Learningo
Page 105 and 106: Operation PSA: The Action Learning
Page 107 and 108: Operation PSA: The Action Learning
Page 109 and 110:
Operation PSA: The Action Learning
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Introduction of Government ProcessM
Page 127 and 128:
Introduction of Government Process
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
show all

journal of public affairs education - NASPAA *The Global Standard ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?