Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs
Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs
Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Reports), <strong>and</strong> Module 5 (Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Study<br />
Reports). Modules 2 to 5 should be<br />
prepared on the basis of the CTD guidel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Part 1 consists of documents requested by<br />
each regulatory authority. Detailed<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards are shown <strong>in</strong> the Appendix.<br />
Electronic specifications for the CTD<br />
(eCTD) have been prepared <strong>and</strong> have been<br />
applied to application data submitted<br />
electronically s<strong>in</strong>ce April 1, 2005 (Notification<br />
Nos. 0527004, 0825001, <strong>and</strong> 0707-(3)<br />
[partially revised] of the Evaluation <strong>and</strong><br />
Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division, PFSB dated May 27,<br />
2004, August 25, 2008, <strong>and</strong> July 7, 2009,<br />
respectively).<br />
In addition to the 1 year st<strong>and</strong>ard approval<br />
review time of the MHLW for approval of new<br />
drugs from April 1, 2000 (dated March 28,<br />
2000) (exclud<strong>in</strong>g the time taken by applicants<br />
to prepare responses, etc.), the time allotted<br />
to the applicant is also 1 year so that the time<br />
from the application to market<strong>in</strong>g approval is<br />
a maximum of 2 years. The applicant is<br />
requested by the MHLW to withdraw the<br />
application <strong>in</strong> case a longer time is required<br />
for respond<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>quiries or conduct<strong>in</strong>g<br />
additional studies (Notification No. 0604001<br />
of the Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division,<br />
PFSB dated June 4, 2004).<br />
In June 2010, “Po<strong>in</strong>ts to consider <strong>in</strong><br />
applications for shorten<strong>in</strong>g the PMDA review<br />
period for new drugs” was issued. This<br />
document <strong>in</strong>cludes po<strong>in</strong>ts to consider on the<br />
<strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>Regulations</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>:<br />
applicants side to achieve the target PMDA<br />
review periods of 12 months for ord<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
reviews <strong>and</strong> 9 months for priority reviews by<br />
2013 (Office Communication of the<br />
Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division <strong>and</strong><br />
Compliance <strong>and</strong> Narcotics Division, PFSB,<br />
MHLW dated June 9, 2010).<br />
On April 17, 2008, “Po<strong>in</strong>ts to Consider for<br />
Reviewers Related to New Drug Approval<br />
Review Work” was issued. This showed the<br />
basic conditions related to new drug review<br />
activities <strong>in</strong> the PMDA <strong>and</strong> was <strong>in</strong>tended to<br />
clarify the ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts to consider <strong>in</strong> reviews<br />
<strong>and</strong> to assure uniform awareness of PMDA<br />
reviewers concern<strong>in</strong>g review work.<br />
<strong>Japan</strong>ese website:<br />
http://www.pmda.go.jp/topics/h200417koh<br />
yo.html<br />
English website:<br />
http://www.pmda.go.jp/english/services/re<br />
views/others.html<br />
4.3 Priority Review System <strong>and</strong><br />
Designation of Drug Products for<br />
Priority Reviews<br />
1) Priority review system<br />
Drug approval reviews are normally<br />
processed <strong>in</strong> the order that the application<br />
forms are received, but for drugs designated<br />
as orphan drugs <strong>and</strong> other drugs considered<br />
to be especially important from a medical<br />
st<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t such as new drugs to treat serious<br />
2011-3 - 39 -