29.11.2012 Views

Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs

Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs

Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

diseases, a decision must be made whether<br />

or not to specify an overall evaluation of (1)<br />

the seriousness of the targeted disease <strong>and</strong><br />

(2) the cl<strong>in</strong>ical usefulness, as stipulated <strong>in</strong><br />

Article 14-(7) of the <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> Affairs<br />

Law. With this system, applications for<br />

specified drugs are reviewed on a priority<br />

basis (Notification No. 0227016 of the<br />

Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division, PFSB<br />

dated February 27, 2004)<br />

(1) Priority review criteria<br />

(A) Seriousness of <strong>in</strong>dicated diseases<br />

(i) Diseases with important effects<br />

on patient’s survival (fatal<br />

diseases)<br />

(ii) Progressive <strong>and</strong> irreversible<br />

diseases with marked effects on<br />

daily life<br />

(iii) Others<br />

(B) Overall assessment of therapeutic<br />

usefulness<br />

(i) There is no exist<strong>in</strong>g method of<br />

treatment.<br />

(ii) Therapeutic usefulness with<br />

respect to exist<strong>in</strong>g treatment<br />

a) St<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />

efficacy<br />

b) St<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />

safety<br />

c) Reduction of<br />

physical <strong>and</strong><br />

mental burden<br />

<strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>Regulations</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>:<br />

on the patient<br />

(2) Designation of drug products for<br />

priority reviews<br />

When drugs are designated for priority<br />

reviews, op<strong>in</strong>ions of experts on such<br />

designations are compiled by the PMDA<br />

immediately after the application <strong>and</strong><br />

reported to the MHLW. Based on this<br />

report, the Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Division decides whether or not to apply<br />

the priority review. The Evaluation <strong>and</strong><br />

Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division notifies this decision to<br />

the applicant <strong>and</strong> the PMDA. The<br />

Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division reports<br />

this application to the next meet<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

review committee concerned of the<br />

PAFSC <strong>and</strong> obta<strong>in</strong>s their approval.<br />

Products for priority review are given<br />

priority at each stage of the review<br />

process as much as possible. When<br />

products subject to priority review are<br />

approved as new drugs, this fact is made<br />

public.<br />

2) Review of products designated for<br />

priority face-to-face advice<br />

When products have been designated<br />

for priority face-to-face advice at the<br />

development stage, it is possible to obta<strong>in</strong><br />

priority face-to-face advice on <strong>in</strong>dications<br />

<strong>and</strong> other items concern<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

designated product. Products are<br />

designated on the basis of an overall<br />

evaluation of the seriousness of <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

2011-3 - 40 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!