Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs
Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs
Pharmaceutical Administration and Regulations in Japan - Nihs
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
diseases, a decision must be made whether<br />
or not to specify an overall evaluation of (1)<br />
the seriousness of the targeted disease <strong>and</strong><br />
(2) the cl<strong>in</strong>ical usefulness, as stipulated <strong>in</strong><br />
Article 14-(7) of the <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> Affairs<br />
Law. With this system, applications for<br />
specified drugs are reviewed on a priority<br />
basis (Notification No. 0227016 of the<br />
Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division, PFSB<br />
dated February 27, 2004)<br />
(1) Priority review criteria<br />
(A) Seriousness of <strong>in</strong>dicated diseases<br />
(i) Diseases with important effects<br />
on patient’s survival (fatal<br />
diseases)<br />
(ii) Progressive <strong>and</strong> irreversible<br />
diseases with marked effects on<br />
daily life<br />
(iii) Others<br />
(B) Overall assessment of therapeutic<br />
usefulness<br />
(i) There is no exist<strong>in</strong>g method of<br />
treatment.<br />
(ii) Therapeutic usefulness with<br />
respect to exist<strong>in</strong>g treatment<br />
a) St<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />
efficacy<br />
b) St<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />
safety<br />
c) Reduction of<br />
physical <strong>and</strong><br />
mental burden<br />
<strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>Regulations</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>:<br />
on the patient<br />
(2) Designation of drug products for<br />
priority reviews<br />
When drugs are designated for priority<br />
reviews, op<strong>in</strong>ions of experts on such<br />
designations are compiled by the PMDA<br />
immediately after the application <strong>and</strong><br />
reported to the MHLW. Based on this<br />
report, the Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Division decides whether or not to apply<br />
the priority review. The Evaluation <strong>and</strong><br />
Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division notifies this decision to<br />
the applicant <strong>and</strong> the PMDA. The<br />
Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Licens<strong>in</strong>g Division reports<br />
this application to the next meet<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
review committee concerned of the<br />
PAFSC <strong>and</strong> obta<strong>in</strong>s their approval.<br />
Products for priority review are given<br />
priority at each stage of the review<br />
process as much as possible. When<br />
products subject to priority review are<br />
approved as new drugs, this fact is made<br />
public.<br />
2) Review of products designated for<br />
priority face-to-face advice<br />
When products have been designated<br />
for priority face-to-face advice at the<br />
development stage, it is possible to obta<strong>in</strong><br />
priority face-to-face advice on <strong>in</strong>dications<br />
<strong>and</strong> other items concern<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
designated product. Products are<br />
designated on the basis of an overall<br />
evaluation of the seriousness of <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
2011-3 - 40 -