30.11.2012 Views

Download Current Issue - SAIS

Download Current Issue - SAIS

Download Current Issue - SAIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This scenario plays out across several<br />

regions of India, where Kumar<br />

and other struggling farmers are held<br />

hostage to lack of power availability,<br />

rapidly receding groundwater levels<br />

and vagaries of the monsoon. Nowhere<br />

is the link between water, energy and<br />

poverty alleviation more stark than in<br />

these regions, creating a cycle that often<br />

spirals out of control.<br />

The agriculture sector in India uses<br />

85 percent of the available freshwater.<br />

That groundwater is India’s predominant<br />

water resource for agriculture is<br />

reflected in the fact that the net irrigated<br />

area under canal irrigation fell from 41<br />

percent in 1971 to 31 percent in 1999,<br />

while during the same period the area<br />

irrigated by groundwater (tube wells)<br />

increased from 14 percent to 36 percent.<br />

Higher agricultural productivity,<br />

declining farm sizes and more frequent<br />

droughts have induced a dramatic rise<br />

in groundwater utilization. Decreasing<br />

public investment in irrigated infrastructure<br />

(for example, canals) has also<br />

meant more groundwater use. During<br />

the period 1971–2010, the area irrigated<br />

by groundwater increased sevenfold:<br />

from 5 million hectares (about 12.5<br />

million acres) to more than 35 million<br />

hectares (about 87.5 million acres).<br />

More reliable groundwater delivery<br />

and declining extraction costs due<br />

to advances in technology and, most<br />

important, government subsidies for<br />

power and for installation of groundwater<br />

structures (for example, irrigation<br />

pump sets) have contributed to this<br />

growth. With 16.8 million energized<br />

pump sets throughout the country, India<br />

has more than four times the number of<br />

irrigation structures of China, Iran,<br />

Mexico and the United States combined.<br />

Agriculture and Water Waste<br />

Compounding the problem of water use<br />

is the poor farm-irrigation efficiency of<br />

only 20 percent to 50 percent. The other<br />

50 percent to 80 percent of irrigation<br />

water is wasted. Combining these data<br />

42 <strong>SAIS</strong>PHERE<br />

indicates the agricultural sector in India<br />

is squandering about half of the country’s<br />

total freshwater supply. However,<br />

from a basin perspective, we find that<br />

much of the “wasted” water is reused, so<br />

the loss is less than the figures indicate.<br />

Nevertheless, water-use efficiency is<br />

a key consideration, and yield per unit<br />

of water should be maximized. The<br />

latter also has a direct and deleterious<br />

impact on the degree of exploitation of<br />

groundwater and falling groundwater<br />

tables across India. Nowhere is this<br />

depletion more acute than in north<br />

India, where the states of Rajasthan,<br />

Punjab and Haryana have all the ingredients<br />

for groundwater depletion: staggering<br />

population growth, rapid economic<br />

development and water-hungry<br />

farms, accounting for about 95 percent<br />

To put these numbers in perspective, the $6.6 billion power<br />

subsidy is comparable to the country’s annual expenditure for<br />

education and more than double its expenditure for health.<br />

of their groundwater use. Data provided<br />

by India’s Ministry of Water Resources<br />

suggest that groundwater use is exceeding<br />

natural replenishment, but the<br />

regional rate of depletion is unknown.<br />

Groundwater levels have been declining<br />

by an average of 1 meter every three<br />

years (1 foot per year). More than 109<br />

cubic kilometers (26 cubic miles) of<br />

groundwater disappeared between 2002<br />

and 2008—double the capacity of India’s<br />

largest surface water reservoir, the Upper<br />

Waingang, and triple that of Lake Mead,<br />

the largest man-made reservoir in the<br />

United States. Observations from the<br />

NASA Gravity Recovery and Climate<br />

Experiment satellites and simulated soilwater<br />

variations from a data-integrating<br />

hydrological modeling system show that<br />

groundwater is being depleted at a mean<br />

rate in excess of the rate of replenishment<br />

in the Indian states of Rajasthan,<br />

Punjab and Haryana (including Delhi).<br />

On the energy front, there are inefficiencies<br />

as well. The agricultural sector,<br />

on average, accounts for about 22 percent<br />

of the total electricity consumption<br />

in India. The figure is somewhat higher<br />

in agricultural states such as Andhra<br />

Pradesh (31 percent), Gujarat (32 percent),<br />

Haryana (36 percent), Karnataka<br />

(36 percent), Madhya Pradesh (30<br />

percent) and Tamil Nadu (22 percent).<br />

However, from a revenue perspective,<br />

the sale of this electricity amounts to no<br />

more than 5 percent to 10 percent of the<br />

state electricity utility’s revenue.<br />

The reason for this perverse state<br />

of financial affairs is the adoption of<br />

flat-rate pricing for agricultural power.<br />

Under this system, when a farmer<br />

pays a fixed price per horsepower per<br />

month for electricity, the marginal<br />

cost of pumping is zero. This leads to<br />

energy waste, overpumping and inefficient<br />

selection of crops. Moreover, flatrate<br />

pumping masks the true cost of<br />

power to farmers. When unreliability<br />

is factored in, most farmers incur costs<br />

of 4.5 to 6.6 cents per kilowatt-hour,<br />

more than what typical urban dwellers<br />

pay. From a political and economic<br />

perspective, the flat-rate structure<br />

enables the state to give the impression<br />

of providing subsidized power to the<br />

rural, voting population whether or<br />

not that population actually receives<br />

the intended subsidy.<br />

Summing up, the tariff structure and<br />

the combination of poor technology<br />

and management are responsible for<br />

water loss, unsustainable exploitation of<br />

groundwater, and the high energy losses<br />

associated with the distribution and<br />

end use of electricity in groundwater<br />

pumping.<br />

Water-Energy Nexus<br />

Access to groundwater is the most critical<br />

factor determining the reliability of<br />

irrigation water supplies, which in turn<br />

is key to the full “green revolution”<br />

package of fertilizers, seeds and other<br />

inputs. Without reliable water supplies,<br />

the risk associated with other investments<br />

in agricultural production is high<br />

because everything can be lost due to<br />

variations in precipitation, forcing small<br />

and marginal farmers into poverty.<br />

Since groundwater availability is<br />

relatively independent of fluctuations<br />

in rainfall and there is often substantial<br />

interannual storage, a farmer’s access to<br />

water is rarely threatened by climatic<br />

changes—at least on a short-term basis.<br />

This gives groundwater irrigation a substantial<br />

advantage over surface irrigation<br />

with regard to poverty alleviation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!