WHOI-90-52

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 2 Lis of Participants - Marie Inruentation Panel Meeting, September 12-14, 1989, Woods Hole Oceanogrphic Initution, Woods Hole, MA. Mr. John Alden Mr. Bob Black Dr. Paul Bienfang Mr. Paul Boutin Mr. Lawson Brigham Dr. James M. Broadus Mr. Neil Brown Mr. Terrence L.Burch Mr. David Butler Mr. Mark Chramiac Mr. Willam Cooper Dr. Thomas Curr Mr. James Darez Mr. Gerald Epstein Mr. John Fueschel Dr. Artur G. Gaies Mr. Gar Glenn Dr. James Griffin Mr. Donald Grossman Mr. James Hannon Mr. James Hanlon Mr. Paul Dudley Har Mr. Portr Hoagland il Dr. Harey Hoskins Prof. John Huguenin Mr. Kenneth Johnson Ms. Megan Jones Mr. Hauke Kite-Powell Mr. Marc Mason Ms. Terr McKee Mr. Frak MacPherson Mr. Willam Pease Mr. Don Philips Mr. Bernard Polanin Mr. Chris Polloni Mr. Kenneth E. Prada Mr. Mortmer Rogoff Mr. Richard Shamp (MS) Alden Products Co. Massachusetts Martime Academy Ocic Institute Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Woos Hole Ocographic Institution EG&G Marne Instrments University of Rhode Island Raytheon, Inc. Congressional Resech Service Southeastern Massachusetts University Royce Instrments Corpration Harard University COMSA T Martime Services Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Massachusetts Centers of Excellence Corpration University of Rhode Islad Coasta Lesing, Inc. Sippica, Inc. ENDECO/YSI, Inc. Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Massachusetts Martime Academy University of Rhode Island Massachusetts Centers of Excellence Corpration Woos Hole Ocographic Institution ENDECO/YSI, Inc. Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Pacer Systems, Inc. Raytheon Executive Offices Government, University, Industr Resech Roundtable, NAS NOAA/ONCO USGS Woos Hole Ocographic Institution Radio Technica Commission for Martime Services Engineering Services Assoiates, Inc. 111 .~. . ¡o " r
Dr. Allyn C. Vine Mr. Malte von Matthiessen Dr. A.J. Wiliams Mr. P. W. Wilson Woos Hole Ocographic Institution ENDECO/YSI, Inc. Woos Hole Ocographic Institution ABS (ret.) 112
Page 2:
-- !! -== -I" 0- ;; .- -rt õ=.. ai
Page 5 and 6:
ABSTRACT Thirteen short papers addr
Page 7 and 8:
The Status and Promise of Electroni
Page 9 and 10:
During the two yeas we have been at
Page 11 and 12:
There is currently a major debate r
Page 13 and 14:
The Inuence of Japanes Industrial T
Page 15 and 16:
profier, an ocea acoustic tomograph
Page 17 and 18:
manufacturing would predict between
Page 19 and 20:
References Advisory Committee for T
Page 21 and 22:
e both winners and losers from the
Page 23 and 24:
ecause they are major end users of
Page 25 and 26:
A final, but not insignificat, set
Page 27 and 28:
Europen Programs in Marne Science a
Page 29 and 30:
proposa included a line item speifi
Page 31 and 32:
from 12 Europe countres, has been a
Page 33 and 34:
ut other industres have been affect
Page 35 and 36:
Indee, if barers fall, the effect c
Page 37 and 38:
References Andre, M. 1987. Resech a
Page 39 and 40:
Peet, G. 1986. Techniques and metho
Page 41 and 42:
These statistics becme a reaity dur
Page 43 and 44:
should make it easier to coordinate
Page 45 and 46:
proposas submitted to SBIR and appr
Page 47 and 48:
An Overview of Technology Transfer
Page 49 and 50:
follow the fortunes of that industr
Page 51 and 52:
choosing resech paths. In general,
Page 53 and 54:
Foundation (NSF) in 1985 and 1988,
Page 55 and 56:
In the field of ocography, spin-off
Page 57 and 58:
Opponunities for technology transfe
Page 59 and 60:
"Strategic Allnces" as an approach
Page 61 and 62:
summar then, the desired result of
Page 63 and 64:
international ecnomic competitivene
Page 65 and 66:
NAT LABS , .. R&D .... ... í7 I DE
Page 67 and 68: the radar were "burned in" for a pe
Page 69 and 70: Differences between ~ Defense am ~
Page 71 and 72: chemica industr's 1989 R&D.2S Bang
Page 73 and 74: We are seing a high use of facsimil
Page 75 and 76: pretty nealy global. Except for the
Page 77 and 78: Stadard-C wil disappoint some users
Page 79 and 80: Introduction The Status and Promi o
Page 81 and 82: optional feature of some systems. T
Page 83 and 84: in order to tae full advantage of t
Page 85 and 86: Fishermen and operators of workboat
Page 87 and 88: of the inherent limitations of rada
Page 89 and 90: One example is an America Petroleum
Page 91 and 92: intensification of domestic aquacul
Page 93 and 94: System Output The system output inc
Page 95 and 96: Although the geographica sce of pro
Page 97 and 98: In contrast with the heavily use wa
Page 99 and 100: "works." The tida data (Figure 2, p
Page 101 and 102: ". o ,. - LI u . '- 0 o .c 0: 0: ::
Page 103 and 104: Concluding Remarks Obviously we are
Page 105 and 106: All is not new. Commentators someti
Page 107 and 108: of academic resech is critica, both
Page 109 and 110: stang point, the model allows the p
Page 111 and 112: of exchange among the university an
Page 113 and 114: and progras. Benefits, on the other
Page 115 and 116: 14: 10 Technology Transfer and Inte
Page 117: 15:30 Where do we stad now? Gary Gl
Page 122: 50272.101 PAGE WHOI.90.52 REPORT DO
show all

WHOI-90-52

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?