30.11.2012 Views

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Consecration |<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel or <strong>the</strong> sacrament, but <strong>the</strong> Words <strong>of</strong> Institution,<br />

which are spoken through men, are words <strong>of</strong> power because Christ<br />

himself speaks through His servants, “M<strong>in</strong>isters act <strong>in</strong> Christ’s stead<br />

and do not represent <strong>the</strong>ir own persons accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> word (Luke<br />

10:16) ‘He who hears you hears me’” (Ap. VII, 47; see also Ap. VII, 28;<br />

XII, 40; XXVIII, 18).<br />

204 <strong>The</strong> only ground on which we can know that we are receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

gift <strong>of</strong> Christ’s body and blood given and shed for us for <strong>the</strong> forgiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>s is <strong>the</strong> consecration done only with <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord.<br />

That is <strong>the</strong> epistemological basis for <strong>the</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ty that we have <strong>the</strong><br />

same <strong>Supper</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord <strong>in</strong>stituted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Upper Room. This sacrament<br />

stands or falls with <strong>the</strong> consecration. <strong>Chemnitz</strong> spells this out so<br />

clearly that his mean<strong>in</strong>g cannot be misunderstood:<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution are spoken <strong>in</strong> our Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong>,<br />

not merely for <strong>the</strong> sake <strong>of</strong> history but to show to <strong>the</strong> church that Christ<br />

himself, through His Word, accord<strong>in</strong>g to His command and promise, is<br />

present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> action <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Supper</strong> and by <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> this word <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

His body and blood to those who eat, For it is He who distributes,<br />

though it be through <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ister; it is He who says: “This is my body,”<br />

It is He who is efficacious through His Word, so that <strong>the</strong> bread is His<br />

body and <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>e His blood, In this way, and because <strong>of</strong> this, we are<br />

sure and believe that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong> we eat, not ord<strong>in</strong>ary bread<br />

and w<strong>in</strong>e, but <strong>the</strong> body and blood <strong>of</strong> Christ. (Ex, 2, 229).<br />

205 <strong>The</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that m<strong>in</strong>isters act <strong>in</strong> Christ’s stead as His ambassadors<br />

here enunciated is so fundamental to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>ran<br />

Confessions that <strong>Chemnitz</strong> <strong>in</strong> his dialogue with <strong>the</strong> Papists<br />

on Penance wants to make it clear that his <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> no way holds<br />

to a conditional absolution so that noth<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>of</strong>fered and imparted <strong>in</strong><br />

absolution but only calls attention to someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y already had. He<br />

disavows such a viewpo<strong>in</strong>t:<br />

For among <strong>the</strong> Sacramentarians some contend that s<strong>in</strong>s are not<br />

remitted through absolution, s<strong>in</strong>ce men are not able to remit s<strong>in</strong>s — a<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g which belongs only to God, <strong>The</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y contend that believers<br />

receive noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> absolution, but that it is only an outward declaration<br />

<strong>of</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y already had before, However, God, who alone remits<br />

s<strong>in</strong>s, does not do this without means but through <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Word and sacraments. Now private absolution proclaims <strong>the</strong> message<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel through which God is without doubt efficacious and<br />

remits s<strong>in</strong>s to those who by faith lay hold <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> message <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel<br />

<strong>in</strong> absolution. <strong>The</strong>refore <strong>in</strong> absolution God himself remits s<strong>in</strong>s through

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!