The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
0 | <strong>The</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong><br />
was <strong>in</strong> heaven even while He was still walk<strong>in</strong>g on earth, as John 3 [:13]<br />
says” (LW 37, 232).<br />
97 At times Jesus Christ, true God and Man <strong>in</strong> one person, employed<br />
<strong>the</strong> circumscriptive mode, “<strong>the</strong> comprehensible, corporeal mode,” as<br />
when He walked bodily on earth and as He will do on <strong>the</strong> Last Day<br />
(SD VII, 99; LW 37, 222).<br />
98 <strong>The</strong> second, or def<strong>in</strong>itive mode (SD VII, 100), is described by Lu<strong>the</strong>r<br />
(LW 37, 215 and 222 f.). <strong>The</strong> space is really material and circumscribed,<br />
with its own dimensions (LW 37, 215), but Christ’s mode is<br />
an “uncircumscribed, spiritual mode <strong>of</strong> presence accord<strong>in</strong>g to which<br />
He nei<strong>the</strong>r occupies nor yields space but passes through everyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
created as He wills” (LW 37,222). “<strong>The</strong> space is really material and<br />
circumscribed, and has its own dimensions <strong>of</strong> length, breadth, and<br />
depth; but that which occupies it has not <strong>the</strong> same length, breadth,<br />
or depth as <strong>the</strong> space which it occupies, <strong>in</strong>deed, it has no length or<br />
breadth at all” (LW 37, 215). Some examples <strong>of</strong> this are represented<br />
by Christ’s emerg<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> grave, go<strong>in</strong>g through locked doors, and<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bread and w<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
99 With respect to this second mode <strong>of</strong> presence, <strong>the</strong> authors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Formula were afraid that some Sacramentarians might read a wrong<br />
idea <strong>in</strong>to Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term “spiritual mode.” This fear resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
a clarify<strong>in</strong>g addition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al revision (<strong>the</strong> Bergic Book, 1577). Here<br />
<strong>the</strong> authors added SD VII, 104 and 105, where it is spelled out that<br />
<strong>the</strong>y had <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d a spiritual, heavenly mode by which His body and<br />
blood are present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Supper</strong> for believers and unbelievers alike. Of<br />
course, He is not present accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> first, circumscriptive mode,<br />
and it is totally wrong for <strong>the</strong> Sacramentarians here to ascribe to <strong>the</strong><br />
Lu<strong>the</strong>rans “<strong>the</strong> Capernaitic conception <strong>of</strong> a gross, carnal presence.”<br />
100 <strong>The</strong> third mode is called “repletive” (Eph. 4:10). S<strong>in</strong>ce Christ is one<br />
person with God, He also has <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e heavenly mode (SD VII, 101).<br />
This is far beyond th<strong>in</strong>gs created, for “you must place this existence <strong>of</strong><br />
Christ which constitutes Him one person with God, far, far beyond<br />
th<strong>in</strong>gs created,” etc. (LW 37, 223). He is simultaneously present <strong>in</strong> all<br />
places, whole and entire, and fills all places, yet without be<strong>in</strong>g measured<br />
or circumscribed by any place; see Jer. 23:23 (LW 37, 216). 19<br />
101 Before enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>Chemnitz</strong>’s presentation <strong>of</strong> this doctr<strong>in</strong>e, it<br />
would be well to summarize <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts which Lu<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> Formula<br />
have made: