30.11.2012 Views

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Consecration |<br />

184 It is fur<strong>the</strong>r evident that Bugenhagen, just as Lu<strong>the</strong>r does <strong>in</strong> <strong>The</strong><br />

Great Confession, <strong>in</strong>terprets <strong>the</strong> “This do” (1 Cor. 11:24, 25) as a command-word<br />

which embraces <strong>the</strong> deed-words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution so<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Christians are bound by <strong>the</strong> command <strong>of</strong> Christ to say<br />

<strong>the</strong>se words <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> name and person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Savior, and thus are certa<strong>in</strong><br />

that <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> very body and blood <strong>of</strong> Christ (LW 37, 181 f.).<br />

Bugenhagen writes:<br />

Exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution <strong>of</strong> Christ which says, This my bread is my<br />

body; this my cup is my blood, etc. How do we have all this? Through<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution <strong>of</strong> Christ. He Himself thus <strong>in</strong>stituted, orda<strong>in</strong>ed, and<br />

desired it. Christians embrace this <strong>in</strong>stitution and give thanks [to Him].<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore it would be folly to omit <strong>the</strong>se words <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution, and a s<strong>in</strong><br />

not to trust <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. For without <strong>the</strong>se [words], I ask, what would we<br />

look for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bread and <strong>the</strong> cup?<br />

<strong>The</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong> our church publicly recites <strong>the</strong>se words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sacred<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitution over <strong>the</strong> bread and <strong>the</strong> cup which have been placed upon<br />

<strong>the</strong> altar, without any breath<strong>in</strong>g (as <strong>the</strong>y mock<strong>in</strong>gly charge us), s<strong>in</strong>ce he<br />

knows that here noth<strong>in</strong>g can take place through his own power but that<br />

all takes place by <strong>the</strong> power and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution <strong>of</strong> Christ. And he recites<br />

[<strong>the</strong> Words <strong>of</strong> Institution] so that those who are to commune know<br />

how to conduct <strong>the</strong>mselves with regard to this sacrament and what to<br />

believe. Aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Sacramentarians this <strong>in</strong>stitution replies that it is<br />

perpetual for us and that <strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> Christ, which is effective, will<br />

endure to <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world; that <strong>the</strong>re is for us who eat and dr<strong>in</strong>k<br />

<strong>the</strong> body and blood <strong>of</strong> Christ. He does not demand or command that<br />

we make <strong>the</strong> body and blood <strong>of</strong> Christ. That is given to us; with grateful<br />

heart and with rejoic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this act we accept it. We do not presume to<br />

make [<strong>the</strong> body and blood] because Christ does not command it, and<br />

we are unable to do it. For He says, This is my body, this is my blood. He<br />

does not say, Make my body, make my blood. He does not desire makers<br />

<strong>of</strong> His body and blood but communicants, that is, that we eat <strong>the</strong> body<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord and dr<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong> blood <strong>in</strong> His remembrance, which body and<br />

blood He has given through His <strong>in</strong>stitution; <strong>the</strong>se we do not make for<br />

ourselves (HS 127 f.). 49<br />

185 Several po<strong>in</strong>ts emerge from Bugenhagen’s somewhat emotional<br />

explanation:<br />

1. Christ’s command,“Do this,” <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> consecration, <strong>the</strong> distribution<br />

and <strong>the</strong> reception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body and blood <strong>of</strong> Christ.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> command <strong>of</strong> Christ is specific that <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ister speak <strong>the</strong> Words<br />

<strong>of</strong> Institution over <strong>the</strong> elements on <strong>the</strong> altar prepared for <strong>the</strong> Lord’s<br />

<strong>Supper</strong>.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficiant acts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> stead and on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Savior when He<br />

consecrates <strong>the</strong> elements, because <strong>the</strong> Savior has so <strong>in</strong>stituted and<br />

commanded it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!