The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> Consecration | 0<br />
by an endur<strong>in</strong>g union is and rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bread <strong>in</strong> no o<strong>the</strong>r way<br />
than He is present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> true use, and that, over and above and apart<br />
from this use, which has <strong>the</strong> testimony and commandment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution,<br />
it is permissible to handle <strong>the</strong> eucharist <strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r way and<br />
for a different use, namely, through sacrifice, reservation, carry<strong>in</strong>g it<br />
about, display<strong>in</strong>g it, and all that is connected with <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs” (Ex.<br />
2, 250; emphasis added).<br />
240 To get <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemnitz</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>dictment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roman<br />
Church, one must keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d his precise def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> “use” and<br />
“action” <strong>in</strong> speak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong> (see p. 11 f.). It means to consecrate<br />
<strong>the</strong> elements, distribute <strong>the</strong>m, and eat and dr<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong>m (SD<br />
VII, 84–86; see p. 13 f.). Here Trent’s error is to teach that <strong>the</strong> Roman<br />
consecration effects “an endur<strong>in</strong>g union” (Ex. 2, 249).<br />
241 Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>Chemnitz</strong> charges <strong>the</strong> Roman Church with <strong>in</strong>vent<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
defend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion that “bless<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> Words <strong>of</strong> Christ is not<br />
effective and that it is not a true sacrament even though <strong>the</strong> Word <strong>of</strong><br />
Christ comes to <strong>the</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> bread and w<strong>in</strong>e, unless <strong>the</strong> consecration<br />
takes place <strong>in</strong> a church or at an altar which has been pontifically<br />
consecrated, Thus <strong>the</strong> genu<strong>in</strong>eness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eucharist is judged to depend<br />
not so much on <strong>the</strong> Words <strong>of</strong> Christ as on <strong>the</strong> place” (Ex. 2, 310 f.).<br />
242 After marshal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> evidence for both positions, <strong>the</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>ran<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Roman, <strong>Chemnitz</strong> exclaims, “<strong>The</strong>refore let a comparison<br />
be made!” (Ex. 2, 680), He has shown that <strong>the</strong> Papists “establish as<br />
<strong>the</strong> essence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir priesthood <strong>the</strong> sacrifice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body and blood <strong>of</strong><br />
Christ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mass, which was brought <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> church without, yes,<br />
contrary to Scripture” (Ex. 2, 680).<br />
243 <strong>The</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>ran position is that <strong>the</strong> Lord committed <strong>the</strong> “outward<br />
m<strong>in</strong>istry unto men.” But to make <strong>the</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>ran position on <strong>the</strong> public<br />
m<strong>in</strong>istry clear, <strong>Chemnitz</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ues:<br />
Never<strong>the</strong>less not everyone ought to take and arrogate to himself<br />
<strong>the</strong> public m<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Word and Sacrament. . . . Paul prescribes a<br />
legitimate manner <strong>of</strong> call<strong>in</strong>g which is made through <strong>the</strong> voice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
church. . . . <strong>The</strong>re is added also <strong>the</strong> promise that God will truly work<br />
effectively through <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> those who teach <strong>the</strong> Gospel which<br />
<strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> God wills to preserve <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> church through perpetual call<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
as St. Paul says <strong>in</strong> Ephesians 4:8 ff . . . . Through this m<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>the</strong>re are<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered to us eternal bless<strong>in</strong>gs, and <strong>in</strong>deed . . . God <strong>in</strong> this way receives<br />
us, rescues us from s<strong>in</strong> and <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> devil and from eternal<br />
death, and restores to us righteousness and eternal life, (Ex, 2, 678).