30.11.2012 Views

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Apology, <strong>the</strong> Small and Large Catechisms, <strong>the</strong> Smalcald Articles and <strong>the</strong><br />

Tractate, and with a flood <strong>of</strong> patristic evidence to show that here was no new<br />

doctr<strong>in</strong>e, but a “we believe, teach and confess” to <strong>the</strong> faith once delivered to<br />

<strong>the</strong> one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church, which <strong>the</strong> Lord creates and<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>s by <strong>the</strong> gifts he gives through his Means <strong>of</strong> Grace.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Concord’s confession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord’s Law and Gospel is so<br />

destructive <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world’s religions that it is ever under attack both blatant<br />

and subtle, with <strong>the</strong> latter ever <strong>the</strong> more s<strong>in</strong>ister. Does it have to be so clear<br />

and blunt? Is that what <strong>the</strong> Lord really said? No chance for any synergism?<br />

Bluntness as pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> faithfulness was not <strong>the</strong> way <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemnitz</strong>. <strong>Bjarne</strong><br />

Teigen remarks “his faculty for present<strong>in</strong>g with objectivity not only <strong>the</strong><br />

content <strong>of</strong> Sacred Scriptures but also <strong>the</strong> views <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ologians, friendly and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise” and eager to recognize “a number <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>gs not <strong>in</strong> controversy.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se I will<strong>in</strong>gly concede” (ix).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Formula first confesses <strong>the</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong>, and <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> Lord whom<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong> confesses, Articles 7 and 8: a sacramental Christology.<br />

Of what use is a salvation achieved for us, if it is not delivered to us? <strong>The</strong><br />

salvation, achieved by <strong>the</strong> vicarious aton<strong>in</strong>g sacrifice <strong>of</strong> his body and blood,<br />

is given us as <strong>the</strong> Lord gives <strong>in</strong>to our mouths his body and blood to eat and<br />

to dr<strong>in</strong>k, as he says. <strong>The</strong>re is no o<strong>the</strong>r Savior. “Lu<strong>the</strong>ran <strong>the</strong>ology is sacramental<br />

<strong>the</strong>ology.”<br />

On <strong>the</strong>n to <strong>Chemnitz</strong>: “<strong>The</strong>re and back aga<strong>in</strong>.”<br />

Note concern<strong>in</strong>g electronic publication: This electronic edition <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Lord’s<br />

<strong>Supper</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>The</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> Mart<strong>in</strong> <strong>Chemnitz</strong> is not a photographic reproduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t edition. <strong>The</strong> text has been scanned, manipulated and reformatted.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> pag<strong>in</strong>ation differs from that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t edition, <strong>the</strong><br />

paragraph number<strong>in</strong>g is identical to <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al. <strong>The</strong> entries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

are l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>the</strong>ir paragraphs. <strong>The</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t edition had all endnotes at <strong>the</strong> end<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last chapter. This edition has moved <strong>the</strong> notes for each chapter to <strong>the</strong><br />

end <strong>of</strong> that chapter. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is reproduced from <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t edition. We<br />

have reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>of</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g references to <strong>the</strong><br />

text by paragraph number. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> paragraph numbers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> edition are<br />

identical <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>dex is accurate. Citations based on <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al text<br />

will be identical to citations to this text.<br />

This electronic reproduction is made available for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals and<br />

may be reproduced for private use. Any re-publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text, for pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

or o<strong>the</strong>rwise is prohibited.<br />

Erl<strong>in</strong>g T. Teigen<br />

xii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!