The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Sacramental Eat<strong>in</strong>g |<br />
[Paul] jo<strong>in</strong>s it to <strong>the</strong> account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution” (LS 127). Paul specifically<br />
says “This bread,” “or <strong>the</strong> bread <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> God says:<br />
‘This is my body.’ In <strong>the</strong> same way he speaks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cup <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong><br />
Lord Himself states: ‘This is my blood which is <strong>the</strong> blood <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New<br />
Covenant.’” Hence “Paul understands <strong>the</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g and dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />
literal sense” (LS 128).<br />
382 <strong>Chemnitz</strong> expla<strong>in</strong>s, “To eat unworthily means not to eat <strong>in</strong> such a<br />
way as is fitt<strong>in</strong>g for this <strong>Supper</strong> or as is worthy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> food which is<br />
distributed and received <strong>in</strong> this <strong>Supper</strong>” (LS 128). He <strong>the</strong>n ga<strong>the</strong>rs<br />
from <strong>the</strong> wider context that Paul is charg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>thians with <strong>the</strong><br />
fact that “<strong>the</strong>y were not com<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong> with any o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
spirit or <strong>in</strong> any greater reverence than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir private homes when<br />
<strong>the</strong>y sat down to <strong>the</strong>ir own ord<strong>in</strong>ary meals” (LS 128). It is evident that<br />
<strong>the</strong>y were com<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> table <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord “without true repentance<br />
and faith” for <strong>the</strong>y were “nourish<strong>in</strong>g hatred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir hearts; <strong>the</strong>y were<br />
despis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> church, were sham<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> poor and were not absta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
from idolatrous practices; <strong>the</strong>y were even com<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> celebration <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Supper</strong> drunk” (LS 128).<br />
383 With <strong>the</strong>ir use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong> <strong>in</strong> such frivolous security<br />
and worldly <strong>in</strong>difference <strong>the</strong>y were eat<strong>in</strong>g and dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g judgment to<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves, “<strong>The</strong>refore, because <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong> he eats unworthily,<br />
he eats judgment to himself. This is <strong>the</strong> punishment” (LS 129).<br />
“But,” asks <strong>Chemnitz</strong>, “what th<strong>in</strong>g has he violated to br<strong>in</strong>g this penalty<br />
upon himself?” He has used <strong>the</strong> sacrament without consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />
what it really is: <strong>the</strong> sacrament <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> very body and blood <strong>of</strong> Christ.<br />
“As a result those who eat unworthily <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Supper</strong> eat to <strong>the</strong>ir judgment<br />
because by <strong>the</strong>ir misuse and pr<strong>of</strong>anation <strong>the</strong>y <strong>in</strong>flict <strong>in</strong>jury and<br />
<strong>in</strong>sult not only on <strong>the</strong> external symbols but upon <strong>the</strong> very body and<br />
blood <strong>of</strong> Christ” (LS 129).<br />
384 This situation is paradoxical, “Paul is describ<strong>in</strong>g a particular and<br />
peculiar mode <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>anation and violation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> Christ,”<br />
because <strong>the</strong> judgment comes by eat<strong>in</strong>g and not by reject<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sacrament,<br />
“<strong>The</strong>refore <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Supper</strong> judgment is <strong>in</strong>curred not by reject<strong>in</strong>g<br />
but by eat<strong>in</strong>g, for he [Paul] says: ‘he eats judgment to himself ’” (LS<br />
130). Hence “<strong>the</strong> unworthy partake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> Christ but not to<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir salvation” (LS 171). This must be so because “<strong>the</strong> genu<strong>in</strong>eness<br />
and <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sacrament does not depend on <strong>the</strong> worth<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
or unworth<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r those who distribute or those who receive,