30.11.2012 Views

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

| <strong>The</strong> Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong><br />

peculiar mode <strong>of</strong> presence and grace <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> action <strong>of</strong> His <strong>Supper</strong>, so that<br />

He truly and substantially imparts His body and blood to those who<br />

eat, . . . if, I say, we truly and from <strong>the</strong> heart believe <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs, it nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

can nor should happen that faith would fail to venerate and worship<br />

Christ who is present <strong>in</strong> this action” (Ex 2, 277; emphasis added).<br />

Here it is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> utmost importance to remember <strong>Chemnitz</strong>’s “precis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition” <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term “action” with respect to his use <strong>of</strong> it <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Lord’s <strong>Supper</strong> (see p. 13 f.).<br />

108 It is now necessary to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> fifth k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> presence to which<br />

<strong>Chemnitz</strong> makes reference, “He has all creatures present with him<br />

en logoo” (TNC 449; see endnote #20). This would be identical with<br />

<strong>the</strong> repletive mode, “accord<strong>in</strong>g to which all creatures are <strong>in</strong>deed much<br />

more penetrable and present to him than <strong>the</strong>y are accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

second mode.” This must be so because Christ is “one person with<br />

God” (SD VII, 101). <strong>The</strong> Formula anchors this conviction even more<br />

firmly <strong>in</strong> Article VIII, employ<strong>in</strong>g part <strong>of</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s Great Confession,<br />

“S<strong>in</strong>ce He is a man like this — and apart from this man <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />

God — it must follow that accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> third supernatural manner,<br />

He is and can be everywhere that God is and that everyth<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

full <strong>of</strong> Christ through and through, also accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> humanity<br />

— not, <strong>of</strong> course, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> first, corporeal, comprehensible<br />

manner, but accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> supernatural, div<strong>in</strong>e manner. Here you<br />

must take your stand and say that wherever Christ is accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> deity, He is <strong>the</strong>re as a natural, div<strong>in</strong>e person and also naturally<br />

and personally <strong>the</strong>re as His conception <strong>in</strong> His mo<strong>the</strong>r’s womb proves<br />

conclusively” (SD VIII, 81 f.; LW 37, 218).<br />

109 This is precisely <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemnitz</strong>. In devot<strong>in</strong>g a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

chapter to <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Personal Union, he says that<br />

this <strong>in</strong>timate unit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assum<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> assumed natures br<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

about <strong>the</strong> fact that although as a result <strong>of</strong> this union noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> itself is<br />

added to or subtracted from <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e nature, yet <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> human nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> Christ, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> union, <strong>the</strong>re are not only natural attributes<br />

which result from <strong>the</strong> constitution <strong>of</strong> human nature, nor are <strong>the</strong>re only<br />

particular and f<strong>in</strong>ite which <strong>in</strong>here formally <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> humanity and are more<br />

numerous and more excellent <strong>in</strong> degree than those which come from<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dwell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sa<strong>in</strong>ts, but also because <strong>of</strong> this<br />

union <strong>the</strong> human nature <strong>in</strong> Christ not only has <strong>the</strong> fulness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deity<br />

dwell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> it personally, but at <strong>the</strong> same time, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Scripture,<br />

it receives <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e majesty which has been given and communicated to<br />

it along with <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e power, wisdom, life and o<strong>the</strong>r div<strong>in</strong>e qualities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!