The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz Bjarne - Logia

The Biblical Foundation |
Concord, however, which was the product of several re-writings by
other theologians besides Chemnitz, did contain a rather elaborate
exposition of the Sacrament which employed the Aristotelian terminology
such as that already mentioned (par. 56). When the formulators
of the Formula met in May 1576 at Torgau, they did not accept
this section of over four hundred words into the Torgau Book. 7 This
elaboration on the Aristotelian model was found in the Swabian-Saxon
Concord immediately after what is now SD VII, 90. This explanation
can be correctly understood, although one might infer that the
consecration is conditional so that the Real Presence is not there until
the oral sumption completes the “action” of the Sacrament, the causa
formalis (see p. 91 and note #65).
60 John Warwick Montgomery, on the authority of J. Fritschel, recognized
Chytraeus as one of the chief authors of Article VII of the
Swabian-Saxon Concord. Chytraeus, acting as the secretary of the
Rostock faculty, “preferred to rewrite two articles, the second and the
seventh [i.e., of the document that was finally presented as the Swabian-Saxon
Concord].” 8
61 On March 1, 1577, at the Elector’s request, Andreae, Chemnitz and
Selneccer cloistered themselves at the Bergen Abbey to revise the
Torgau Book, taking into consideration the reactions that the Elector
had received to its circulation in the preceding year. By March 14,
they had completed their work and were ready to report to the Elector.
9 Not only did the Aristotelian elaboration remain excised, but
for good measure the committee eliminated about 1500 more words
following the Aristotelian paradigm. 10 This latter section was devoted
to refuting the standard Sacramentarian objections to the Lutheran
doctrine of the Lord’s Supper, all of which had their origin in the
denial of the communication of attributes resulting from the personal
union of the two natures in Christ. The Bergic Book (the present Formula
of Concord) substitutes for all this what is now SD VII, 91:
All the imaginary reasons and futile counter-arguments of the
Sacramentarians concerning the essential and natural properties of
the human body, concerning the ascension of Christ, concerning His
withdrawal from this world,and the like,have been thoroughly,extensively,
and definitively refuted on the basis of God’s Word by Dr. Luther in his
polemical writings, Against the Heavenly Prophets, That These Words “This
is My Body” Still Stand Firm, his Great and Small Confessions Concerning
the Holy Supper, and other writings of his. The Spiritualists have advanced