12.07.2015 Views

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PIVOT LEGAL SOCIETYthat lately. My only option is to save my money <strong>and</strong> to make sure that I have some forthe year I stay home.- female off-street in-call sex <strong>work</strong>erRecipients of EI have to satisfy a complex set of criteria. For example, when receiving “regularbenefits” during periods of unemployment, an EI recipient must be able to demonstrate that they arewilling <strong>and</strong> able to <strong>work</strong> at all times. They must be able to demonstrate that they are looking activelyfor <strong>work</strong>, <strong>and</strong> maintain a record of their <strong>work</strong> search. Claimants can be disentitled to benefits if theyfail to prove that, on any given <strong>work</strong>ing day, they were capable <strong>and</strong> available for <strong>work</strong> <strong>and</strong> unableto find “suitable employment.” 10 In light of these criteria, would HRSD see prostitution as “suitableemployment,” <strong>and</strong> under what circumstances would it be viewed as such? Depending on the interpretation,HRSD could disqualify a claimant for refusing to look for or accept employment as a sex<strong>work</strong>er. Again, the <strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> legislation deals with this eventuality by providing that a person’srefusal to engage in sex <strong>work</strong> does not affect his or her entitlement to benefits such as EI. The sex<strong>work</strong>ers we talked to agreed that this type of provision should be included in the Canadian EIA.Even if sex <strong>work</strong> is completely decriminalized, Canada’s EI scheme will still exclude specific groupsof sex <strong>work</strong>ers who may need financial support during periods of unemployment. For example, independentcontractors do not have EI deducted from their pay, <strong>and</strong> therefore cannot claim EI benefits.A significant proportion of sex <strong>work</strong>ers are currently categorized as self-employed <strong>work</strong>ers or independentcontractors, <strong>and</strong> will likely continue to be so even if the criminal laws are repealed. Therefore, itis likely that many sex <strong>work</strong>ers will continue to be barred from participating in EI.Part-time <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers who are faced with fluctuating levels of <strong>work</strong> often are alsoexcluded from EI. Many of these <strong>work</strong>ers are ineligible for EI because they do not meet the minimumnumber of hours of insurable employment that is required during the qualifying period to be eligibleto claim EI. Most people will need between 420 <strong>and</strong> 700 insurable hours of <strong>work</strong> during their qualifyingperiod to be eligible, depending on the unemployment rate in their region at the time of filingtheir claim for benefits. 11 These <strong>work</strong>ers can be denied benefits even after having paid into the system.Many sex <strong>work</strong>ers currently <strong>work</strong> part time or experience fluctuating levels of <strong>work</strong> <strong>and</strong>, therefore,could be denied benefits for not having <strong>work</strong>ed an adequate number of hours in the period beforethey became unemployed. <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers will benefit from the EI scheme if it is restructured to allowself-employed <strong>work</strong>ers to pay into the EI program, <strong>and</strong> if part-time <strong>and</strong> other vulnerable <strong>work</strong>ers arenot subject to a requirement that they <strong>work</strong> a minimum number of hours of insurable employment intheir qualifying period.Income Assistance recommendations1. B.C. should enact legislation that is modelled after the <strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> PRA which states that aperson’s entitlement to social assistance may not be cancelled or affected in any other way by his orher refusal to <strong>work</strong>, or to continue to <strong>work</strong>, as a sex <strong>work</strong>er.2. Repeal the EAA two-year employment rule because it creates an unreasonable barrier for individualswho need welfare.3. If the two-year employment rule remains in force, then prostitution should be recognized as“employment” under the two-year employment requirement for income assistance.10 Ibid, s. 18.11 Ibid., s. 55.156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!