12.07.2015 Views

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PIVOT LEGAL SOCIETYSome respondents, including the sex <strong>work</strong>ers quoted below, stated that in order to protect both clients<strong>and</strong> sex <strong>work</strong>ers, commercial sex without a condom should be illegal:A. And a lot of men like to pay extra, for y’know, unsafe sex.A. That . . . should be illegal . . .A. Because if you are a sex trade <strong>work</strong>er, you are having sex with lots of different people,or getting them off or whatever you want to call it.A. Right.A. And so, yeah, you should . . . be responsible <strong>and</strong> you should do your business.Q. So who should be penalized for offering it? Should it be the john, or should it be thegirl for accepting it?A. Both, both, definitely both.- female off-street out-call sex <strong>work</strong>ersMany sex <strong>work</strong>ers felt that disclosure of HIV-positive status was an important prerequisite toconducting business as safely as possible. These views are inconsistent with the recommendations ofthe Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Net<strong>work</strong> (the “Net<strong>work</strong>”), which has argued that criminalizing HIVtransmission or exposure would be counterproductive, <strong>and</strong> would further stigmatize people livingwith HIV/AIDS. The Net<strong>work</strong> argues that the possible benefits of criminalization are outweighed bythe social <strong>and</strong> economic costs of applying criminal sanctions that are less effective than public healthmeasures. The Net<strong>work</strong> noted that, although the use of criminal sanctions might be seen as ‘gettingtough’ in the fight against AIDS, it would have little real impact on transmission rates, may deterpeople with HIV/AIDS from getting tested, <strong>and</strong> would divert attention <strong>and</strong> resources away frommore effective public health initiatives. 31 Given the complexity of this issue <strong>and</strong> the limited time dedicatedto it in this project, further consultation <strong>and</strong> dialogue with sex <strong>work</strong>ers is recommended.Criminal law recommendations1. Repeal s. 210, 211, 212(1) <strong>and</strong> 212(3) <strong>and</strong> 213 as set out in Pivot’s 2004 report, Voices forDignity. 322. Provide education to police <strong>and</strong> improve police accountability so that sex <strong>work</strong>ers receive equalprotection when they are victims of crime.3. Ensure more proactive enforcement of criminal assault laws by police <strong>and</strong> Crown prosecutors inorder to protect sex <strong>work</strong>ers from violence.4. Educate sex <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> employers about the potential for assault laws to be used to protect sex<strong>work</strong>ers who are coerced or forced to engage in sex with an employer or prospective employer.5. Educate sex <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> employers about the rights of sex <strong>work</strong>ers to determine what services theyprovide <strong>and</strong> to whom.6. Educate employers about the Criminal Code interpretation of consent to sexual activity <strong>and</strong> how itaffects an employer’s expectation of the duties performed by sex-<strong>work</strong>er employees.7. Do not criminalize youth who are involved in the sex industry.31 “Criminalization: Does It Make Sense?” (March 1999), online: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Net<strong>work</strong> .R. Elliott, “Criminal Law <strong>and</strong> HIV/AIDS: Final Report” (1997), online: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Net<strong>work</strong> & Canadian AIDSSociety .32 Voices for Dignity, supra note 5.220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!