12.07.2015 Views

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BEYOND DECRIMINALIZATION: <strong>Sex</strong> Work, <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>and</strong> a <strong>New</strong> Frame<strong>work</strong> for Law Reformin investigating assaults on sex <strong>work</strong>ers; many sex <strong>work</strong>ers receive subst<strong>and</strong>ard treatment by police. Itappears likely that the criminalization of many aspects of prostitution contributes to under-enforcementwhen sex <strong>work</strong>ers are the victims, as those who report assaults can be subject to discriminatorytreatment by police <strong>and</strong>, in some cases, treated as a criminal rather than as a victim of crime.One issue raised by several sex <strong>work</strong>ers is the potential for the current assault laws to protect themfrom being forced to engage in sex with an employer or prospective employer in order to secure ormaintain a position in an escort agency or massage parlour. A massage parlour <strong>work</strong>er described thisalarming <strong>and</strong> common job requirement:A. No, I tell you something. This is pretty disgusting, but this is happens to every singleone. I mean every massage parlour that have it. I am pretty certain, hundred percentsure. ‘Cause I have been some like you know three different massage parlours. I didnot really <strong>work</strong> for the first one. What happens is the first thing when you go forinterview . . . And they will ask you do you know how to do massage. They will wantyou to get into the room. And like you know they will asking you to wear dress, skirtusually. What happens is they say, you know, I am the test. And the test is you haveto have sex with the guy [the owner], with the manager. Usually, what happens issome of them, they have managers. They say manager but I think that’s just a pimp.Usually we call them dealers because they do not treat the girl as a person. They justcalled dealers. Doing the deal.- female off-street in-call sex <strong>work</strong>erAnother former <strong>work</strong>er <strong>and</strong> current massage parlour owner described a similar situation:A. The type of stuff that takes people over the edge – is the type of the stuff that happenedin [massage parlour] where you’re, y’know, where you have to let the owner goperform oral sex on you on a regular basis, to hold your job.- female massage parlour owner, former sex <strong>work</strong>er<strong>Sex</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers expressed a need for protection in cases where they are coerced into engaging in sexual activitieswith an employer in order to keep a job, or if they feel they are forced to provide particular sexual servicesto a client. This issue is looked at in more detail in the following discussion of sexual assault.<strong>Sex</strong>ual assaultThe term “sexual assault” is not defined in the Criminal Code, but case law has determined that itmeans any non-consensual touching of a sexual nature. &10 In other words, any assault that is sexual innature is a sexual assault.Consent – general considerationsSection 265(3) of the Criminal Code states that consent is not obtained if a person submits or doesnot resist by reason of actual or threatened application of force, fraud, or the exercise of authority.Consequently, the law offers protection to those who are intimidated into “consenting” to unwantedsexual contact. Therefore, one issue that arises is whether the law of assault would apply to protect sex<strong>work</strong>ers who are compelled to engage in sex with an employer or prospective employer in order tosecure a position at an escort agency or massage parlour.For such a prosecution to succeed, the court would have to decide that the economic power ofan employer amounts to an “exercise of authority” within the meaning of s. 265(3) of the Criminal Voices for Dignity, supra note 5. Criminal Code, s. 271.10 R. v. Ewanchuk (1999), 22 C.R. (5th) 1, 131 C.C.C. (3d) 481 (S.C.C.).215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!