12.07.2015 Views

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PIVOT LEGAL SOCIETYPrivacyA. [C]ertainly a massage parlour is the safest place to <strong>work</strong> because there’s safety innumbers. Given that though, I think people should have the choice to beself-employed <strong>and</strong> assess that risk on their own . . . no one . . . needs that paternalistic,‘this is safer for you’ approach <strong>and</strong> be told where or how to <strong>work</strong>.A. I mean, realistically, some people are still going to go outside, no matter what.- female off-street in-call sex <strong>work</strong>erA. Well, maybe it could be that there would be sort of a Low Track area where the druggies<strong>and</strong> all that hang out <strong>and</strong> I don’t know . . . the only thing that maybe, if therewere a closed radius to some dumpy, cheap hotels they could <strong>work</strong> out of there <strong>and</strong>their friends could watch out for them.- female off-street out-call sex <strong>work</strong>erA. That shouldn’t mean that if you’re in that kind of [sex <strong>work</strong>] business you have to bein that [one] zone, because you know it would be ridiculous, if say there was a[sex<strong>work</strong>] zone like that in Gastown for instance <strong>and</strong> someone wanted to get laid inBurnaby or Coquitlam, they’re [the client is] not necessarily going to want to come allthat way to perform a sort of a domestic kind of transaction. And so yeah, you couldhave a zone that is geared for that but that couldn’t be the only zone or you’d have tohave other zones all over the place.- female off-street in-call sex <strong>work</strong>erGenerally sex <strong>work</strong>ers emphasized the need for privacy for <strong>work</strong>ers, clients <strong>and</strong> the industry as awhole. Some sex <strong>work</strong>ers stated that they felt a zone for prostitution would make them more visible,which could make them susceptible to stigmatization <strong>and</strong> discrimination. Both escorts <strong>and</strong> femalestreet sex <strong>work</strong>ers emphasized the need for privacy:A. Once you start zoning <strong>and</strong> say “you can only operate in this area”, what happensis then…like you’ve really labelled people <strong>and</strong>, I don’t know, I think you’ll drive itfurther underground. Some people will st<strong>and</strong> up <strong>and</strong> say, “yeah, I’m gonna <strong>work</strong> inthis area”, but then I don’t know . . . . Nobody really wants to st<strong>and</strong> up <strong>and</strong> say “I’ma sex-trade <strong>work</strong>er”. I don’t know a lot of people who would want to admit it, youknow?female street-level sex <strong>work</strong>erA. I was very discreet about it. I mean, the thing is, if you let people know what you do,then you’re opening yourself up to eggs being thrown at you, or whatever the heck,people screeching at you, who knows, maybe people trying to make you move out ofyour home or at least making you feel so uncomfortable that you move out on yourown volition. So, it really pays not to tell people what you do.- female off-street out-call sex <strong>work</strong>erA. I think that it would successfully operate invisibly if there’s not an area because therecould be very small houses with just one or a few <strong>work</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> like you said peoplecould come <strong>and</strong> go unnoticed, if you like, whereas if it’s all ghettoized into a certainred light district then people are you know . . . you’re only there for one reason. Youlose privacy.- female off-street out-call sex <strong>work</strong>er76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!