12.07.2015 Views

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

Beyond Decriminalization: Sex-work, Human Rights and a New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PIVOT LEGAL SOCIETY88other profession that, when you go in to be a secretary, you have to give your boss ablow-job. You know, that is a form of harassment. You know . . . <strong>and</strong> it’s no differentfrom escort to massage <strong>and</strong> so forth . . . it’s all the same. And I don’t think that’s evergoing to change.- female off-street out-call sex <strong>work</strong>erAnother sex <strong>work</strong>er described having a similar experience:A. No, I tell you something. This is pretty disgusting, but this is happens to every singleone. I mean every massage parlour that have it. I am pretty certain, hundred percentsure. ‘Cause I have been some like you know three different massage parlours. I didnot really <strong>work</strong> for the first one. What happens is the first thing when you go forinterview . . . . And they will ask you do you know how to do massage? They willwant you to get into the room. And like you know they will asking you to wear dress,skirt usually. What happens is they say, you know I am the test. And the test is youhave to have sex with the guy [the owner] . . . . With the manager. Usually, whathappens is some of them, they have managers. They say manager but I think that’sjust a pimp. Usually we call them dealers because they do not treat the girl as aperson. They just called dealers. Doing the deal.Q. Right. So they make you have sex with the dealer?A. That’s right. Because like some bigger massage parlours they have two dealers. Theyput them A or B. You know what I mean?Q. And with the dealer or with the owner that you have to have sex with, do you use acondom with them?A. Well, usually yes if you know. Because before I go, [name omitted] gave me tips. Youcan ask for it, but if you do not ask for it, they make you do it without a condom.- female off-street in-call sex <strong>work</strong>erThe requirement that job applicants have sex with the business owner or manager as part of the hiringprocess could lead to criminal charges against the employer/manager. They could be charged withsexual assault on the grounds that consent was obtained by an abuse of their position of authority. 12Such conduct could also be prosecuted as extortion under the Criminal Code if a court accepted theargument that there was a “threat not to hire” if the <strong>work</strong>er did not consent. 13The data gathered from this group of sex <strong>work</strong>ers reinforces the importance of the protectionsprovided in the ESA for job applicants. The existing ESA provision relating to full <strong>and</strong> honest disclosureabout the nature of the employment is important for sex <strong>work</strong>ers who need to be clear aboutthe nature of the establishment <strong>and</strong> the expectations once they are on the job. Also these interviewssuggest that people involved in the sex industry need a much better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of criminal sexualassault laws. Both employers <strong>and</strong> <strong>work</strong>ers must be educated to underst<strong>and</strong> that requiring job applicantsto have sex with a manager or owner as a condition of hiring is a criminal offence. Police shouldbe educated about the existence of such practices <strong>and</strong> be given the m<strong>and</strong>ate to provide the sameprotection to sex <strong>work</strong>ers as other victims of sexual assault.Age of <strong>work</strong>ersMany sex <strong>work</strong>ers expressed concern about the involvement of children <strong>and</strong> youth in prostitution.For example, the following project participant described her concern that if sex <strong>work</strong> becomesmore socially acceptable, it may have the unintended consequence of making it more acceptable forchildren <strong>and</strong> youth to be involved.12 CCC, supra note 1, s. 273.1(2)(c).13 See R. v. Davis, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 759, 179 D.L.R. (4th) 385.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!