12.07.2015 Views

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

126 P. TompaThe final functional category of IDPs is that of prions, not included in previousclassification schemes (Tompa 2002, 2005). Prions have been traditionally consideredas pathogens, mostly because of their causal association <strong>with</strong> “mad cow diseases”(Prusiner 1998). In a recent surge of papers, however, it has been shown thatthe au<strong>to</strong>catalytic conformational change underlying the prion phenomenon alsooccurs in the normal physiological functions of proteins of yeast (Tuite andKoloteva-Levin 2004), or even higher organisms, such as D. melanogaster (Si et al.2003a, b; Fowler et al. 2007). These prion proteins have disordered Q/N-rich priondomains (Pierce et al. 2005), primarily responsible for the au<strong>to</strong>catalytic conformationaltransition that has functional consequences on neighbouring domains.5.4.3 <strong>Function</strong>-Related Structural Elements in IDPsA special feature of the recognition functions of IDPs, that their transient structuralelements are involved in molecular recognition, is directly pertinent <strong>to</strong> predictingfunction from sequence. The presence of such elements, often discernible at thelevel of both sequence and structure, may be used in predicting function. Orderedproteins evolved a great variety of domains <strong>to</strong> contribute specialized recognitionfunctions (Pawson and Nash 2003; Seet et al. 2006), whereas their cognate partners,such as those of the SH3 domain (Hiroaki et al. 2001; Ferreon and Hilser 2004),14-3-3 domain (Bus<strong>to</strong> and Iglesias 2006) or PTB domain (Obenauer et al. 2003),tend <strong>to</strong> be short motifs <strong>with</strong>in flexible regions of proteins. There are several differentbut interconnected concepts involving such short motifs, emphasizing structuralor sequential aspects of their implication in function.5.4.3.1 Preformed Structural ElementsThe concept of preformed structural elements (PSEs) has arisen from the analysisof structures of IDPs in complex <strong>with</strong> their partners. The key question addressedwas if the local structure of an IDP in complex <strong>with</strong> its partner could bepredicted by secondary structure prediction algorithms (Fuxreiter et al. 2004).It was found that the accuracy of predicting these IDP secondary structuralelements is higher than that of predictions for their ordered partner proteins,which suggests that IDPs have a strong conformational preference for the conformationsattained in their bound states, i.e. they probably use elements forrecognition that are (partially) pre-formed in the solution state. This relation isstrongest for helices and is weakest for coils, and it has been corroborated bysolution NMR studies of several unbound IDPs, which sample a local structuresimilar <strong>to</strong> the bound state. Examples of such IDPs include the KID domain ofCREB (Radhakrishnan et al. 1998), the KID domain of Cdk inhibi<strong>to</strong>r p27Kip2(Kriwacki et al. 1996; Lacy et al. 2004), and the trans-activa<strong>to</strong>r domain of tumorsuppressor p53 (Lee et al. 2000).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!