12.07.2015 Views

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prefaceviiof multiple methods <strong>with</strong>in integrated servers. This is more convenient for the userand also allows for determination of consensus predictions. Chapter 10 describesthe resources and operation of ProFunc and ProKnow which work in this way.Chapter 11 discusses published work in which structure-based methods wereapplied <strong>to</strong> predict functions for Structural Genomics outputs. This results in a valuablepicture of which methods typically prove most informative. The chapter concludes<strong>with</strong> a discussion of recent moves <strong>to</strong>wards community annotation as a way <strong>to</strong> tacklethe bottleneck in annotation of Structural Genomics results. Chapter 12 coversapplications of structure-based methods <strong>to</strong> model structures, derived by both comparativeand ab initio techniques. As well as a broad range of examples, publishedwork assessing the accuracy of model structures in function-relevant aspects andthe applicability of various methods <strong>to</strong> model structures is discussed.This book is designed <strong>to</strong> provide an up-<strong>to</strong>-date impression of the state-of-the-artin protein structure prediction and structure-based function prediction. Each methodschapter contains links <strong>to</strong> available servers and other resources which the readermay wish <strong>to</strong> apply <strong>to</strong> his or her protein. At the end of each chapter, authors pick outfuture directions and challenges in their respective areas. I hope the reader gains anaccurate impression of the impressive pace of research in these areas. Even whilethis book was being finalised, significant progress in a longstanding problem area– refinement of comparative models – was reported (Jagielska et al. 2008).Nevertheless, it seems that protein structures continually present new challenges <strong>to</strong>be met. Just as we may feel that the community is getting <strong>to</strong> grips <strong>with</strong> domainswapping, circular permutation, fibril formation and intrinsically disordered proteins,<strong>to</strong> name but a few previously unexpected phenomena, we are presented <strong>with</strong>metamorphic proteins (Murzin 2008) which may carry profound implications forour understanding of protein fold space. Will bioinformatics methods ever be able<strong>to</strong> predict which proteins can morph from one fold <strong>to</strong> another? That remains uncertain,but clearly the bioinformatics of protein structure-function will remain anexciting research area for many years <strong>to</strong> come.ReferencesJagielska A, Wroblewska L, Skolnick J (2008) <strong>Protein</strong> model refinement using an optimized physicsbasedall-a<strong>to</strong>m force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:8268–8273Lesk AM (1997) CASP2: report on ab initio predictions. <strong>Protein</strong>s Suppl 1:151–166Murzin AG (2008) Metamorphic proteins. Science 320:1725–1726

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!