From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

5 Structure and Function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins 139Romero P, Obradovic Z, Li X, et al. (2001) Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins42:38–48Ross ED, Edskes HK, Terry MJ, et al. (2005) Primary sequence independence for prion formation.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:12825–12830Schlessinger A, Punta M, Rost B (2007) Natively unstructured regions in proteins identified fromcontact predictions. Bioinformatics 23:2376–2384Schweers O, Schonbrunn-Hanebeck E, Marx A, et al. (1994) Structural studies of tau protein andAlzheimer paired helical filaments show no evidence for beta-structure. J Biol Chem269:24290–24297.Seet BT, Dikic I, Zhou MM, et al. (2006) Reading protein modifications with interaction domains.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:473–483Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423,623–656Si K, Giustetto M, Etkin A, et al. (2003a) A neuronal isoform of CPEB regulates local proteinsynthesis and stabilizes synapse-specific long-term facilitation in aplysia. Cell 115:893–904Si K, Lindquist S, Kandel ER (2003b) A neuronal isoform of the aplysia CPEB has prion-likeproperties. Cell 115:879–891Sickmeier M, Hamilton JA, LeGall T, et al. (2007) DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins.Nucleic Acids Res 35:D786–793Sigalov A, Aivazian D, Stern L (2004) Homooligomerization of the cytoplasmic domain of the Tcell receptor zeta chain and of other proteins containing the immunoreceptor tyrosine-basedactivation motif. Biochemistry 43:2049–2061Sigler PB (1988) Transcriptional activation. Acid blobs and negative noodles. Nature333:210–212Simon SM, Sousa FJ, Mohana-Borges R, et al. (2008) Regulation of Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesisby dimeric intrinsically disordered umuD gene products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA105:1152–1157Tompa P (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 27:527–533Tompa P (2003) Intrinsically unstructured proteins evolve by repeat expansion. Bioessays25:847–855Tompa P (2005) The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins.FEBS Lett 579:3346–3354Tompa P, Csermely P (2004) The role of structural disorder in the function of RNA and proteinchaperones. FASEB J. 18:1169–1175Tompa P, Fuxreiter M (2008) Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in proteinproteininteractions. Trends Biochem Sci 33:2–8Tompa P, Szasz C, Buday L (2005) Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting. TrendsBiochem Sci 30:484–489Tompa P, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I (2006) Prevalent structural disorder in E. coli and S. cerevisiaeproteomes. J Proteome Res 5:1996–2000Triezenberg SJ (1995) Structure and function of transcriptional activation domains. Curr OpinGenet Dev 5:190–196Trombitas K, Greaser M, Labeit S, et al. (1998) Titin extensibility in situ: entropic elasticity ofpermanently folded and permanently unfolded molecular segments. J Cell Biol 140:853–859.Tucker MM, Robinson JB, Jr., Stellwagen E (1981) The effect of proteolysis on the calmodulinactivation of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase. J Biol Chem 256:9051–9058Tuite MF, Koloteva-Levin N (2004) Propagating prions in fungi and mammals. Mol Cell14:541–552Uversky VN (2002) Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. ProteinSci 11:739–756Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL (2000) Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructuredunder physiologic conditions? Proteins 41:415–427Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK (2005) Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID forrecognition, regulation and cell signaling. J Mol Recognit 18:343–384