12.07.2015 Views

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 N.J. Burgoyne and R.M. Jacksonchemical character propensities, residue neighbour propensity, residue conservation,secondary structure, residue sequence separation, the length of loops and the locationof crystallographic water <strong>to</strong> similar effect. Several other related approaches arealso listed in Table 7.1. A comparison of the performance of these methods hasbeen made (Zhou and Qin 2007).7.6 SummaryThis chapter has detailed the current approaches which use surface properties in anumber of important applications including: protein function prediction; predictingbinding site location and druggability; annotation of ligand binding sites for structure-baseddrug design; and protein interface prediction. The various online <strong>to</strong>olsand methods have been introduced and the interested reader is referred <strong>to</strong> the publishedarticles for further details. We have attempted <strong>to</strong> give a broad overview of themethods and their practical applications; however, this is not a comprehensivereview of all methods in this important and emerging area.ReferencesAn<strong>to</strong>siewicz J, McCammon JA, Gilson MK (1994) Prediction of pH-dependent properties ofproteins. J Mol Biol 238:415–436.Beadle BM, Shoichet BK (2002) Structural bases of stability-function tradeoffs in enzymes. J MolBiol 321:285–296.Berchanski A, Shapira B, Eisenstein M (2004) Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-proteindocking. <strong>Protein</strong>s 56:130–142.Binkowski TA, Naghibzadeh S, Liang J (2003) CASTp: computed atlas of surface <strong>to</strong>pography ofproteins. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3352–3355.Bogan AA, Thorn KS (1998) Ana<strong>to</strong>my of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol280:1–9.Bordner AJ, Abagyan R (2005) Statistical analysis and prediction of protein-protein interfaces.<strong>Protein</strong>s 60:353–366.Bradford JR, Westhead DR (2005) Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using asupport vec<strong>to</strong>r machines approach. <strong>Bioinformatics</strong> 21:1487–1494.Brady GP Jr, S<strong>to</strong>uten PF (2000) Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets <strong>with</strong>PASS. J Comput Aided Mol Des 14:383–401.Brown D, Superti-Furga G (2003) Rediscovering the sweet spot in drug discovery. Drug DiscovToday 8:1067–1077.Burgoyne NJ, Jackson RM (2006) Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-proteinand protein-ligand interfaces. <strong>Bioinformatics</strong> 22:1335–1342.Cheng AC, Coleman RG, Smyth KT, et al. (2007) <strong>Structure</strong>-based maximal affinity model predictssmall-molecule druggability. Nat Biotechnol 25:71–75.Chothia C., Janin J (1975) Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature 256: 705–708.Clackson T, Wells JA (1995) A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-recep<strong>to</strong>r interface.Science 267:383–386.Connolly ML (1984) Analytical molecular surface calculation. J Appl Cryst 16:548–558.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!