12.07.2015 Views

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 A. Fiser(Clore et al. 1993). Changes in the environment (e.g., oligomeric state, crystal packing,solvent, ligands) can also have a significant effect on the structure (Faber andMatthews 1990). Overall, comparative modelling based on templates <strong>with</strong> more than40% identity is almost as good as medium resolution experimental structures, simplybecause the proteins at this level of similarity are likely <strong>to</strong> be as similar <strong>to</strong> each otheras are the structures for the same protein determined by different experimental techniquesunder different conditions. However, the caveat in comparative protein modellingis that some regions, mainly loops and side chains, may have larger errors.The performance of comparative modelling may sometimes appear overstated,because what is usually discussed in the literature are the mean values of backbonedeviations. However, individual errors in certain residues essential for the proteinfunction, even in the context of an overall backbone RMSD of less than 1 Å, canstill be large enough <strong>to</strong> prevent reliable conclusions <strong>to</strong> be drawn regarding mechanism,protein function or drug design.3.4 Applications of Comparative Modelling3.4.1 Modelling of Individual <strong>Protein</strong>sComparative modelling is often an efficient way <strong>to</strong> obtain useful information aboutthe proteins of interest. For example, comparative models can be helpful in designinggenetic experiments, such as designing mutants <strong>to</strong> test hypotheses about the functionof a protein (Vernal et al. 2002; G. Wu et al. 1999), identifying active and bindingsites (Sheng et al. 1996). Models are useful for studying protein-protein and proteinligandinteractions, designing inhibi<strong>to</strong>rs, e.g. searching, designing and improving ligandsfor a given binding site (Ring et al. 1993), modelling substrate specificity (L. Z.Xu et al. 1996), predicting antigenic epi<strong>to</strong>pes (Sali et al. 1993), simulating proteinproteindocking (Vakser 1995). Models can reveal physico-chemical features that arenot possible <strong>to</strong> guess from sequence information only, for instance, inferring functionfrom calculated electrostatic potential around the protein (Sali et al. 1993) and ingeneral, rationalizing known experimental observations (Fiser et al. 2003). Modelsare also very useful <strong>to</strong> enhance structure solutions by facilitating molecular replacementin X-ray structure determination (Schwarzenbacher et al. 2008), refining modelsbased on NMR constraints (Barrien<strong>to</strong>s et al. 2001), confirming a remote structuralrelationship (Guenther et al. 1997; G. Wu et al. 1999).3.4.2 Comparative Modelling and the <strong>Protein</strong> <strong>Structure</strong> InitiativeThe full impact of the genome projects will only be realized once we assign andunderstand the functions of the new encoded proteins. This understanding will be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!