12.07.2015 Views

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 A. FiserClaessens M, Van Cutsem E, Lasters I, et al. (1989) Modelling the polypeptide backbone <strong>with</strong>‘spare parts’ from known protein structures. <strong>Protein</strong> Eng 2:335–345Clore GM, Brunger AT, Karplus M, et al. (1986) Application of molecular dynamics <strong>with</strong> interpro<strong>to</strong>ndistance restraints <strong>to</strong> three-dimensional protein structure determination. A model studyof crambin. J Mol Biol 191:523–551Clore GM, Robien MA, Gronenborn AM (1993) Exploring the limits of precision and accuracyof protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Mol Biol231:82–102Cohen FE, Kuntz ID: Tertiary structure prediction, in Prediction of protein structure and theprinciples of protein conformations. Edited by Fasman GD. New York, Plenum, 1989,pp. 647–705Collura V, Higo J, Garnier J (1993) Modeling of protein loops by simulated annealing. <strong>Protein</strong> Sci2:1502–1510Contreras-Moreira B, Fitzjohn PW, Offman M, et al. (2003) Novel use of a genetic algorithm forprotein structure prediction: searching template and sequence alignment space. <strong>Protein</strong>s53(Suppl 6):424–429Dal<strong>to</strong>n JA, Jackson RM (2007) An evaluation of au<strong>to</strong>mated homology modelling methods at lowtarget template sequence similarity. <strong>Bioinformatics</strong> 23:1901–1908Das B, Meirovitch H (2003) Solvation parameters for predicting the structure of surface loops inproteins: transferability and entropic effects. <strong>Protein</strong>s 51:470–483Das R, Qian B, Raman S, et al. (2007) <strong>Structure</strong> prediction for CASP7 targets using extensive alla<strong>to</strong>mrefinement <strong>with</strong> Rosetta@home. <strong>Protein</strong>s 69(Suppl 8):118–128de Bakker PI, DePris<strong>to</strong> MA, Burke DF, et al. (2003) Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments:accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all-a<strong>to</strong>m statistical potential and theAMBER force field <strong>with</strong> the Generalized Born solvation model. <strong>Protein</strong>s 51:21–40Deane CM, Blundell TL (2001) CODA: a combined algorithm for predicting the structurally variableregions of protein models. <strong>Protein</strong> Sci 10:599–612DePris<strong>to</strong> MA, de Bakker PI, Lovell SC, et al. (2003) Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments:efficient generation of accurate, representative ensembles. <strong>Protein</strong>s 51:41–55Dill KA, Chan HS (1997) <strong>From</strong> Levinthal <strong>to</strong> pathways <strong>to</strong> funnels. Nat Struct Biol 4:10–19Do CB, Mahabhashyam MS, Brudno M, et al. (2005) ProbCons: Probabilistic consistency-basedmultiple sequence alignment. Genome Res 15:330–340Du P, Andrec M, Levy RM (2003) Have we seen all structures corresponding <strong>to</strong> short proteinfragments in the <strong>Protein</strong> Data Bank? An update. <strong>Protein</strong> Eng 16:407–414Edgar RC, Batzoglou S (2006) Multiple sequence alignment. Curr Opin Struct Biol16:368–373Edgar RC, Sjolander K (2003) SATCHMO: sequence alignment and tree construction using hiddenMarkov models. <strong>Bioinformatics</strong> 19:1404–1411Edgar RC, Sjolander K (2004) COACH: profile-profile alignment of protein families using hiddenMarkov models. <strong>Bioinformatics</strong> 20:1309–1318Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie JU (1997) VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models <strong>with</strong> threedimensionalprofiles. Method Enzymol 277:396–404Eramian D, Shen MY, Devos D, et al. (2006) A composite score for predicting errors in proteinstructure models. <strong>Protein</strong> Sci 15:1653–1666Espadaler J, Fernandez-Fuentes N, Hermoso A, et al. (2004) ArchDB: au<strong>to</strong>mated protein loopclassification as a <strong>to</strong>ol for structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D185–188Evers A, Gohlke H, Klebe G (2003) Ligand-supported homology modelling of protein bindingsitesusing knowledge-based potentials. J Mol Biol 334:327–345Eyrich VA, Marti-Renom MA, Przybylski D, et al. (2001) EVA: continuous au<strong>to</strong>matic evaluationof protein structure prediction servers. <strong>Bioinformatics</strong> 17:1242–1243Faber HR, Matthews BW (1990) A mutant T4 lysozyme displays five different crystal conformations.Nature 348:263–266Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Honig B (2007) Local quality assessment in homology models using statisticalpotentials and support vec<strong>to</strong>r machines. <strong>Protein</strong> Sci 16:1557–1568

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!