From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

316 I.A. Cymerman et al.Lu L, Lu H, Skolnick J (2002) MULTIPROSPECTOR: an algorithm for the prediction of proteinproteininteractions by multimeric threading. Proteins 49:350–364Malmstrom L, Riffle M, Strauss CE, et al. (2007) Superfamily assignments for the yeast proteomethrough integration of structure prediction with the gene ontology. PLoS Biol 5:e76McGovern SL, Shoichet BK (2003) Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo,apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. J Med Chem 46:2895–2907McGuffin LJ (2008) The ModFOLD server for the quality assessment of protein structural models.Bioinformatics 24:586–587Melo F, Feytmans E (1998) Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interactionenergy. J Mol Biol 277:1141–1152Melo F, Sanchez R, Sali A (2002) Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci11:430–448Michels PA, Chevalier N, Opperdoes FR, et al. (1997) The glycosomal ATP-dependent phosphofructokinaseof Trypanosoma brucei must have evolved from an ancestral pyrophosphatedependentenzyme. Eur J Biochem 250:698–704Oshiro C, Bradley EK, Eksterowicz J, et al. (2004) Performance of 3D-database molecular dockingstudies into homology models. J Med Chem 47:764–767Pawlowski K, Godzik A (2001) Surface map comparison: studying function diversity of homologousproteins. J Mol Biol 309:793–806Pawlowski M, Gajda MJ, Matlak R, et al. (2008) Meta-MQAP: a meta-server for the qualityassessment of protein models. BMC Bioinformatics in pressPieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, et al. (2006) MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative proteinstructure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D291–295Quiocho F, Vyas N (1999) Atomic interactions between proteins/enzymes and carbohydrates. In:Hecht SM (ed.), Bioinorganic Chemistry: Carbohydrates. Oxford University Press, New York,NYRaes J, Harrington ED, Singh AH, et al. (2007) Protein function space: viewing the limits or limitedby our view? Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:362–369Rigden DJ, Galperin MY (2008) Sequence analysis of GerM and SpoVS, uncharacterised bacterial‘sporulation’ proteins with widespread phylogenetic distribution. Bioinformatics, acceptedDOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn314Roberts RJ (2004) Identifying protein function–a call for community action. PLoS Biol 2:E42Sasin JM, Godzik A, Bujnicki JM (2007) SURF’S UP! - protein classification by surface comparisons.J Biosci 32:97–100Schafer P, Cymerman IA, Bujnicki JM, et al. (2007) Human lysosomal DNase IIalpha containstwo requisite PLD-signature (HxK) motifs: evidence for a pseudodimeric structure of theactive enzyme species. Protein Sci 16:82–91Service RF (2008a) Structural biology. Protein structure initiative: phase 3 or phase out. Science319:1610–1613Service RF (2008b) Structural biology. Researchers hone their homology tools. Science319:1612Silveira NJ, Uchoa HB, Pereira JH, et al. (2005) Molecular models of protein targets fromMycobacterium tuberculosis. J Mol Model 11:160–166Sodhi JS, Bryson K, McGuffin LJ, et al. (2004) Predicting metal-binding site residues in low-resolutionstructural models. J Mol Biol 342:307–320Song L, Kalyanaraman C, Fedorov AA, et al. (2007) Prediction and assignment of function for adivergent N-succinyl amino acid racemase. Nat Chem Biol 3:486–491Szilagyi A, Skolnick J (2006) Efficient prediction of nucleic acid binding function from low-resolutionprotein structures. J Mol Biol 358:922–933Tammaro P, Flanagan SE, Zadek B, et al. (2008) A Kir6.2 mutation causing severe functionaleffects in vitro produces neonatal diabetes without the expected neurological complications.Diabetologia 51:802–810Tamulaitiene G, Jakubauskas A, Urbanke C, et al. (2006) The crystal structure of the rare-cuttingrestriction enzyme SdaI reveals unexpected domain architecture. Structure 14:1389–1400